No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Asset Portfolio Management vs Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Asset Portfolio Management
Ranking in License Management
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (14th)
Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager
Ranking in License Management
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the License Management category, the mindshare of CA Asset Portfolio Management is 7.8%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is 3.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
License Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CA Asset Portfolio Management7.8%
Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager3.3%
Other88.9%
License Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1998918 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise systems management team lead
Integrates well, highly stable, and scalable
CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish. There are some other solutions that are better, such as Micro Focus. We have approximately 10,000 PCs that we are busy processing and we have to upload information to them but when we use this solution it is complex. When we use Micro Focus it is better.
PP
Engineer at Exclusive Networks
A highly stable solution that provides good authentication security and monitoring
The most valuable feature of Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is its configuration. The solution provides good authentication security and monitoring The solution’s interface could be improved. I have been using Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager for three years. I rate the solution a nine out of ten for…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From an implementation standpoint, and what we've seen so far of what it can do, I'd say we're extremely satisfied."
"You could also look for software that is no longer being used and you can re-deploy the software, so then you save from a purchasing standpoint because you don't have to buy the software again."
"Being able to determine the licensing position for existing vendors and future vendors. Also, visibility into our environment,"
"Also, the software you have, you can monitor for end of life. If you have software that is end of life, then you can have it uninstalled and buy the new software, so you can make sure that you're not running into vulnerabilities with unsupported software in your environment."
"Cost, time, and risks that relate to auditing of compliance are greatly reduced with the use of IT asset manager."
"Our organization really has improved quite a lot since we've been using this product."
"Reduces software cost. Reduces the risk of software audits."
"It enables us to make better business and financial decisions."
"The most valuable feature of Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager is its configuration."
 

Cons

"IT asset manager is very complex when integrated with other systems like HR, help desk, procurement and supply chain systems."
"The UI, even though they upgraded the UI, it's still kind of dated, it's a little bit convoluted to use. It's not like something that you can sit down and automatically understand how to use it."
"CA Asset Portfolio Management can improve the uploading of batch information. I have to upload large amounts of information and it can take a long time to finish."
"The UI, even though they upgraded the UI, it's still kind of dated, it's a little bit convoluted to use. It's not like something that you can sit down and automatically understand how to use it."
"As I'm looking into financial reporting and audits, new features to help with this would be good."
"CA SAM is not a CA product. The vendor is Aspera and CA is the distributor, so support is difficult."
"Very complex to setup with Human Resource, help desk, procurement, and supply chain systems."
"I would like to see more control over audit trail features, where you can turn on and off fields."
"The solution’s interface could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which License Management solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA IT Asset Manager, CA Asset Manager, ITAM, IT Asset Manager, CA SAM, CA Software Asset Manager, Asset Portfolio Management, Asset Portfolio Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

First Horizon National Corporation, Logicalis, Racing and Wagering Western Australia
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine, IFS, Flexera and others in License Management. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.