Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Netlify Platform comparison

Microsoft and Netlify are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netlify users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

563 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netlify Platform

Read 6 Netlify Platform reviews

100% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Netlify Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2026

Azure Red Hat OpenShift and Netlify Platform compete in cloud-based application hosting. Based on comparisons, Azure Red Hat OpenShift has an edge with robust enterprise features while Netlify Platform offers benefits in ease of use and modern web app capabilities.

Features: Azure Red Hat OpenShift is valued for scalability, integrated CI/CD, and multi-cloud environment support, making it ideal for complex enterprise solutions. Netlify Platform is praised for simplicity, seamless deployment, and modern JAMstack support, appealing to developers focused on dynamic web experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netlify Platform's deployment model is appreciated for straightforwardness, enabling quick deploys with minimal configuration. Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides a more elaborate deployment process, suitable for larger teams, with an extensive support network, beneficial for complex enterprise scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Red Hat OpenShift typically incurs higher setup costs, justified by enterprise-grade features and potential for extensive ROI in large-scale operations. Netlify Platform offers cost-effective solutions, enabling rapid development cycles, often leading to faster ROI in smaller projects where budget sensitivity is crucial.

To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (14th)

Netlify Platform

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

Kurmathi Reddy

Software Developer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Automated deployments have simplified portfolio updates and have reduced manual pipeline work

For the improvements in Netlify Platform, I think it should focus on better marketing because competitors like Vercel and others are present in the market. While Netlify Platform looks clean, neat, and enhanced, it should do better marketing, as it is actually recommended by ChatGPT for small-sized projects. I believe it should also be suggested for larger projects and promoted more so that Netlify Platform is used by multiple people; it should be the go-to cloud environment. I think the technical side of Netlify Platform can improve, especially in the documentation. They can add more information about new frameworks as they come into the platform or market. They should maintain a troubleshooting page on Netlify Platform docs that comprehensively shows all the steps. Adding more user-friendly animations or navigation would make the platform easier. Moreover, with the documentation, it currently shows all the tabs at one place, and the customer should understand what each use is without having to click into it. They should support more old frameworks as well, to increase the range of utilizations since mostly old frameworks are still in the market, prompting more users to migrate to Netlify Platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"The functions and features in Azure Red Hat OpenShift that I have found most valuable are that it is a platform that is baked into Azure, and since it is baked into Azure, it is managed operation by Azure, which takes out the complexity of the infrastructure management and day two operations when compared with on-premise OpenShift."

"As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"Netlify Platform was very feasible and we did not have to pay a very large sum of money to host our services."

"Netlify Platform has positively impacted my organization because the entire CI/CD pipeline in place becomes very easy to manage using Netlify."

"My main reason for preference over competitors like GitHub Pages and Vercel is its seamless integration with GitHub, where I can deploy directly from my development IDE using CLI commands, making it more efficient without having to manually link things."

"The best thing Netlify Platform has done for me is that it gives me velocity, taking away all the burden and time-consuming processes so I can move fast."

"Netlify Platform has positively impacted my organization and personal projects by making it easy for me to deploy my personal portfolio website without doing all the DevOps and CI/CD pipeline myself."

Cons

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"The product is expensive."

"Automation could be improved."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"I think Netlify Platform can be improved if it has the functionality to have a full back-end as well."

"Netlify Platform could be improved if they hosted their independent services apart from GitHub."

"While it also helps with backend deployment, it is not as scalable as AWS or Azure, and I would love to see and explore more features in the future around it."

"I think the technical side of Netlify Platform can improve, especially in the documentation."

"The pricing of Netlify Platform is acceptable for beginners but can become costly for intermediate users, as it can be high when CPU usage goes beyond a certain amount."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

30%

Government

21%

University

12%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netlify Platform?

Netlify Web Development Cloud does have limitations as it is not suitable for back-end heavy or long-running server applications, and its free tier imposes usage limits on bandwidth, build minutes,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Netlify Platform?

My main use case for Netlify Web Development Cloud is deploying my applications, such as deploying my personal applications so that everyone can access my made application through a link. I use Net...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Netlify Platform?

My advice for others looking into using Netlify Web Development Cloud is to highly recommend it for beginners and front-end developers wanting to understand modern deployment and CI/CD workflows, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Cloud Rewind (formerly Appranix) vs Netlify Platform

Compared 100% of the time

More Netlify Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

January 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download Netlify Platform product report

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Netlify Platform is a modern cloud tool for building and deploying web applications, offering efficient workflows and integration with popular services.

Netlify Platform streamlines the deployment of web projects by automating builds and managing infrastructure seamlessly. It caters to developers looking to simplify complex tasks with ease, allowing for swift integrations and fostering a smooth development lifecycle. Users benefit from features that accelerate production timelines, support team collaboration, and enable hassle-free scaling.

What features enhance Netlify Platform?

Continuous Deployment: Automatically deploy updates from your code repository for seamless integration.
Integrated CDN: Deliver content quickly and efficiently with built-in content delivery networks.
Serverless Functions: Build dynamic web applications with ease using serverless functions supported out-of-the-box.
Real-time Preview: Collaborate better with instant previews that reflect changes in real-time.
Custom Domain Management: Manage and configure custom domains directly through the platform.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Netlify Platform?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce infrastructure and operational costs significantly through effective automation.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes free up developer time, enhancing productivity.
Scalability: Easily scale applications to meet growing demands without hassle.
Improved Collaboration: Foster better team collaboration with tools that support shared workflows and real-time feedback.

In e-commerce, Netlify Platform helps retailers integrate personalized features quickly, adapt to seasonal traffic spikes, and maintain high performance. For tech startups, the platform supports rapid iterations and developmental agility needed in competitive markets, making it an industry favorite.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.