Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Key Vault vs CyberArk Certificate Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Azure Key Vault boosts ROI by enhancing security, reducing development efforts, and centralizing key management for better compliance.
Sentiment score
3.3
Venafi reduces outages, automates certificate distribution, saves costs, and improves efficiency with faster installations and reduced manual workload.
With Venafi, it wasn't about saving time but achieving functionality that was otherwise impossible, such as distributing certificates without manual intervention.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Azure Key Vault support is praised for responsiveness and reliability, with minor issues in reaching experts and clarity.
Sentiment score
5.6
CyberArk Certificate Manager support is efficient but has declined post-acquisition, with users praising services but suggesting improvements.
I have a strong relationship with Microsoft since we are one of their best clients in Spain.
The skill level of the support staff is also questionable.
Azure Key Vault's technical support by Microsoft Azure is very good.
Inquiries are typically addressed the same day, with most issues, even complex ones, resolved within 24 hours.
Venafi's technical support is excellent, with even their first-tier support being in-house and highly competent.
Their technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, making Venafi stand out among other CyberArk products.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure Key Vault's scalability, seamless regional integration, and suitability for all business sizes receive high praise despite some dependency concerns.
Sentiment score
4.9
Venafi is scalable across environments, with strong cloud performance, valued for access control and integration, despite setup challenges.
This role-based access control enhances scalability and efficiency by providing a focused view of necessary information.
Horizontal scaling is a necessity rather than vertical scaling.
Scalability with Venafi is good; you can definitely use it if you have ten thousand certs, a thousand certs, a million, or a couple million.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Azure Key Vault is highly reliable and stable, with minimal issues, ideal for critical applications with high availability.
Sentiment score
5.4
CyberArk Certificate Manager is stable and dependable, with minimal issues and high user satisfaction compared to alternatives.
Venafi's stability has been consistently reliable.
Venafi is a stable product. It's definitely more stable than others.
For stability, I'd rate it around six out of ten since we experience some outages despite the investment.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Key Vault needs better key rotation, mobile access, integration, interface, cost, vendor support, and disaster recovery features.
CyberArk Certificate Manager requires interface improvements, better cloud integration, expanded automation, and enhanced documentation for user-friendly and secure management.
My security area wants to rotate passwords every day, every week, or every month, depending on the services.
One of our certificates was not getting deployed, and during that time, the support team was unsure and had to connect with the back-end team for assistance.
The skill level of the support staff is also questionable.
Expanding the range of out-of-the-box integrations would significantly improve the user experience.
The yearly DNS verification required by certificate authorities necessitates manual intervention, hindering full automation.
They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns.
 

Setup Cost

Azure Key Vault is seen as affordable with a pay-as-you-go model, though pricing opinions vary among users.
Venafi pricing is competitive but complex, with costs for public CA services, requiring a three-year commitment.
I would classify it as low priced.
The pricing of Azure Key Vault is nominal, not that expensive.
We are planning to buy protection for Entra.
Venafi offers good value for the cost.
The pricing has increased for us, impacting our organization due to its operational expenditure (OPEX).
For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Key Vault offers secure, scalable key management with seamless Azure integration and comprehensive access control for enhanced security.
Venafi enhances operational efficiency with certificate discovery, automation, and integration, offering ease of use, compliance, and seamless management.
All secrets are in the Key Vault, and access is managed by the integrated management in ITT, which Azure provides to the services.
It also helps me increase my security posture and assists with regulatory and compliance requirements.
Since implementing Azure Key Vault, I have observed that instead of storing plain values, we can store them securely as and when required.
The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error.
It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices.
What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Key Vault
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (1st), Certificate Management Software (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (13th)
CyberArk Certificate Manager
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (8th)
 

Featured Reviews

Rajthilak BS - PeerSpot reviewer
Have addressed compliance challenges but still struggle with seamless integration of certificate issuance between environments
In terms of Azure Key Vault improvements, we have to compare the competitor. If we consider AWS, our bank has Microsoft PKI, which is a Microsoft product, for the entire digital certificate infrastructure. Even in the cloud, when it is AWS, the internal certificates are MS PKI. When we had a problem, users had to come to on-premise to get a certificate and import it to AWS Certificate Manager and assign it. We wondered why we could not issue the certificate directly from the cloud for cloud users. There was a simple way in AWS. They have a Private Certificate Authority (PCA) and Amazon Certificate Manager. Private Certificate Authority issues certificates to Amazon services. They also provide Amazon Certificate Manager to store and deploy certificates. These are two neat components - one is an issuer and another is storage and deployment solutions for certificates. With PCA, I can directly enable it and get certificates from AWS itself. AWS can issue SSL/TLS certificates if you enable it directly. If you consider Azure, it is not very clear. Even the naming convention, Key Vault, might not suggest that this is a PKI or certificate manager. You cannot issue certificates directly. They have app certificates and did not have a clear-cut certificate management solution in the cloud when I worked at that time. I am not sure whether they have updated Azure Key Vault as a full-fledged PKI solution now. From what I saw, it was not a full-fledged PKI solution. We are not majorly using Azure Key Vault because it is only for storing secrets. If some solutions can provide guidance on how we can maximize leverage, we can immediately look forward to doing that. We already have some business problems we want to solve. While our primary focus is AWS, many of the services such as ADO are running on Azure, and the secondary services are growing bigger.
Adam Goldstein - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support
Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Certificate Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Key Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
Azure Key Vault is a SaaS solution. You can easily store passwords and secrets securely and encrypt them. Azure Key Vault is a great solution to ensure you are compliant with security and governanc...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Key Vault?
With Azure Key Vault, we can generate our own keys and then import them inside the system, which provides a higher level of security than provider-managed keys.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Key Vault?
The setup cost is low, as my usage is not extensive. I would classify it as low priced.
What do you like most about Venafi?
We use Venafi for PKI certificates.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?
For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi. With the to...
What needs improvement with Venafi?
As an end user, I cannot specifically point out improvements, but I believe it would be beneficial to display active certificates in a separate column on the UI, so users can easily find what they ...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Key Vault, MS Azure Key Vault
Venafi
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, DriveTime, Johnson Controls, HP, InterContinental Hotels Group, ASOS
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Certificate Manager vs. Azure Key Vault and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.