Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,033 Views
1,033 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: December 2025).

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 16.3%, down from 28.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.6%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	16.3%
Git	10.6%
Other	73.1%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Dan Berg

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Provides strong code management and tracking features for development teams

We use Bitbucket Server in the company. Since I'm not using Bitbucket Server every day, it's more my technicians, developers, and engineers using it. I would need to talk with them first. We use Jira integration with Bitbucket Server, but I'm running out of time. I would need to discuss the satisfaction with these integrations with my technical product owners because they are more involved in this than I am right now. I believe installing Bitbucket Server is quite easy, but I'm not doing the installation or integration. I'm just working with other people who do that. I couldn't provide points for technical support because I haven't been in contact with them much. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bitbucket Server an 8.

Read full review

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."

"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

More Git pros

Cons

"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."

"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to approve things but don't use Bitbucket Server so often."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"I would like more documentation."

"It's not very user-friendly."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The platform is less expensive."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is an open-source software."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to appr...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use Bitbucket Server for storing code. It is a way to manage configuration items, keep track of code, commits, and pull requests.

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 71% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 5% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 26% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Bitbucket Server

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Bitbucket Server vs. Git