Bitbucket Server vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,462 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Git are prominent tools in version control. Git seems to have a slight edge due to its advanced functionalities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers strong integration with Atlassian products, support for large files, and enterprise-oriented features. Git is known for its speed, flexibility in branching and merging, and open-source nature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could improve its user experience, performance under heavy loads, and user interface. Git users often point out the need for better documentation, improved third-party integrations, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server's deployment is straightforward but resource-intensive, requiring significant IT support. Git's decentralized model eases deployment but may confuse users new to distributed version control. Bitbucket Server offers structured enterprise support, whereas Git relies on community support, which can vary in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server has higher setup costs justified by its robust feature set but is costlier. Git, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and is more cost-effective for smaller teams or individual developers. Bitbucket Server may offer better ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features, whereas Git provides better ROI for a diverse user base.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report (Updated: March 2026).

Bitbucket Server vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 12.2%, down from 27.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 11.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bitbucket Server	12.2%
Git	11.4%
Other	76.4%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Syed Fahad Anwar

Principal System Developer at DiwanDubai

Integrated code tracking has streamlined our development workflows and supports project visibility

The biggest benefit I see from Bitbucket Server is that it is providing all the features which Git is providing. Bitbucket Server is using Git as a source code main tool, and it has all the features that any source code repository can provide. A plus point is that we can install it on-premises and manage it easily. Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort. Without Bitbucket Server, it is very difficult to track the code and changes. The integration with Jira helps me personally with project tracking because Bitbucket Server is a source code repository. We have our SDLC lifecycle in Jira. Every change or every feature request is created as a ticket in Jira, and this ticket is linked with Bitbucket Server repository. Any changes to the code linked to that feature will go to the repository, and we can track that this is the code changed by this feature.

Read full review

Vijaya Das

Director - Technical Product Management at Visa

A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments

Scalability is something I haven't experienced. So, a bigger team in my company looks after the scalability aspect of the solution. Therefore, I will not be the right person to rate it from a scalability perspective. Around 200 users are using Git in my company. I am not the right person to comment on whether the solution's usage rate will increase in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

"Using Bitbucket Server helps me easily track my code changes and where they belong, which saves a lot of time and effort."

"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."

"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."

"Git is easy to use."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

More Git pros

Cons

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."

"There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to approve things but don't use Bitbucket Server so often."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"Git removed the credential feature."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"We use the open-source version."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"The platform is less expensive."

"Git is completely free."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

19%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are certain features in Bitbucket Server that could be better or enhanced, which would make our life easier. One limitation is that we can control granular permissions, but there are some lim...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

My major use case for Bitbucket Server is that it is a source code repository. We are using it to store our application source code, and we are tracking the check-in, check-out, and all the activit...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

What is your primary use case for Git?

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 50% of the time

GitHub vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 13% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 8% of the time

Surround SCM vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 6% of the time

Liquibase vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Git

Compared 4% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Bitbucket Server

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Bitbucket Server vs. Git