We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."The most valuable feature is the cluster engine."
"Break down your application into small modules to improve resiliency"
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"AWS cloud services are flexible and have thorough documentation. AWS also has data centers all over the world."
"We haven't faced any major issues in one and a half years of use."
"I like its auto-scale feature very much."
"Provides high performance and easy manageability."
"Amazon EKS is like Kubernetes, but it helps manage our nodes and scalability in AWS."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"Amazon EKS needs to improve customer operations and technical support."
"They need to work on the Amazon plugins on the Kubernetes cluster."
"It is very cumbersome to assign permissions to users to interact with a cluster."
"I'd like improved traffic handling and additional application details within the system."
"I would like Amazon EKS to be easier to configure on various environments like Windows or Linux installations"
"Amazon EKS is predominately public. However, the government has started to have a lot of interest in Kubernetes and is receiving more education on Kubernetes and Amazon EKS. If we can have the security of Amazon EKS align with the security that is set out by the government it would be much better."
"I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"The product is expensive."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
"Automation could be improved."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 38 reviews while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift, Amazon AWS and VMware Tanzu Application Service.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
