Bonita vs Temporal comparison

Bonitasoft and Temporal Technologies are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Temporal Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Bonitasoft holds a 4.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Temporal Technologies’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Temporal Technologies users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,086 Views
2,376 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Temporal

Read 18 Temporal reviews

2,056 Views
2,056 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Bonita

Temporal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bonita and Temporal compete in the workflow automation domain. Temporal appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and advanced capabilities, providing significant value.

Features: Bonita provides customizable process models, an open-source platform, and a user-friendly interface ideal for flexible application development. Temporal focuses on reliability for complex workflows, seamless microservices architecture, and robust handling of distributed transactions.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could enhance its real-time collaboration features, provide more integrated analytics functionalities, and expand customization options for non-developers. Temporal may benefit from simplifying its initial setup, improving accessibility for non-technical users, and providing more detailed documentation examples for varied use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita facilitates straightforward deployment with extensive customer support for quick integration into existing systems. Temporal's deployment supports multiple programming languages and offers dedicated assistance, demanded due to its complexity, ensuring effective utilization but requiring more initial effort.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita is positioned as a cost-effective option with lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses seeking immediate ROI. Temporal may involve higher initial costs but offers compelling long-term ROI owing to its scalable infrastructure, making it a strategic choice for growth-focused enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. Temporal Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Temporal

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Business Process Management (BPM) (18th)

Temporal

Ranking in Process Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 7.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

AbhishekDash

Senior Software Engineer at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Orchestrates infrastructure tasks like deployment, deletion, and management

Temporal focus on developers rather than business users. In contrast to older workflow orchestration engines like Camunda, which are more business-oriented and strongly emphasize UI and workflow authoring, Temporal is geared toward developers. It provides extensive capabilities for building complex workflows. A standout feature of Temporal is its handling of long-running workflows, a significant advantage over many other solutions. Temporal excels in managing distributed transactions and application state durability, especially in microservice environments where transactions might fail due to network issues. Temporal simplifies these challenges by managing retries, fail-safes, and circuit breakers. As a result, developers don't need to implement these features manually; Temporal handles them implicitly, though it also allows for tuning based on specific needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"Development of forms and flows."

"Bonita is user-friendly."

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

More Bonita pros

"Temporal focus on developers rather than business users."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable thing about Temporal is that we can create multiple and child workflows. We can segregate work as we want, which is good for work organization. It's also easy to maintain. We're trying to generate and fill PDF forms with custom data, including digital signatures. We call AWS and do all activities through Temporal, like calling and saving data in buckets. We do this because we have a lot of load, with multiple users requesting data. We have two types of users: admin and customer. The admin creates forms, and employees or customers fill them out. When admin gets a form, it's stored in Temporal."

"Temporal allows retryability for different workflows whenever they fail. It helps ensure idempotence and that things get done."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to manage and automate workflows without manual intervention efficiently."

"It's easy to get started and user-friendly."

"The tool is easy for a beginner to learn. The documentation covers activities, workflows, workers, servers, and more. While more examples could be beneficial, the existing resources are good enough to help you get started. There are also YouTube videos available that can provide additional context. The Slack community for Temporal is very active and helpful, similar to Stack Overflow, where you can find answers to a wide range of questions from basic to advanced levels. If you have a unique question, the community is responsive and provides knowledgeable support."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to fix things quickly."

More Temporal pros

Cons

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

More Bonita cons

"I don't like the limitations on data flow, particularly the difficulty of passing large amounts of data between different activities."

"There are areas where Temporal could improve. For instance, calling multiple microservices with Temporal introduces latency due to workflow registration and analytics overhead."

"Developers often mention the desire for a more intuitive visualization of workflow states."

"One issue is that we don't have enough resources in the community to get answers when we face problems. We once had a cross-cluster persistence issue, which we solved using different keys. I think Temporal is good right now, but I'm part of the community and will let you know if I think of any improvements."

"Temporal's debugging is a bit complex."

"One area for the product improvement is the learning curve."

"One area where I think Temporal could improve is its dashboard, particularly in event tracking. Currently, the dashboard doesn't show a time-based view of events, meaning it doesn't display when an event started or went through the retry process. If this feature could be added in a future release, it would significantly enhance monitoring capabilities. Other than that, Temporal's overall performance is quite impressive, and we're confident we can migrate to the Temporal workflow."

"Retro compatibility needs improvement. Sometimes, when we make new changes to a workflow, it fails if it is not configured properly due to compatibility issues."

More Temporal cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The Community Edition comes free of charge."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"The savings weren't as big as we initially expected, but they were pretty great from a developer's perspective."

"Temporal is a free, open-source tool."

"Temporal is open-source and free to use, which is great. We didn't have to pay for any premium features."

"It is worth the price."

"The tool is open source under the MIT license, so there are no hidden fees. You can freely use everything on their GitHub and Docker images."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?

In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temporal?

The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Temporal?

The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 46% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 13% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs Temporal

Compared 46% of the time

Orkes vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Flowable vs Temporal

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

Control-M vs Temporal

Compared 5% of the time

More Temporal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

August 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

Temporal

July 2025

Download Temporal product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

No data available

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.

Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.

What are Temporal's key features?

Automation and Efficient Management: Automatically handles workflows without manual intervention.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance: Features built-in retry policies for increased reliability.
Integration: Supports various programming languages, easing development.
Distributed Transactions: Simplifies complex transaction handling with reduced boilerplate code.
Durable Execution: Ensures long-running workflows are reliably managed.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Scalability and Reliability: Enhances IT environments through robust workflow management.
Ease of Integration: Supports seamless multi-platform automation.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces need for extensive coding, streamlining processes.
Durability and Fault Tolerance: Provides reliable asynchronous operations.

Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.

Temporal Technologies

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Temporal

July 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. Temporal

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. Temporal report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.