Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: April 2025).

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 25.9%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I use the solution for website management."

"The implementation is easy."

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"The product protects our data."

"The initial setup is very easy."

More Git pros

Cons

"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."

"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."

"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."

"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"The platform is less expensive."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"The tool is free."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 94% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 4% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 36% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 16% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Bitbucket Server

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Bitbucket Server vs. Git