No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Functions vs Google App Engine comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Functions
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
25th
Average Rating
4.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google App Engine
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

GM
Product Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Faced timeouts and complexity but have automated Python data processing in the cloud
Elastic Pool is basically a SQL server that can host multiple SQL databases, not Azure Elastic SAN or just Elastic. Elastic Pool has nothing to do with the ELK stack. A Storage Account is called the file storage, and it is like an S3 from Azure. The file storage is indeed called a Storage Account. I am not actively working on Active Directory or any solutions like App Logic from Azure. I am not using ML Studio or Data Box. For pricing, I would say it is also a bit more expensive than normal, and I would rate it four as well. I would give this review an overall rating of four out of ten.
RK
Senior Engineer at Brillio
Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities
The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Azure Functions has a quite easy and straightforward initial setup."
"Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine."
"The product's setup and deployment phases are easy."
"The zero infrastructure management is valuable, allowing me to focus on the code rather than the service."
"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward, considering that there is good documentation explaining the implementation part of it."
"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."
"The solution is serverless, so we don't have to operate it."
"Administering App Engine from a user's perspective is simple with their very intuitive dashboards."
 

Cons

"Microsoft can improve Azure Functions by adding durable functions, as the current setup times out after thirty minutes, which is quite irritating."
"When it comes to billing, I think they should include something that would give the client or user an indication of what's happening so they can be aware of how pricing is being managed."
"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment."
"I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it."
"There needs to be more directions in terms of how to use the solution."
"More expensive than the alternate options if a product/service has a lot of users."
"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies."
"I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five."
"Some clients don't use it because Google is very unstable with their products. Google has terminated many promising products in the past, and some clients have stated, 'This is from Google, we don't trust it because Google can change their mind any day.'"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."
"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
9%
University
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Azure Functions?
I have not integrated Azure Functions with any third-party solutions outside of the Azure environment. I have not integrated CI/CD with Azure Functions. Microsoft can improve Azure Functions by add...
What is your primary use case for Azure Functions?
Azure Functions is used to host a Python script that requires about five minutes of processing. I am only using Azure Functions for Python scripts and am not hosting multiple languages, so I do not...
What advice do you have for others considering Azure Functions?
Elastic Pool is basically a SQL server that can host multiple SQL databases, not Azure Elastic SAN or just Elastic. Elastic Pool has nothing to do with the ELK stack. A Storage Account is called th...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?
I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.
What needs improvement with Google App Engine?
The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...
What is your primary use case for Google App Engine?
My primary use case for Google App Engine is within the finance industry, dealing with enterprise-scale businesses.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.