We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The stability is very good."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The most valuable features are the solution's thorough detection and ease of use."
"I like GravityZone's short implementation time. It takes only a day, at most."
"The setup was easy."
"It is stable."
"What I have found to be valuable is after every new release of the solution there are more features. At the time that we bought Bitdefender GravityZone, it was their top solution. We went from their Enterprise version to Elite, Elite HD, Ultra, and now there is an Ultra Plus available."
"It's a very stable solution."
"We like the dashboard, the console, the reporting. It's very easy to deploy."
"Sandbox Analyzer, HyperDetect, and EDR are valuable to our customers."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"Its customer service is quite good."
"The product is very easy to use."
"Encryption is the most valuable feature. It creates an encryption tunnel from your location to the delivery address."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The on-premises setup for Bitdefender sometimes faces issues with connectivity. Management of Windows Defender is a bit easier compared to Bitdefender."
"The pricing should be improved. The user interface has been improved on a yearly basis. The key issue is that they need to look at their pricing."
"In terms of improvement of the solution, it could have better features. For example, having a firewall within. This way we would only need one solution."
"They need to improve their encryption capabilities."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"The solution is sometimes resource-intensive."
"Areas for improvement would be performance and pricing."
"The firewall security could be better."
"The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it."
"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."
"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
"It does not cover all of our security issues."
"Installing Kaspersky is complex. It requires more work from system admins and takes almost one week to deploy, including integration and mapping with other solutions. You also have to configure Kaspersky EDR sandboxing then set up permissions for various teams and customers."
"An area for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its technical support because currently, technical support is delayed."
"Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users."
"The installation process could be more streamlined."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 15th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 54 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet and Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.