We performed a comparison between Bizagi and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."
"Great mapping feature that's easy to use."
"I very much like the reusable rules and forms, and the way Bizagi controls the process flow. I also like the document generating system to generate PDFs and then .doc files with information gathered from a flow. At the end of a process, you can generate a document that can be printed."
"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."
"The approval process is simple."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"Very, very stable."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"What I find good in UiPath Process Mining is that it integrates well with SAP."
"The visualization part, showing the number of cases processed successfully after a process is executed, is the most valuable. It also showed how effective a bot is after production. This kind of analysis that we got from UiPath Process Mining was good."
"I have never had issues with online technical support."
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Process Mining is the comparison feature."
"UiPath's communication interface looks good."
"This solution is very easy to use and implement as you are able to partner with a cloud enterprise and be on your way."
"You can build flows with this product."
"It saves our clients a lot of time."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"Agriculture, Industry."
"Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it."
"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"It should provide the ability to create a simple application. It can be used for database modeling diagrams and forms, but it should also support CRUD, that is, create, read, update and delete."
"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"I would like a few tutorials that explain step by step how to start, including a few tips for new users."
"While it is fairly stable, this is something that could be improved."
"Within UiPath, AI Fabric is a valuable feature, but Process Mining can be further improved with AI. AI is booming. Once they improve the AI capabilities, more and more customers will come to UiPath."
"It's quite an expensive solution."
"There are a few complexities involved in setting up the solution."
"I would like for user onboarding/onboarding of enterprise clients to be simplified in the next release."
"We sometimes can have some issues with the scalability on the platform because we are sharing the licenses."
"The user interface could be more user intuitive."
Bizagi is ranked 4th in Process Mining with 78 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. See our Bizagi vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
