BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs GoToMeeting comparison

Verizon and GoTo are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of GoTo users who would recommend it.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

GoToMeeting

Read 26 GoToMeeting reviews

2,145 Views
2,059 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

GoToMeeting

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 28, 2025

GoToMeeting and BlueJeans Meetings compete in the video conferencing domain. GoToMeeting’s competitive pricing and robust support contrast with BlueJeans Meetings’ advanced features, positioning BlueJeans as compelling for feature-driven users.

Features: GoToMeeting provides high-definition video capability, reliable screen sharing, and integrations with Google Calendar and Office 365. BlueJeans Meetings offers Dolby Voice audio, Real-Time Intelligence with meeting transcription, and analytics, making it suitable for comprehensive business needs.

Room for Improvement: GoToMeeting could enhance its customer support satisfaction and expand its advanced feature offerings to meet diverse business needs. BlueJeans Meetings may consider making its feature set simpler for new users and offering more affordable pricing for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlueJeans features a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, emphasizing user satisfaction. GoToMeeting offers easy deployment but has varied support satisfaction, which may affect user experience.

Pricing and ROI: GoToMeeting is cost-effective with favorable ROI due to its lower pricing tiers. Though BlueJeans Meetings may have a higher setup cost, its feature depth and long-term benefits can justify this for businesses seeking comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoToMeeting

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Meetings (6th)

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav

Solutions Architect-Hybrid Cloud and Automation at Red Hat

Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly

As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…

Read full review

Steve Abshire

Information Systems Specialist III at a university with 10,001+ employees

It features low latency, which is crucial because everybody is using VPN to connect to their PCs at work.

Using GoToMeeting in a meeting-sized conference room is kind of a letdown. The camera is supposed to track the speaker and focus on that person so that they can be on the screen. That feature rarely worked. We tested it thoroughly, so maybe it was an issue with the size of the conference room. It may not be suitable for large conference rooms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The quality of both audio and video is good."

"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."

"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."

"BlueJeans is a very good tool, and I have never experienced quality issues with the voice or video."

"BlueJeans Meetings is very easy to set up; it is integrated with Outlook and you just have to select your participants for it to automatically populate the main body of your email."

"It can provide good communication with external partners."

"It works, it's reliable."

"The key advantage of GoToMeeting is the ability to use it without installing anything."

"GoToMeeting is an awesome product and it worked perfectly fine for us whether we used it through a browser or as a client."

"We like that this solution allows us to assign separate numbers to people without having to have a physical telephone system in place."

"Screenshare is the most valuable feature as well as the number of meeting participants possible in a meeting. It also has good quality."

"There is no lagging and the meeting interaction is seamless."

"We need a meeting thing, hey, go find a meeting thing."

More GoToMeeting pros

Cons

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."

"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."

"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."

"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."

"The newer user interface takes a bit longer to get used to."

"The tool needs to have a virtual room where users can pass through. It also needs to integrate a real-time translator."

"I didn't like the fact that they tried to make their new version look like Zoom."

"The enrolment for a non-IT user should be easier. It should be simplified for non-IT users."

"The product itself doesn't stand out against other options on the market."

"The solution could always be more secure."

"I don't know whether it is an issue or not but my boss was asking me if person one is in one room, and another person wanted to use another room at the same time, I don't know whether it is possible."

"Using GoToMeeting in a meeting-sized conference room is kind of a letdown. The camera is supposed to track the speaker and focus on that person so that they can be on the screen. That feature rarely worked. We tested it thoroughly, so maybe it was an issue with the size of the conference room. It may not be suitable for large conference rooms."

More GoToMeeting cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."

"GoToMeeting is a little bit expensive compared to other products."

"It is a little expensive although now, with the competition from Zoom and other products, they have lowered their prices and it is better."

"Negotiate for discounts."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Comparisons

Cisco TelePresence vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

LifeSize vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Fuze vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Blackboard Collaborate vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors

Webex vs GoToMeeting

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Teams vs GoToMeeting

Compared 9% of the time

Skype for Business vs GoToMeeting

Compared 8% of the time

TeamViewer vs GoToMeeting

Compared 8% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs GoToMeeting

Compared 7% of the time

More GoToMeeting Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

August 2026

Download BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

GoToMeeting

August 2026

Download GoToMeeting product report

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network

No data available

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.

What should users consider in reviews for ROI?

Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

GoToMeeting excels in providing a reliable, easy-to-set-up platform offering screen sharing and connectivity across devices, enhancing communication efficiency.

GoToMeeting is renowned for its lightweight and low-latency capabilities, supporting numerous participants with robust chat, recording features, and cost-effective pricing. Its cloud-based storage and written transcripts are highly valued, while the flexible interface supports multiple operating systems. Users benefit from scalability, a dependable iPhone app, and quality security elements ensuring secure sessions. Its competitive pricing reinforces its market position, though challenges persist with audio quality, interface intuitiveness, and support in mobile devices. Users note issues with connection speeds and third-party integrations, signifying areas for improvement.

What are GoToMeeting's key features?

Ease of Setup: Simple installation process eliminating technical complications.
Reliable Performance: Consistent, dependable service fostering uninterrupted communication.
Screen Sharing: Facilitates easy content sharing during meetings.
High Scalability: Supports numerous participants for diverse meeting needs.
Cost-Effective: Competitive pricing enhances attractiveness for users.

What benefits can users expect in reviews?

Quality Security: Provides robust measures ensuring safe communications.
Cloud Storage: Offers storage options with written transcripts for easy access.
Dial-In Capability: Broad access via phone, enhancing flexibility.
Interface Flexibility: Adaptable to multiple operating systems ensuring wide accessibility.

GoToMeeting is extensively used across industries for facilitating meetings, customer interactions, and internal collaborations. It caters to company discussions, vendor relations, and customer conferences, aiding organizations in client communication, internal discussions, training, webinars, and support calls with varying degrees of reliance and satisfaction regarding performance and consistency.

GoTo

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund

AAPT, ACD Groupe, Addison Fire, Avigilon Corporation, Basic Industries Ltd., Bitdefender, Branson School Online, Budd Van Lines, Business Fitness, Business Wire

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, TeamViewer, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.