Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,057 Views
1,057 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: July 2025).

Download the complete report

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

July 2025

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 9.5%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."

"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."

"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

More Git pros

Cons

"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."

"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."

"The product's initial setup phase is complex."

"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"The tool is free."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"We use the open-source version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 88% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 38% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

August 2025

Download Git product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse