Bitbar and CrossBrowserTesting are competing in the software testing category. Despite Bitbar's competitive pricing, CrossBrowserTesting has the upper hand with its robust features.
Features: Bitbar offers strong support for mobile testing, along with integration with various CI/CD tools and adaptability for mobile-first environments. CrossBrowserTesting provides extensive browser testing capabilities, real-time testing on a wide range of browsers, and automation features, offering feature versatility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbar is known for a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service with prompt assistance and detailed documentation. CrossBrowserTesting focuses on usability and efficient customer support with a variety of self-help resources, offering a slightly more comprehensive support framework.
Pricing and ROI: Bitbar offers a cost-effective setup with a flexible pricing model, allowing for scalable solutions and significant ROI, especially in mobile testing environments. CrossBrowserTesting is more premium in pricing, providing a worthwhile return through its extensive features and browser coverage.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Bitbar | 0.9% |
| CrossBrowserTesting | 0.9% |
| Other | 98.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
