We performed a comparison between Bitbucket Server and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Our code is secure."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"Git is easy to use."
"The product protects our data."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"Git removed the credential feature."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
"More security is always welcome in my opinion."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"The solution could improve by having more customization."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 18 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Bitbucket Server is rated 8.4, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM and Helix Core. See our Bitbucket Server vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
