We performed a comparison between Tungsten Insight and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides the ability to design applications directly."
"You can easily customize reporting to pull the fields that interest you."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Its Artificial Intelligence dependencies are valuable."
"What I find good in UiPath Process Mining is that it integrates well with SAP."
"It has all the features in terms of being able to read and analyze data from various systems."
"Simple solution that allows us to write code."
"UiPath Process Mining has a good roadmap ahead for the future."
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
"Process mapping tool is most valuable tool."
"I use this solution for product mining and docking."
"The initial setup is complex and would be difficult to carry out without any training."
"If there's any negative, it's just the different names, the branding names that the product's gone through. It's confusing."
"It would be ideal if there were some standard forms that could be customized."
"Data crunching needs to be done by an analytics team and then imported."
"Cost of the solution is high."
"It would be nice if UiPath's Document Understanding feature supported more languages. I don't think it supports Chinese or Japanese. We have been working in the Asia-Pacific region for a long time, and this prevents us from recommending the solution to some customers."
"Process mining is something that we are doing, but I think it needs to be more mature. UiPath is still new to process mining. They are decent in SAP ERP when it comes to process mining. But compared to Oracle's E-Business Suite and all, they are still pretty new."
"What needs improvement in UiPath Process Mining is manual delay support. For example, I have a pending workflow, and I've not taken action in the last five or ten days, and because of this, the whole process gets delayed, but UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide any manual delay insights. It gives about seventy to seventy-five percent detail on end-to-end process delays, the scope of automation, or the gap, but not about the manual delay, so what would make the solution better is if it communicates manual delay information. Every business process relies on human activity, with either approval or review, so UiPath Process Mining should capture that area and provide a workflow or diagram that shows more details, such as the impact of the delay, the workflow time without the human delay, etc. That could be too difficult, but it's what I'm expecting as a customer. More automation in UiPath Process Mining would be great."
"In an upcoming release, they could improve on the customization."
"I would like to see better integration with the Azure and AWS machine learning platforms."
"Process Mining still has to mature somewhat."
Tungsten Insight is ranked 12th in Process Mining with 3 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Tungsten Insight is rated 7.6, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Tungsten Insight writes "Great reporting and customizations with good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Tungsten Insight is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ and Minit. See our Tungsten Insight vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.