Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bamboo vs Tekton comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Organizations saw significant ROI with Bamboo through cost savings, efficient development, and minimal maintenance expenses leading to financial benefits.
Sentiment score
6.9
Tekton provides significant cost and time savings, enhancing scalability and efficiency compared to Jenkins with cloud-native features.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Atlassian Bamboo support is generally effective and responsive, though some users report delays and prefer direct communication methods.
Sentiment score
6.5
Tekton's support is effective with commendable Red Hat assistance, and many find community resources sufficient for issue resolution.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
Bamboo is scalable with variable cost-effectiveness, best for enterprises with 200-500 users, but smaller setups face challenges.
Sentiment score
6.8
Tekton excels in scalability within Kubernetes, but requires customization and improved resource allocation for seamless integration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Bamboo is robust and stable, with rare issues mainly due to configuration, effectively resolved by support and updates.
Sentiment score
7.0
Tekton is praised for stability and integration with Kubernetes, though configuration and resource management issues can affect performance.
Stability-wise, it is very stable, and we can seamlessly integrate.
 

Room For Improvement

Bamboo struggles with usability, limited integration, and support, hindering build customization, deployment efficiency, and modern workflows.
Tekton needs better tool integration, flexible pipelines, improved UI, enhanced APIs, and comprehensive documentation for easier use.
Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run.
 

Setup Cost

Bamboo's enterprise pricing varies by agent count and subscription needs, with costs cited from $2,000 to $120,000 annually.
Tekton is a cost-effective, open-source tool for Kubernetes environments, offering savings over licensed alternatives like Jenkins.
 

Valuable Features

Bamboo excels in integration, flexibility, and customization, offering affordable CI/CD solutions with user-friendly UI and multi-platform support.
Tekton excels in Kubernetes integration, scalability, and automation, streamlining CI/CD with flexibility and compatibility for diverse workflows.
A proper DevOps engineer can help once or twice, and development teams can easily adapt to that, make small shell script changes in the steps, understand the process, and work with it.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tekton
Ranking in Build Automation
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 6.0%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 11.5%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for continuous deployment, but the stability must be improved
The setup is moderately difficult. It is not highly complicated, but it is not easy. We must go through some steps to complete the implementation. Once the product is implemented, it will be stable. We face some challenges since the tool is deployed on-premise. The capabilities are adequate for our needs, though.
Prasad Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient CI/CD management with significant cost reduction and a user-friendly setup
One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user217035 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2015
Bamboo vs. Jenkins
A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?
Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.
What needs improvement with Bamboo?
Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins we...
How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...
What do you like most about Tekton?
Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.
What needs improvement with Tekton?
Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture
Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.