GoToWebinar vs Webex comparison

GoTo and Cisco are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. GoTo is ranked #19, while Cisco is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. GoTo holds a 2.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Cisco’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

GoToWebinar

Read 8 GoToWebinar reviews

443 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Webex

Read 127 Webex reviews

2,546 Views
2,470 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GoToWebinar

Webex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Webex and GoToWebinar are competing products in the virtual meetings and webinars category. Webex leads in pricing and customer service support, while GoToWebinar is favored for its comprehensive features.

Features: Webex integrates seamlessly with third-party apps, offers advanced security protocols, and provides customization capabilities, appealing to businesses with specific needs. GoToWebinar stands out for extensive webinar-specific tools like automated email reminders, detailed analytics, and custom branding options, better catering to large, structured virtual events.

Room for Improvement: Webex could enhance its webinar features and integration capabilities further to match GoToWebinar. It might also improve its advanced analytics and expand branding options. GoToWebinar could benefit from simplifying its integration with other apps, improving mobile experience, and enhancing affordability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Webex provides a simplified deployment process with comprehensive onboarding resources and 24/7 customer service. GoToWebinar, though slightly more complex to deploy, offers extensive documentation and strong support, typically available during business hours.

Pricing and ROI: Webex offers cost-effective plans favorable for organizations with budget constraints, ensuring high ROI through affordable pricing and robust support. GoToWebinar, despite higher pricing, compensates with specialized features that provide significant value, offering solid ROI for businesses requiring advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GoToWebinar vs. Webex Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Webex

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,986 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoToWebinar

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of GoToWebinar is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 7.6%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Webex	7.6%
GoToWebinar	2.2%
Other	90.2%

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

RITA Conroy-Martin

Director of Marketing at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Video library is a great tool and it enables good customization; feels a little antiquated and rusty

I like that recordings are available immediately, it's a great feature. I also appreciate being able to use the video library as a tool, and the integration of an API with other systems we have. We were able to build our own customer portal and then integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface. People thought they were on our platform, but they were using GoToWebinar. Those are unique features that seemed to be very easy for our development team to integrate. I like that aspect of it. It also provides good visibility if somebody had seen a webinar that was useful. It's very easy to push them out. Registration is an easy process as is customization on the back end. We very rarely had technical issues running the webinars so it's a pretty robust platform overall.

Read full review

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Collaborating in hybrid incident calls has become faster while the meeting interface still needs fixes

The best features are the ability to schedule meetings and launch ad hoc meetings. Additionally, we can create breakout rooms within the meeting itself, which is another excellent feature. Whenever we have production issues, many teams join a single Webex call. Sometimes we need to group together as separate smaller groups and work in parallel to identify the production issues. In those cases, we create Webex breakout rooms and each member joins the corresponding breakout session to progress on their task. Webex helps significantly in the hybrid environment. When we are working from home, it is very easy for us to meet with other team members and the management to get in touch and progress. Webex improves communication because even if we are working from home, we can connect with people and talk to them on a video call. It has improved the incident resolution time by getting into a call in Webex rooms and remediating the issues together as soon as possible. Audio and video quality is excellent for Webex. It has saved considerable time in terms of incident remediation. Whenever we have issues, we jump on a call and work together in parallel. This approach saves time and improves efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is browser-based and simple, which is an advantage over other solutions."

"I can extract the activity and the attendance reports, along with every single question that was asked during the webinar, which is a feature that we highly value."

"All of their features are good. They are more or less equivalent to the competition. There's less disturbance, less jitter, the voice is always good even at a low bandwidth."

"This solution is very reliable. It is easy to switch between audio and microphone when using headphones."

"We were able to build our own customer portal and integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface."

"Webex's clarity is good for video and audio. I have found it better than Zoom. We can receive notifications of meetings which is helpful."

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the fact that it is easy to share screens, a major reason I chose it."

"The video quality is good."

"The stream is very smooth. That's what I like about Webex. Other video conference solutions like Zoom sometimes freeze and get buggy, but Webex doesn't."

"Webex is a collaboration tool that helps you with remote support and collaboration."

