We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere API Management and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"We can develop almost any interface that we need."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."
"The product's stability is good."
"Integrations take less time."
"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."
"WSO2 API Manager's most valuable features are the simple interface that is easy to use and the APIs lifecycle."
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"WSO2 is very stable."
"API management lifecycle is the most valuable."
"This solution is a little bit faster, easier to use, and has better integration than the other solutions I have experienced."
"The solution is stable."
"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."
"The solution must provide more AI services."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"The product is really complex to manage."
"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."
"The API management has room for improvement."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"The solution could be more user friendly for engineers."
"I can say that user management is not really flexible. So, if I want to create 1,000 store users, I can't do it as a publisher. You have to register as a store user using the store URL."
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"I would like it to be a more convenient development platform with the ability to write orchestrations and so on. Our problem with this product is that in my country, we are the only enterprise that has been using this product. We're missing a lot of knowledge from colleagues to consult with, and we also aren't able to recruit people with relevant skills. It is a big problem. The small team that is maintaining this product is the only team that can actually relate to any technical issue. The support that we're getting from the company is not great. There is also a cultural gap there because they're from Sri Lanka, and it is not easy. They're putting in a lot of effort, but they are not meeting our expectations."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere API Management is ranked 14th in API Management with 8 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere API Management is rated 7.6, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere API Management writes "Complex to manage, and the documentation is quite hard to learn, though APIs can be created quickly and easily". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". Boomi AtomSphere API Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Apigee, Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway Enterprise and SwaggerHub, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
