Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Private Link vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 10.0, while Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 0.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.
Azure Private Link
Read 1 Azure Private Link review
  • 94 Views
  • 48 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews
  • 3,251 Views
  • 2,184 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Azure Private Link both enhance connectivity and security within an organization's tech stack. Azure Private Link often holds the advantage due to its robust security and seamless Azure service integration.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides comprehensive API management solutions, integration capabilities, and efficient inter-system communication. Azure Private Link emphasizes private access to Azure services, strong data protection, and superior network security, making it a secure tech stack component.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft ensures straightforward deployment with strong support for quick implementation. Azure Private Link, integrated within the Azure ecosystem, has a complex initial setup due to network configurations, but Azure's extensive documentation can help overcome these challenges.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers competitive pricing with effective ROI due to its integration capabilities. Azure Private Link, while more expensive initially, provides substantial ROI through enhanced security and reduced downtime, making it a wise investment for security-focused organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Private Link
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
15th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Private Link is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 10.9%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Soumen Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
It acts as a dedicated VIP channel for communication between two private IP addresses, allowing only restricted users to access it
The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process. I would recommend to allow access to restricted public access and private endpoint functionality. Currently, it's either public or private, but having the option for both would be beneficial. This allows public users to work through the public channel and vice versa.
Read full review
Vijay Subramanyam - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Azure Private Link ensures that any kind of transaction or activity on the cloud uses private IPs and is detached from the external world, preventing malicious access."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"It can scale."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros
 

Cons

"The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market."
"The price could be improved."
"From a monitoring point of view, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve on tracking transactions."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."
"The solution has a high price."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."
"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."
"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."
More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Azure Private Link?
The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Private Link?
The client has hosted all of his data on cloud, whereas we work on-premises. On a specific request from the client we have transitioned to Azure cloud and hence, require Azure Private Link. This cl...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Azure Private Link?
It is highly recommended because it's efficient and easy to use to establish a secure and private route. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
See all answers
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
See all answers
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compared 18% of the time
Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Logo
Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compared 7% of the time
Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Logo
Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compared 6% of the time
ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Logo
ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compared 6% of the time
IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Logo
IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
April 2025
Azure Private Link reportDownload Azure Private Link product report
Buyer's Guide
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
April 2025
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reportDownload MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
 

Overview

Azure Private Link provides private connectivity from a virtual network to Azure platform as a service (PaaS), customer-owned, or Microsoft partner services. It simplifies the network architecture and secures the connection between endpoints in Azure by eliminating data exposure to the public internet.

Microsoft

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?
  • Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
  • API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
  • Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
  • Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
  • Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
  • Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
  • Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
  • Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
  • Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
  • Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
  • Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
  • Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
  • Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.