Google App Engine vs Heroku comparison

Read 29 Heroku reviews

1,938 Views
1,744 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and Heroku are competing cloud platform services, each offering distinct advantages. Google App Engine holds the upper hand in scalability and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, making it a strong contender for enterprises embedded in the Google ecosystem. Heroku shines with its simplicity and developer-friendly interface, making it a popular choice among smaller teams for its ease of use.

Features: Google App Engine offers robust scalability, automatically managing resources with its pay-as-you-go model. It supports multiple languages such as Python, Java, and Node.js. A key advantage is its integration with various Google Cloud services, providing a comprehensive cloud solution. Heroku's value lies in its simple deployment process and extensive add-on ecosystem, making it easily extendable. Its continuous integration and application deployment features are highly praised, particularly for Node.js and Ruby on Rails environments.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance user experience with a more intuitive deployment process and reduce complexities in configuration. Increasing flexibility, such as offering equivalent services for different app needs, would be beneficial. Heroku, while easy to use, may suffer from higher costs at scale; optimizing costs for larger deployments would be advantageous. Its free tier limitations and add-on pricing could be areas for reevaluation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku provides an intuitive deployment process using Git, supporting CI/CD workflows with straightforward rollback capabilities and accessible documentation. Its customer service efficiently supports smaller organizations. Google App Engine's deployment process is more complex but offers powerful customizations. It provides enterprise-level customer support with comprehensive SLA options.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine offers flexible pricing suited for scalable applications with sustained discounts for long-running services. Heroku uses dyno hour-based pricing with clear tiered options. Though Heroku can incur higher costs at scale, its ease of use may justify the expense for rapid development. Google App Engine provides better ROI for companies leveraging extensive cloud services and requiring scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Heroku Report (Updated: December 2025).

Google App Engine vs. Heroku

Download the complete report

Helped 879,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heroku is 3.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google App Engine	2.4%
Heroku	3.5%
Other	94.1%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

Faizan Haider

Senior Software Engineer at Aldaim Solutions

Used for server deployment and provides auto maintenance of databases

Heroku is deployed on the cloud. We can deploy our private and public projects over at Heroku. Most of the time, when we are starting any new project from scratch, we have to implement our MVP for that project or the core idea. We are unsure how our traffic flow will go or the actual production environment requirements. We don't want to spend the most on the server sites, so then we can use it with our go-to plan for Heroku, and all the resources are available in the basic plan with the minimum expenses. So, it helps us to deploy and make our features available online at the minimum cost. Once we know our needs, we can add the professional add-ons and shift it to another platform. Heroku supports any resource listed in the marketplace. We just have to deploy our AI solutions, and Heroku can also support AI projects. I would recommend the solution to other users. I advise users not to purchase extra add-ons but to make scalable resources so that they can use all the resources efficiently. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications."

"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."

"The auto-scaling feature helped us significantly in our fast-paced environment where the number of users was increasing rapidly."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"I've noticed measurable benefits and return on investment by choosing Google App Engine."

"The product's setup and deployment phases are easy."

More Google App Engine pros

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us."

"The product is stable."

"One of the best things about Heroku is that it is very easy and straightforward to deploy an application."

"I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"One drawback is that the app needs to be written to be compatible with Google App Engine, making it not cloud agnostic, hindering straightforward migration to other platforms such as AWS."

"Google Cloud support for Google App Engine is very poor, with unresponsive and unaware agents. It took them almost a month to inform me that SSH is not possible with private instances."

"Data consumption of the device could be improved."

"The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages."

"Currently, we have to use Google CLI and utilize Google App CLI SDKs for deployment. If options were available to enable these SDKs for Terraform and CloudFormation, it would be more helpful for executing one-click deployments."

"There are two versions of Google App Engine: flexible and standard versions. I think they can improve by having only one version."

"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed."

"I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it."

More Google App Engine cons

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"Its price is very good."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"The tool is free."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google App Engine?

The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

What do you like most about Heroku?

I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 7% of the time

Acquia Cloud vs Google App Engine

Compared 5% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Heroku

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 14% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 8% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

Google App Engine

Download Google App Engine product report

Download Heroku product report

Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

Google App Engine vs. Heroku