BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] vs GoToMeeting comparison

Verizon and GoTo are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Additionally, 100% of Verizon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of GoTo users who would recommend it.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Read 4 BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

GoToMeeting

Read 26 GoToMeeting reviews

531 Views
531 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

GoToMeeting

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 28, 2025

GoToMeeting and BlueJeans Meetings compete in the video conferencing domain. GoToMeeting’s competitive pricing and robust support contrast with BlueJeans Meetings’ advanced features, positioning BlueJeans as compelling for feature-driven users.

Features: GoToMeeting provides high-definition video capability, reliable screen sharing, and integrations with Google Calendar and Office 365. BlueJeans Meetings offers Dolby Voice audio, Real-Time Intelligence with meeting transcription, and analytics, making it suitable for comprehensive business needs.

Room for Improvement: GoToMeeting could enhance its customer support satisfaction and expand its advanced feature offerings to meet diverse business needs. BlueJeans Meetings may consider making its feature set simpler for new users and offering more affordable pricing for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlueJeans features a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, emphasizing user satisfaction. GoToMeeting offers easy deployment but has varied support satisfaction, which may affect user experience.

Pricing and ROI: GoToMeeting is cost-effective with favorable ROI due to its lower pricing tiers. Though BlueJeans Meetings may have a higher setup cost, its feature depth and long-term benefits can justify this for businesses seeking comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoToMeeting

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Virtual Meetings (8th)

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Srivastav

Solutions Architect-Hybrid Cloud and Automation at Red Hat

Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly

As per company policy, most internal meetings happen through Google Meet, but for large-scale meetings with more than 500 participants, we use BlueJeans Meetings. It's more like a broadcast meeting platform, which Google Meet doesn't allow The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings…

Read full review

Gavin Tomlins

Chief Information Officer at a pharma/biotech company with 11-50 employees

Clunky with poor interface, lacks sufficient functionalities; it did reduce need for in-person meetings

We're phasing out the use of GoToMeeting because of some of its deficiencies. It lacks ease of connectivity, calendar integrations, and third-party app integrations. The user interface is quite poor and needs to be reworked and the product is quite clunky in comparison to its competitors. It currently lacks the ability for sharing collaborative materials during a meeting. We also found that the ability to switch between audio and video configurations isn't as intuitive as in other applications. I generally do 20-30 hours of video conferencing a day, so it makes a difference to have these features. It doesn't integrate as easily into phone systems as well as other organizations and it doesn't integrate as easy into instant messaging and collaboration tools or into software solutions. In general, some of the functionalities need to be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The quality of both audio and video is good."

"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."

"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."

"It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."

"We can record meetings and share the screen with participants."

"It's cost-effective."

"We don't have any link issues whether you use it to browser, or use it as a client. It worked perfectly fine for us."

"The solution worked well specifically for audio meetings."

"It's easy to set up."

"It works, it's reliable."

"GoToMeeting is very handy. It's good software. I would definitely recommend it."

"Ease of setup and login by attendees. Facilitates sharing visually, and not just via audio."

More GoToMeeting pros

Cons

"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."

"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."

"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."

"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."

"The tool needs to have a virtual room where users can pass through. It also needs to integrate a real-time translator."

"Lacks ease of connectivity, calendar integrations, and third-party app integrations."

"In addition to the features it already has, I think GoToMeeting should also have additional features that are not present at the moment."

"I don't know whether it is an issue or not but my boss was asking me if person one is in one room, and another person wanted to use another room at the same time, I don't know whether it is possible."

"In the next release, I would for it to incorporate files more efficiently from one computer to another when we covert things and send them out. I'm not sure if it's capable of that."

"Poor error recovery, too sensitive to transmission errors. Needs better codecs and more robust system software that can handle network glitches."

"The solution must include archive options to save the recorded meetings for future reference. The recording functionality can benefit our team by improving how meetings are recorded and shared. Previously, only admins could record meetings, sometimes leading to issues if recordings were missed or not shared properly. The recent update now allows hosting GoToMeeting sessions with the ability to delegate recording rights to other team members."

"We would like some improvement in the speed of initiating this solution, as it is currently fairly slow."

More GoToMeeting cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I once tried buying it for myself, but it was very costly. It is quite expensive as compared to other solutions. With BlueJeans, there are carrier charges if you call the toll-free number. The customer doesn't pay for the call, but the buyer or the subscriber of BlueJeans has to pay for it. That is where BlueJeans becomes very costly, and that is where Google, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom are very helpful because you don't have to pay these charges."

"GoToMeeting is a little bit expensive compared to other products."

"Negotiate for discounts."

"It is a little expensive although now, with the competition from Zoom and other products, they have lowered their prices and it is better."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BlueJeans Meetings?

The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BlueJeans Meetings?

In future releases, I would like to see maybe customized virtual backgrounds, like Google Meet has. BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BlueJeans Meetings?

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoToMeeting?

The solution must include archive options to save the recorded meetings for future reference. The recording functionality can benefit our team by improving how meetings are recorded and shared. Pre...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoToMeeting?

I use the solution when someone is comfortable using it, and I recommend using it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GoToMeeting?

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Skype for Business vs BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] Competitors

Skype for Business vs GoToMeeting

Compared 30% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs GoToMeeting

Compared 24% of the time

Webex vs GoToMeeting

Compared 17% of the time

TeamViewer Business vs GoToMeeting

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Teams vs GoToMeeting

Compared 14% of the time

More GoToMeeting Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

October 2025

Download BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

GoToMeeting

October 2025

Download GoToMeeting product report

Also Known As

BlueJeans Network

No data available

Overview

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] offered a versatile conferencing experience for businesses, featuring seamless integration and advanced capabilities for professional communication.

BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was known for enhancing virtual collaboration. It enabled companies to conduct efficient meetings with robust support for audio, video, and content sharing. Benefiting from extensive compatibility across platforms, it was adaptable to different technological setups within enterprises.

What are the key features of BlueJeans Meetings [EOL]?

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Accessible on various devices ensuring flexibility.
HD Video and Audio: Provides crisp and clear conferencing quality.
Content Sharing: Facilitates easy sharing of documents and presentations.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.

What should users consider in reviews for ROI?

Enhanced Productivity: Simplifies meeting setups and participation.
Cost-Efficiency: Streamlined communication reducing travel expenses.
Reliable Security: Provides secure communication channels.
Customer Support: Access to responsive and helpful technical assistance.

In industries such as healthcare and education, BlueJeans Meetings [EOL] was instrumental in supporting remote consultations and virtual classrooms. It promoted effective engagement between professionals and clients, highlighting its adaptability to diverse professional requirements.

Verizon

GoToMeeting web conferencing software makes it simple and cost-effective to collaborate online with colleagues and customers. Best of all, meeting participants can share their webcams in high definition, so you can enjoy more personal interactions _ without needing a complicated setup.

GoTo

Sample Customers

Criteo, Seattle Children's Hospital, The Wharton School, Wikia, Telit, Epilepsy, NENW, IPENZ, Medanta, Mphasis, Royal Academy of Dance, Wharton, Red Hat, HKS Architects, Forum of the Future, Commonfund

AAPT, ACD Groupe, Addison Fire, Avigilon Corporation, Basic Industries Ltd., Bitdefender, Branson School Online, Budd Van Lines, Business Fitness, Business Wire

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.