"What we like about Webex is that it is a hosted solution, so there is no demand for us to invest in hardware, skill, or manpower to maintain our cloud meeting capability."

"The transcripts from Webex calls get delivered to the inbox five minutes after the call. However, out of 20 people on a call, maybe only one person bothers to read through the entire transcript, which can be lengthy for an hour-long call."

More Webex pros

Cons

"The sharing of cameras is limited to meeting organizers."

"The chat window and using polls is easier in Zoom than compared to GoToWebinar. Make it simpler and easier to publish polls on the fly would improve the solution."

"GoToWebinar would be improved with the inclusion of support for video endpoints."

"Some of my friends also use GoToWebinar to collect clients for affiliate marketing. In those cases, they found some features were missing with respect to some of the competition. And the worst part is the price."

"The platform feels old and a little rusty, more could be invested into the look and feel of it."

"The base application uses a lot of resources. They could work on the performance of the application so that it's less heavy."

"The product needs to improve its integration. I'm not sure how difficult it is for the IT team to set up the integration. Once set up, it's easy but still not as straightforward as other platforms, like Microsoft Teams, where everything is within the same technical environment. To ensure further security, face authentication should also be added for all internal corporate users logged into the platform."

"I would like to see additional online chat capabilities"

"I would like to see more integration, with respect to some more unified communication activities."

"The solution could improve by adding a survey or form feature to show for the users to be able to vote or answer any questions."

"The accessibility of the share screen option provided by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution should have better integration with Microsoft."

"Everybody these days uses virtual meeting solutions because we're all remote working. It would be a benefit if there were permanent collaboration spaces for projects. For example, the way Teams has its teams folders and shared locations. Webex is missing that feature, or maybe it has it and I'm not aware of it. However, it needs a permanent sharing location for when projects can get stored and can be a collaboration space as opposed to only a meeting space."

More Webex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a monthly subscription and the price is quite expensive if you're not paying annually."

"This is a free solution."

"You need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges of the product. You need to opt for a subscription-based licensing model for your organization. The product is a bit expensive."

"The price of the license depends a lot on the type of service required and whether it is for the entire company or only for a few users."

"Webex is expensive, especially compared to Zoom or Google."

"The tool's licensing is expensive, but it should be cheaper."

"I use the free version, not the enterprise version. The only compelling reason to go for paid WebEx pay is if you're hosting large meetings."

"I am using the free version of Webex."

"I believe the license to be monthly."

"There are licenses for business to use the solution but for end-users, there is not."

More Webex pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Webex?

Webex improved our overall team collaboration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?

From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because if I want to implement it for an organization, I need to pay a per-user license, which m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webex?

Webex is a fine, perfectly adequate product, and I don't see any room for improvement. From when I last implemented it, I found the price to be expensive. The licensing model doesn't work because i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Teams vs GoToWebinar

Compared 34% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs GoToWebinar

Compared 21% of the time

PGi GlobalMeet vs GoToWebinar

Compared 11% of the time

More GoToWebinar Competitors

Skype for Business vs Webex

Compared 14% of the time

Zoom Workplace Business vs Webex

Compared 12% of the time

Adobe Connect vs Webex

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meeting Server vs Webex

Compared 9% of the time

GoToMeeting vs Webex

Compared 6% of the time

More Webex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar

January 2026

Download GoToWebinar product report

Buyer's Guide

Webex

December 2025

Download Webex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Spark

Overview

Web conferencing SaaS for larger webinars

GoTo

Webex is designed to help companies improve communication and increase productivity with unlimited HD video meetings in shared meeting spaces.

Companies can use Webex, a Cisco product, to collaborate with peers, share documents and other information, create high-impact webinars and online events, and present dynamic online courses. It can be tailored to your exact company needs and can be fully integrated with mobile apps for iPhone, iPad, Android, and BlackBerry.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Avigilon Corporation, Bitdefender, British Library's Business & IP Centre, Business Wire, Clarity, Colt, Conversion Rate Experts, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., DemandGen, DPR Construction

Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.

Buyer's Guide

GoToWebinar vs. Webex

December 2025

Free Report: GoToWebinar vs. Webex

Find out what your peers are saying about GoToWebinar vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoToWebinar vs. Webex report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.