Bitbucket Server vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,567 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Bitbucket Server are leading solutions in software development. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and flexible pricing considered worth the cost.

Features: GitHub offers extensive integration capabilities, strong version control, and advanced security features. Notable features include GitHub Actions for automation, robust pull request strategies, and a comprehensive collaboration platform. Bitbucket Server integrates seamlessly with Atlassian products like Jira and Bamboo, excels in CI/CD pipelines, and offers customizable server management with the Atlassian Plugin Framework.

Room for Improvement: GitHub can improve its search functionality, markdown support, and integration with Jenkins. There is a need for better project management and DevOps tools integration. Bitbucket Server requires easier navigation, enhanced code collaboration tools, and more efficient real-time synchronization. Improvements in its Jira integration and support system are also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server primarily targets on-premises deployments with mixed customer service reviews. GitHub offers a variety of deployment options, including public and hybrid cloud solutions, and generally received favorable customer support feedback, though enhancements in technical support are recommended.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides attractive pricing, especially for open-source projects, with options supporting scalability. Bitbucket Server, while perceived as costly, offers valuable secure collaboration features and is beneficial for cloud solutions. Both platforms align their pricing models with user scaling needs, each offering distinct advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report (Updated: September 2025).

Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

Bitbucket Server offers cost savings, improved collaboration, and reduced maintenance, surpassing Perforce or GitLab alternatives in efficiency and value.

Sentiment score

5.0

GitHub provides efficient code management, cost benefits, secure code, and organizational advantages, enhancing market delivery and user experience.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.4

Bitbucket Server's support receives mixed reviews, with inconsistencies reported, but overall satisfaction and desire for improved responsiveness.

Sentiment score

6.5

Users primarily rely on community resources for support, but some desire quicker access to GitHub's technical support.

If they encounter problems beyond their scope, they contact the vendor directly.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.5

Bitbucket Server is highly rated for scalability, supporting various project sizes and accommodating growth with minor adjustments.

Sentiment score

7.7

GitHub efficiently supports global teams with scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring performance and stability for diverse user and project sizes.

Bitbucket Server has been working efficiently for us so far, and I would rate it an eight or nine for scalability.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at Boxpeg

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

1.0

Bitbucket Server is highly stable, often rated 9-10/10, with minor issues mostly related to indexing and linked system downtimes.

Sentiment score

8.7

GitHub is stable, supports over 1,000 users effectively, with transparency and reliable updates appreciated, despite minor issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Bitbucket Server requires better scaling, modernization, integration, user support, and enhanced features for competitiveness and improved user experience.

GitHub needs improved security, integration, AI enhancements, UI/UX, search, docs, automation, and support for better user experience.

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Collaboration could be improved as the main aspect.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area.

Soni Sinha

Senior Manager at Genpact - Headstrong

When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Setup Cost

Bitbucket Server pricing varies by user count, affecting costs, with on-premises options considered expensive, yet competitive.

GitHub provides cost-effective subscription options with a free basic version, ideal for public use, and competitive pricing for enterprises.

It's probably slightly expensive, and the cost depends on what you compare it with.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

Valuable Features

Bitbucket Server offers integration, a user-friendly interface, efficient code management, scalability, and flexible pricing, ideal for developers.

GitHub offers robust community support, security, version control, integration with DevOps tools, and flexibility for distributed teams.

The pull request feature in Bitbucket Server is necessary.

For more quotes and insights, download the Bitbucket Server report

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration.

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 19.9%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 8.0%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitbucket Server	19.9%
GitHub	8.0%
Other	72.1%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Provides strong code management and tracking features for development teams

Section Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

We use Bitbucket Server in the company. Since I'm not using Bitbucket Server every day, it's more my technicians, developers, and engineers using it. I would need to talk with them first. We use Jira integration with Bitbucket Server, but I'm running out of time. I would need to discuss the satisfaction with these integrations with my technical product owners because they are more involved in this than I am right now. I believe installing Bitbucket Server is quite easy, but I'm not doing the installation or integration. I'm just working with other people who do that. I couldn't provide points for technical support because I haven't been in contact with them much. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bitbucket Server an 8.

Read full review

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user185772

Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2015

GitHub vs. GitLab vs. BitBucket Server (Formerly Stash)

Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/10/16/github-vs-gitlabs-vs-bitbucket-server-formerly-stash/ This article will try to compare GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket Server (previously called Stash) installed on your own servers. Similar comparison of cloud offerings is outside…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

There are absolutely things that could be improved in collaboration features in Bitbucket Server, with respect to people who are not using it every day, such as managers who need to be able to appr...

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use Bitbucket Server for storing code. It is a way to manage configuration items, keep track of code, commits, and pull requests.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 85% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

Git vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

September 2025

Download GitHub product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Overview

Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.

Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration with CI/CD pipelines and traceability features enhances its functionality. Though there are areas requiring improvement such as remote site capabilities, granular access control, and support for large files, it remains a vital tool for code management, version control, and repository management in the CI/CD ecosystem, often utilized alongside Jenkins, Bamboo, and Jira. It supports software development processes such as task tracking and issue logging.

What are the key features of Bitbucket Server?

Seamless Integration: Integrates with Jira and Jenkins for enhanced workflow.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for simplicity and ease of use.
Robust Code Collaboration: Supports branching and pull requests.
Scalability and High Availability: Reliable across all project sizes.
CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Streamlines deployment processes with CI/CD tools.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Development Support: Provides extensive resources for aiding development.
Flexibility in Workflows: Adaptable to different project needs.
Permission Management: Effective control over user access.
Code Quality Maintenance: Ensures high standards in code management.
Traceability: Offers excellent tracking features for seamless integration.

In industries with strong development focus, Bitbucket Server plays a critical role in managing code versions and repositories. It supports agile planning and DevOps practices, enabling organizations to streamline code integration and task management efficiently. Companies benefit from its robust features, especially in complex software development environments.

Atlassian

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent