We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."
"It is a stable solution."
"The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"It would be beneficial to have a defined leveling or hierarchy system to facilitate better understanding and analysis. More openness and flexibility would enhance its capabilities."
"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"It's very user-orientated, which is why I gave it a high rating, even if it is not perfect in every corner."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."
"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.