We performed a comparison between SAP Signavio Process Manager and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."
"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."
"This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."
"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."
"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."
"UIPath Process Mining is stable."
"The visualization part, showing the number of cases processed successfully after a process is executed, is the most valuable. It also showed how effective a bot is after production. This kind of analysis that we got from UiPath Process Mining was good."
"UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful."
"UiPath Process Mining is definitely stable."
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Process Mining is the process graph, which gives you a depiction of the process and lets you know where the issues and delays are occurring."
"Its speediness is most valuable. It is quick to develop. It is also quick and easy to learn."
"It has all the features in terms of being able to read and analyze data from various systems."
"The most valuable feature is the user interface, which makes it easy to use for tasks like configuring resources."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."
"I would like to see more predictive analytics. The tool already has all the process maps, but it could offer a more proactive improvement offering. For example, they could put a little bit more machine learning behind it."
"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."
"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."
"The installation documentation and guides for users from UiPath Process Mining could be a little better."
"UiPath Process Mining could improve by limiting the number of updates."
"In an upcoming release, they could improve on the customization."
"UiPath Process Mining is not as user-friendly as Celonis."
"I would like a few tutorials that explain step by step how to start, including a few tips for new users."
"If UiPath can identify where it has gone wrong and try to identify the bottleneck value, which are more machine learning in AI, it would be great."
"The cost should be improved with variable models to help different types of users afford the product."
"I have found UiPath Process Mining to be a very complex tool to use. They could improve the OCR recognition feature."
SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 15 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 33 reviews. SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "We can compare our mining processes and saves us money, but there are not enough connectors". SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and IBM Blueworks Live, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, FortressIQ, Minit, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and ABBYY Timeline.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.