We performed a comparison between Camunda and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The best feature is the automation."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Documentation can be improved."
"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 19th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration and BizTalk Server.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
