We performed a comparison between Celonis vs UiPath Process Mining based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions are very comparable. Users share favorable ratings for both, although UiPath Process Mining is considered to be more affordable than the paid version of Celonis. UiPath may also be simpler to deploy.
"The solution has very detailed documentation for technical items so it is very easy for developers to use."
"The process mapping is most valuable to us."
"It is a very strong and very powerful solution. You can seamlessly process a large amount of data. It doesn't take a long time to do the analysis. It provides the analysis matrix, which basically includes all the analytics that need to be performed for the transactions. You can drill down really fast within graphics. You can double click and drill down to specific areas for more details. It is very intuitive and easy to use."
"The product helps clients visualize potential savings by minimizing human errors and reducing manual work."
"find Action Engine for notifying the user, and also Studio Spark, and knowledge models; all these features are useful."
"Celonis is one of the best solutions on the market. It offers you a lot of training materials and exposure to its ecosystem. Celonis is trying its best to prepare an ecosystem for it because, without an ecosystem, you will not be able to scale up."
"The solution offers very good division management."
"We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process."
"For us, the most important feature of UiPath Process Mining is something called Document Understanding. We have found it to be extremely valuable, given that the current situation we have right now is that it's not just pure automation of manual and repetitive tasks. What we're doing is more along the lines of what you could call "intelligent" automation. Document Understanding plays a great role in this type of process automation because it helps us in automating the reading of documents better and, therefore, helps to automate intelligence for our customers."
"The features of UiPath that I find most valuable was working with Abbyy scanning."
"With Salesforce, you can identify individual tasks that are potentially consuming time within each process. You can see what process you want to automate and which task within a process will give you the most bang for your buck."
"Their support is really good, and it is a stable product."
"The solution has some quality and time assurances to improve our business."
"The solution counts the number of cross-sections at each step of the year which allows you to see all the data to figure out what is happening in the company. You do not need to manually collect data, it continuously updates the data. Overall the solution is easy to use and has dashboards."
"It's very useful in turning raw data into actionable information."
"UiPath Process Mining is definitely stable."
"The solution needs to implement more automation aspects into the product. Right now, it's lacking."
"The product must focus on training for low-code and no-code people."
"In the solution, you have access to how the process is, and are able to integrate that with other systems that allow you to make changes to the process itself, this process can be improved."
"They are killing the customers with high licensing prices. The tool’s pricing could be cheaper. Small enterprises wouldn’t be able to afford the tool."
"In the next release, I would like for them to integrate more custom features to ease the process of having multiple solutions. I would like to be able to integrate it with other solutions."
"They need to provide readymade value stream mapping."
"The one thing that could be improved is the guides are not getting updated to cover new features and upgrades, which means we can't use them at their full potential."
"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis."
"The remote desktop we utilize suffers from inconsistent performance, sometimes functioning well and other times not."
"The connection to other systems could be better."
"That depends whether I can get the input information to explain why the exceptions are happening. Is it because of different policies or incorrect procedure being applied? If that information would also being integrated as part of it, it would make my life easier."
"The initial setup can sometimes be a little complicated."
"Cost of the solution is high."
"The technical support for UiPath Process Mining needs some improvement."
"The dashboard could be improved by allowing customization and they could introduce a Mac version of the solution."
"The training materials sometimes don't keep up with the system changes."
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 29 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 32 reviews. Celonis is rated 8.4, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Good user interface and features for data extraction, data loading, and data transformation, but the stability could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "We can compare our mining processes and saves us money, but there are not enough connectors". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Software AG ARIS Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Minit and Scout Platform, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and ABBYY Timeline. See our Celonis vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.