Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BizTalk Server vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

BizTalk Server and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BizTalk Server is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.8, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. BizTalk Server holds a 1.0% mindshare in PA, compared to Microsoft System Center Orchestrator’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of BizTalk Server users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator users who would recommend it.
BizTalk Server
Read 16 BizTalk Server reviews
  • 1,276 Views
  • 612 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Read 2 Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reviews
  • 1,028 Views
  • 1,028 Comparison Views
33% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BizTalk Server and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator compete in the enterprise integration and automation category. System Center Orchestrator seems to have the upper hand due to its superior automation capabilities and cost-effective setup, making it more suitable for optimizing IT processes.

Features: BizTalk Server offers enterprise-level integration capabilities with reliable message handling, robust adapters, and extensive protocol support. It enhances business processes through message transformation and routing. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator provides comprehensive IT process automation, enabling task automation and integration with Microsoft services. It allows for custom runbook creation, offering efficient workflow management. While BizTalk focuses on connectivity, Orchestrator prioritizes optimizing IT operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator provides a user-friendly deployment model with predefined runbook activities and strong community support. BizTalk Server requires more specialized expertise, focusing on enterprise integrations. Orchestrator often deploys faster, enhancing IT process efficiency, while BizTalk necessitates extensive setup for complex integrations.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server involves higher setup costs, generating significant ROI in complex integration environments. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator presents a cost-effective setup, delivering ROI through enhanced automation and reduced operational workload. BizTalk's costs are justified in sophisticated integration scenarios, whereas Orchestrator's lower costs and high efficiency favor IT process optimization.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server
Ranking in Process Automation
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Ranking in Process Automation
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
BizTalk Server1.0%
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator1.3%
Other97.7%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

TH
Taqi-Hasan
Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution
Offers valuable integration services but requires better cloud adaptation
Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk Server was initially limited because of scalability issues. That is the reason why management has decided to implement IBM WebMethods. We are going to decommission BizTalk Server next year. I believe the API response could be improved in BizTalk Server. We need to increase the number of servers in BizTalk Server. We used to have two servers; later on, we increased to a third server, which has improved performance. We can make it more highly available and scale out to improve BizTalk Server. Scale out means we can increase the number of servers horizontally.
Read full review
Dan Campeanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Dan Campeanu
Security Engineer at ProVision
Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location
The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."
"Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable."
"The BizTalk Server business rule engine was very useful for us and has helped us for the last 12 years."
"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."
"We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly."
"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."
"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."
"BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product."
More BizTalk Server pros
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
 

Cons

"The product's deployment can be quicker"
"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex."
"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."
"I didn't find anything particularly valuable in BizTalk Server. It didn't help me, and we are moving away from BizTalk Server to a new platform."
"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."
"BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features."
"BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages."
"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."
More BizTalk Server cons
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."
"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."
"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."
"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."
"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."
"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."
"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise9
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?
The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.
See all answers
What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?
I am generally satisfied with BizTalk Server, but there are some gaps, as we have multiple integration tools. Thus, there is associated cost, operation cost, license cost, and CapEx, so we are tryi...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?
I have not worked with Amazon API Gateway or Mule ESB; I am just testing them. I am using Boomi iPaaS and WebMethods. I did not purchase it on AWS Marketplace; those are product API systems, and in...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
The platform was almost free of cost for us. We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
The product's management aspect needs enhancement. It affects the visibility of powerful scripts that were previously accessible. Furthermore, the focus is shifting towards cloud-based features, sp...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server
Compared 13% of the time
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server
Compared 11% of the time
Camunda vs BizTalk Server Logo
Camunda vs BizTalk Server
Compared 10% of the time
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server Logo
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server
Compared 10% of the time
SnapLogic vs BizTalk Server Logo
SnapLogic vs BizTalk Server
Compared 5% of the time
More BizTalk Server Competitors
Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 15% of the time
CA Process Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
CA Process Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 12% of the time
Ivanti Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
Ivanti Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 12% of the time
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 12% of the time
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BizTalk Server
December 2025
BizTalk Server reportDownload BizTalk Server product report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
December 2025
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reportDownload Microsoft System Center Orchestrator product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS System Center Orchestrator
 

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.
Microsoft

As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
December 2025
Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BizTalk Server vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.