IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Google App Engine vs Heroku comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
4,867 views|4,150 comparisons
Heroku Logo
3,445 views|2,832 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Google App Engine vs. Heroku
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Heroku and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful.""I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time.""Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself."

More Google App Engine Pros →

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things.""The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides.""The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us.""Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS.""It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

More Heroku Pros →

Cons
"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers.""I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it.""I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops."

More Google App Engine Cons →

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure.""They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more.""Their support is good, but they can improve their response time.""We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert.""We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

More Heroku Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
  • More Google App Engine Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is very good."
  • "The price of Heroku could be less expensive."
  • More Heroku Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
    607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful.
    Top Answer:We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500. I would give the pricing a 2 on a scale of 1 to 5. The pricing is really not bad. The kill is that… more »
    Top Answer:I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops.
    Top Answer:The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us.
    Top Answer:I have an issue with the session server in terms of how it can scale, and where I can put my sessions. I know that there are some possibilities but I haven't found a solution for this problem yet. The… more »
    Top Answer:We primarily use Heroku for Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) and to build bots. It is also used for mobile web applications such as Telegram and WhatsApp. The websites are used for a variety of use cases… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 31 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    4,867
    Comparisons
    4,150
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    281
    Rating
    8.0
    8th
    out of 31 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    3,445
    Comparisons
    2,832
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

    Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

    Offer
    Learn more about Google App Engine
    Learn more about Heroku
    Sample Customers
    Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
    Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Media Company29%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Non Profit14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    University6%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business86%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Google App Engine vs. Heroku
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Heroku and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google App Engine is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 3 reviews while Heroku is ranked 8th in PaaS Clouds with 5 reviews. Google App Engine is rated 8.0, while Heroku is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google App Engine writes "Shared drive allows for communication, collaboration, and documentation in our company". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Heroku writes "Easy to configure and use, easily expandable with a variety of plugins, and helpful technical support". Google App Engine is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Amazon Lightsail and IBM Public Cloud, whereas Heroku is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Amazon Lightsail, Salesforce Platform and OpenShift. See our Google App Engine vs. Heroku report.

    See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

    We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.