BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs Webex comparison

Verizon and Cisco are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Webex

Read 130 Webex reviews

5,338 Views
4,964 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Webex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 28, 2025

Webex and BlueJeans Meetings are two leading virtual meeting platforms. Webex has an edge due to its comprehensive support and integration capabilities, while BlueJeans Meetings shines with its rich features appealing despite its pricing.

Features: Webex offers robust collaboration tools with seamless integration into cloud services, advanced security features, and high-definition video clarity. BlueJeans Meetings provides high-quality video and audio, innovative Dolby Voice technology, and versatile content-sharing options.

Room for Improvement: Webex could enhance its mobile app user interface, reduce latency in remote areas, and streamline updates for better usability. BlueJeans Meetings may improve its integration with third-party platforms, simplify its pricing model, and enhance customer feedback options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Webex provides extensive and straightforward deployment support with a comprehensive service structure. BlueJeans Meetings focuses on a more intuitive interface, making its deployment efficient, though it offers less detailed support documentation than Webex.

Pricing and ROI: Webex provides competitive pricing with strong ROI through bundled features and integrations. BlueJeans Meetings comes at a higher initial cost, justified by its premium video quality and features, appealing to those valuing quality over cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,125 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

130

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Meetings (4th)

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav

Solutions Architect-Hybrid Cloud and Automation at Red Hat

Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly

As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Collaborating in hybrid incident calls has become faster while the meeting interface still needs fixes

The best features are the ability to schedule meetings and launch ad hoc meetings. Additionally, we can create breakout rooms within the meeting itself, which is another excellent feature. Whenever we have production issues, many teams join a single Webex call. Sometimes we need to group together as separate smaller groups and work in parallel to identify the production issues. In those cases, we create Webex breakout rooms and each member joins the corresponding breakout session to progress on their task. Webex helps significantly in the hybrid environment. When we are working from home, it is very easy for us to meet with other team members and the management to get in touch and progress. Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call. It has improved the incident resolution time by getting into a call in Webex rooms and remediating the issues together as soon as possible. Audio and video quality is excellent for Webex. It has saved considerable time in terms of incident remediation. Whenever we have issues, we jump on a call and work together in parallel. This approach saves time and improves efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."

"BlueJeans Meetings is very easy to set up; it is integrated with Outlook and you just have to select your participants for it to automatically populate the main body of your email."

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."

"The quality of both audio and video is good."

"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."

"BlueJeans is a very good tool, and I have never experienced quality issues with the voice or video."

"The tool simplifies our work by allowing us to have hybrid meetings instead of always meeting in person, which saves time in organizing these meetings. It also offers good video quality."

"The installation of Webex is simple. You only need to click an executable file to run it. it is very easy."

"The stability of the solution is the most important thing, as I've used Teams previously and we had a lot of issues with stability."

"The noise cancellation feature is great; when you have a call, the noise cancellation during it is really good, and it's the best one if you're looking for that specific feature."

"I have found the most valuable features to be the high quality of the video and the audio. Additionally, the graphical user interface is good and it is easy to use."

"The most valuable option is screen sharing."

"Webex is a collaboration tool that helps you with remote support and collaboration."

"We have received a return on investment."

More Webex pros

Cons

"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."

"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."

"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."

"I would like the next release to be more user-friendly."

"When I use it personally, not in my enterprise, there is a time limit of about 60 minutes. After one hour, the call gets cut off. This limit should be increased."

"I do not like the solutions functions."

"In terms of features, it would be beneficial for Webex to focus on improving its chat functionality to make it more user-friendly. Additionally, enhancing communication operations to create a friendlier user experience would be advantageous. Other individuals who have tried using it faced challenges when attempting to share content with third parties during conversations or meetings."

"The price of the solution could be slightly reduced."

"Additionally, connecting to Webex can be technical, and it would be beneficial to have a way to connect anonymously using a simple code instead of going through microphone issues."

"All the features are not enabled in the web mode of the product."

"Video conferencing is not as fast as expected."

More Webex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."

"We purchase the product's yearly license. It is expensive."

"Webex is very expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"My organization took care of the licensing. I'm guessing they did some subscription cycle, but I used the free version."

"There is an annual license required for this solution."

"The price should be improved significantly."

"There is a subscription needed to use this solution and we pay approximately $5,000 per year."

"Features matter more than the price for us. As long as we get all the features we want and it fits our budget, then the price doesn't matter. I can't speak for other companies. We have tried other applications, and we run into some problems that we don't see in Webex."

More Webex pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	68

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webex?

Webex is top-notch at this point in time. The only improvement I see is related to RAM and CPU usage, as older systems with 4GB RAM or i3 processors might slow down the application. I do not have a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webex?

Webex is primarily used for customer meetings, collaboration with team members, presenting to customers, and virtual calls with customers. In my daily work, I get on the meeting and take the discus...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco TelePresence vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

GoToMeeting vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

LifeSize vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Fuze vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors

Zoom Workplace Business vs Webex

Compared 8% of the time

GoToMeeting vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

TeamViewer vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

GoToWebinar vs Webex

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Compared 5% of the time

More Webex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

May 2026

Download BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Webex

May 2026

Download Webex product report

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network

Cisco Spark

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.

What should users consider in reviews for ROI?

Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

Webex is a comprehensive platform for virtual meetings, supporting both internal and external communications with features like high-quality video and noise cancellation, integrated with Outlook for seamless scheduling.

Webex distinguishes itself with functionalities such as one-click meetings, file sharing, and efficient screen control. Its integration with Cisco hardware and telephony systems enhances its reliability and ease of use. While the interface could be optimized, Webex remains a dependable solution for a variety of sectors including manufacturing and telemedicine. The platform's scalability caters to diverse group sizes, facilitating everything from technical discussions to educational sessions. Despite some connectivity and navigation challenges, its security features and breakout sessions promote effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Webex?

One-click meetings: Simplifies meeting setup with easy access.
File sharing: Facilitates quick exchange of documents during calls.
Screen control: Allows seamless remote desktop management.
Noise cancellation: Reduces background interference for clearer communication.
Outlook integration: Streamlines meeting scheduling.

What benefits can users find in reviews?

High-quality audio and video: Ensures clear and reliable communication.
Security features: Offers robust protection for sensitive information.
Scalability: Adapts to varying conference sizes and business needs.
Ease of use: Intuitive navigation enhances user experience.
Integration with Cisco hardware: Optimizes performance and compatibility.

Webex is frequently deployed in industries like healthcare for telemedicine, enabling real-time patient consultations. In education sectors, it supports remote learning through video conferencing tools. Manufacturing companies utilize it for web and voice conferencing, enhancing team collaboration and communication efficiency.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund

Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, TeamViewer, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.