Azure Private Link vs Boomi iPaaS comparison

Microsoft and Boomi are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0, while Boomi is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 0.9% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Boomi’s 11.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Boomi users who would recommend it.

Azure Private Link

Read 1 Azure Private Link review

128 Views
128 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

Read 29 Boomi iPaaS reviews

3,775 Views
1,774 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Azure Private Link

Boomi iPaaS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Private Link and Boomi iPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Private Link

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Boomi iPaaS

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Private Link is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 11.6%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Soumen Dey

Technical Architect at LTIMindtree

It acts as a dedicated VIP channel for communication between two private IP addresses, allowing only restricted users to access it

The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process. I would recommend to allow access to restricted public access and private endpoint functionality. Currently, it's either public or private, but having the option for both would be beneficial. This allows public users to work through the public channel and vice versa.

Read full review

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Private Link ensures that any kind of transaction or activity on the cloud uses private IPs and is detached from the external world, preventing malicious access."

"The maturity of the product is significant."

"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."

"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."

"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."

"Boomi iPaaS makes it easy to organize ETL procedures that populate data warehouses."

"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."

"The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

Cons

"The setup of Azure Private Link within SQL Server could be made much easier. If there was a simple button for setup, that would be helpful. The process of setting up the private link and connecting the database with the correct naming convention is a complex process."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."

"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."

"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."

"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."

"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."

"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"It is an expensive platform."

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Azure Private Link?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Private Link?

The client has hosted all of his data on cloud, whereas we work on-premises. On a specific request from the client we have transitioned to Azure cloud and hence, require Azure Private Link. This cl...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Azure Private Link?

It is highly recommended because it's efficient and easy to use to establish a secure and private route. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year. It is affordable even for small customers, like a salon with a couple of branches.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Boomi iPaaS needs better source control. It is not as good as it could be in terms of managing versions and running what-if scenarios.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Azure Private Link

Compared 28% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Azure Private Link product report

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

July 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Boomi

Overview

Azure Private Link provides private connectivity from a virtual network to Azure platform as a service (PaaS), customer-owned, or Microsoft partner services. It simplifies the network architecture and secures the connection between endpoints in Azure by eliminating data exposure to the public internet.

Microsoft

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.