CA Process Automation vs Temporal comparison

Broadcom and Temporal Technologies are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #36, while Temporal Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in PA, compared to Temporal Technologies’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Temporal Technologies users who would recommend it.

CA Process Automation

Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews

305 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Temporal

Read 18 Temporal reviews

2,056 Views
2,056 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CA Process Automation

Temporal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CA Process Automation and Temporal compete in process management and orchestration, focusing on automating complex workflows. Temporal has the upper hand due to its advanced features, which make it appealing for those prioritizing functionality over cost.

Features: CA Process Automation offers comprehensive workflow creation, strong adaptability, and extensive customization. Temporal provides scalability, fault tolerance, and seamless integration with various third-party tools.

Room for Improvement: CA Process Automation could improve scalability, fault tolerance, and integration capabilities. Temporal may enhance its user interface, simplify deployment, and expand support for non-developer users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Process Automation offers straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Temporal requires more intricate deployment but benefits from detailed documentation and an active community for support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Process Automation often has a lower initial setup cost and delivers quicker ROI for basic automation tasks. Temporal involves a higher initial investment, providing robust features and substantial long-term ROI for companies focused on extensibility and performance.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Process Automation vs. Temporal Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. Temporal

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Temporal

Ranking in Process Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 7.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jha

Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies

Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience

We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests. Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…

Read full review

AbhishekDash

Senior Software Engineer at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Orchestrates infrastructure tasks like deployment, deletion, and management

Temporal focus on developers rather than business users. In contrast to older workflow orchestration engines like Camunda, which are more business-oriented and strongly emphasize UI and workflow authoring, Temporal is geared toward developers. It provides extensive capabilities for building complex workflows. A standout feature of Temporal is its handling of long-running workflows, a significant advantage over many other solutions. Temporal excels in managing distributed transactions and application state durability, especially in microservice environments where transactions might fail due to network issues. Temporal simplifies these challenges by managing retries, fail-safes, and circuit breakers. As a result, developers don't need to implement these features manually; Temporal handles them implicitly, though it also allows for tuning based on specific needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."

"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."

"Temporal provides visibility into workflow progress and analytics and supports scheduled tasks with customizable settings, making it very convenient."

"What I like best about the tool is that it's easy to install, especially since it uses JavaScript. It's also easy to set up with Docker, and the documentation is easy to understand."

"What I like best about Temporal is its durable execution, which means you don't need to write many boilerplate code for critical pieces, especially for retries. It also has great observability and a nice dashboard to see issues without digging into logs. The interface for viewing activities is excellent, with good tracing that shows how long activities took and what ran, making it almost perfect for debugging."

"The solution's most valuable features include its ability to simplify the management of complex workflows, improve system resilience and fault tolerance, and reduce the need for extensive boilerplate code."

"The initial setup is easy."

"When some jobs take a lot of time and fail midway, the solution’s retry feature automatically causes them to retry."

"It is very useful for long-running workflows."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to manage and automate workflows without manual intervention efficiently."

More Temporal pros

Cons

"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."

"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."

"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."

"One area where I think Temporal could improve is its dashboard, particularly in event tracking. Currently, the dashboard doesn't show a time-based view of events, meaning it doesn't display when an event started or went through the retry process. If this feature could be added in a future release, it would significantly enhance monitoring capabilities. Other than that, Temporal's overall performance is quite impressive, and we're confident we can migrate to the Temporal workflow."

"Configuring workflows can be improved —the solution could offer more options, but it's not a must-have."

"Temporal could be improved by making it more user-friendly for beginners and non-technical staff, ensuring easier integration and usability across different use cases."

"One area for the product improvement is the learning curve."

"Temporal lacks many resources, like YouTube videos, which users can use to learn or refer to if they get stuck with the solution."

"We previously faced issues with the solution's patch system."

"While the tool can be a bit daunting initially, especially if you're not used to async programming models, it's generally a pleasure. There's always room for improvement, though. I've noticed some limitations with the .NET SDK regarding dynamic workflows, but this might have been improved in recent versions. Overall, I think Temporal could be more open about implementing features in a more—.NET-friendly way, especially in how you add workers and clients."

"I don't like the limitations on data flow, particularly the difficulty of passing large amounts of data between different activities."

More Temporal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."

"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

"Temporal is open-source and free to use, which is great. We didn't have to pay for any premium features."

"It is worth the price."

"The tool is open source under the MIT license, so there are no hidden fees. You can freely use everything on their GitHub and Docker images."

"Temporal is a free, open-source tool."

"The savings weren't as big as we initially expected, but they were pretty great from a developer's perspective."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?

In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temporal?

The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Temporal?

The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs CA Process Automation

Compared 100% of the time

More CA Process Automation Competitors

Camunda vs Temporal

Compared 46% of the time

Orkes vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Flowable vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

Control-M vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

More Temporal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation

August 2025

Download CA Process Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Temporal

July 2025

Download Temporal product report

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager

No data available

Overview

CA Process Automation is designed to speed the delivery of IT services while helping to remove manual errors. By defining, automating and orchestrating processes across organizational silos that use disparate systems, CA Process Automation helps improve productivity while also enforcing standards. With CA Process Automation, you can automate IT processes that span multiple organizations and systems, reduce the time it takes to deliver services and enforce standards and compliance policies across departments. CA Process Automation helps you automate IT processes to reduce operational expenses, increase staff productivity, speed IT service delivery, improve service quality, and enforce compliance policies.

Broadcom

Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.

Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.

What are Temporal's key features?

Automation and Efficient Management: Automatically handles workflows without manual intervention.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance: Features built-in retry policies for increased reliability.
Integration: Supports various programming languages, easing development.
Distributed Transactions: Simplifies complex transaction handling with reduced boilerplate code.
Durable Execution: Ensures long-running workflows are reliably managed.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Scalability and Reliability: Enhances IT environments through robust workflow management.
Ease of Integration: Supports seamless multi-platform automation.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces need for extensive coding, streamlining processes.
Durability and Fault Tolerance: Provides reliable asynchronous operations.

Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.

Temporal Technologies

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. Temporal

July 2025

Free Report: CA Process Automation vs. Temporal

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Process Automation vs. Temporal report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.