Google App Engine vs Heroku comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Google and Heroku are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Heroku is ranked #16. Google holds a 2.3% mindshare in PSP, compared to Heroku’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Heroku users who would recommend it.

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

3,460 Views
3,079 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Heroku

Read 29 Heroku reviews

3,798 Views
3,494 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Heroku

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and Heroku are competing cloud platform services, each offering distinct advantages. Google App Engine holds the upper hand in scalability and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, making it a strong contender for enterprises embedded in the Google ecosystem. Heroku shines with its simplicity and developer-friendly interface, making it a popular choice among smaller teams for its ease of use.

Features: Google App Engine offers robust scalability, automatically managing resources with its pay-as-you-go model. It supports multiple languages such as Python, Java, and Node.js. A key advantage is its integration with various Google Cloud services, providing a comprehensive cloud solution. Heroku's value lies in its simple deployment process and extensive add-on ecosystem, making it easily extendable. Its continuous integration and application deployment features are highly praised, particularly for Node.js and Ruby on Rails environments.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance user experience with a more intuitive deployment process and reduce complexities in configuration. Increasing flexibility, such as offering equivalent services for different app needs, would be beneficial. Heroku, while easy to use, may suffer from higher costs at scale; optimizing costs for larger deployments would be advantageous. Its free tier limitations and add-on pricing could be areas for reevaluation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku provides an intuitive deployment process using Git, supporting CI/CD workflows with straightforward rollback capabilities and accessible documentation. Its customer service efficiently supports smaller organizations. Google App Engine's deployment process is more complex but offers powerful customizations. It provides enterprise-level customer support with comprehensive SLA options.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine offers flexible pricing suited for scalable applications with sustained discounts for long-running services. Heroku uses dyno hour-based pricing with clear tiered options. Though Heroku can incur higher costs at scale, its ease of use may justify the expense for rapid development. Google App Engine provides better ROI for companies leveraging extensive cloud services and requiring scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Heroku Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Heroku

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,884 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heroku is 2.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google App Engine	2.3%
Heroku	2.8%
Other	94.9%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

Cristian-Molina

Senior Developer at Go Coeupas

Has a quick development cycle and continuous integration

The initial setup is straightforward. Heroku integrates well. You only have to push the code, and it automatically deploys the new version. Whether you have permission depends on the application. Currently, I have one application that I deploy myself. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful."

"The auto-scaling feature helped us significantly in our fast-paced environment where the number of users was increasing rapidly."

"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."

"The solution allows you to create apps right on Google."

"What I find most beneficial about Google App Engine is that we do not need to manage it since it's a fully managed serverless platform, allowing us to spend more time on development rather than managing and maintaining configurations."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"I have found it useful in my work and life."

More Google App Engine pros

"They solve most of our problems and we don't experience many issues with them."

"Easy, fast, fun, and extendable."

"I like the operations of the product because it makes it easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"Deploying with git, npm install git hook ... basically, they got it right for nodejs servers hosting."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."

"Some clients don't use it because Google is very unstable with their products. Google has terminated many promising products in the past, and some clients have stated, 'This is from Google, we don't trust it because Google can change their mind any day.'"

"Data consumption of the device could be improved."

"The initial setup is complex as it is customized based on different clients, and it can range from one to three years, requiring niche-specific technical resources."

"One drawback is that the app needs to be written to be compatible with Google App Engine, making it not cloud agnostic, hindering straightforward migration to other platforms such as AWS."

"Once you think of migrating out of the AppEngine world, you'll face a lot of problems."

"There are two versions of Google App Engine: flexible and standard versions. I think they can improve by having only one version."

More Google App Engine cons

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"It's pricing is a little high and could be lowered."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"Slow restart on servers"

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The tool is free."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"Its price is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google App Engine?

My primary use case for Google App Engine is within the finance industry, dealing with enterprise-scale businesses.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 15% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Google App Engine

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 4% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 9% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 8% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Virtuozzo Application Platform vs Heroku

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Heroku

Compared 5% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

October 2026

Download Google App Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

Heroku

October 2026

Download Heroku product report

Also Known As

GAE

No data available

Overview

Google App Engine offers seamless platform integration, automatic scaling, and zero infrastructure maintenance, enhancing development efficiency. Its serverless architecture with robust security measures supports diverse programming needs and simplifies deployment, making it a top choice for modern applications.

Designed for effortless web application deployment and API management, Google App Engine integrates smoothly with Google Cloud services, offering automatic scaling without the burden of infrastructure upkeep. Developers enjoy a cost-effective serverless platform that optimizes performance and reduces operational workload. Despite its intuitive interface and real-time logging advantages, areas needing improvement include documentation and community engagement. Expansion on language support, technical backing, pricing strategies, error logging, and advanced deployment tools is essential. Scalability and control flexibility require attention to resolve performance and customization issues. Enhancing migration paths and security features would significantly boost user satisfaction and platform reliability.

What are Google App Engine's most important features?

Seamless Integration: Connects efficiently with Google Cloud services and supports diverse languages.
Automatic Scaling: Adjusts resources in response to traffic variations, optimizing performance.
Zero Maintenance: No server management, freeing developers to focus on code.
Real-Time Logging: Provides instant insights to improve debugging and monitoring.
Cost-Effective: Offers a budget-friendly, scalable serverless environment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Effortless handling of backend service demands without manual intervention.
Security: Reliable protective measures safeguarding application data.
Integration: Simplified authentication with Google services, enhancing productivity.
Support: Assistance for cloud migration and SaaS applications in diverse industries.

Industries like finance and manufacturing utilize Google App Engine for cloud migration and scaling SaaS applications efficiently. Its ability to seamlessly integrate with services like Pub/Sub and Stackdriver supports complex projects, while cloud-native tools like Cloud Run and Kubernetes Engine facilitate microservice communication.

Google

Heroku offers fast deployment with ease of use and seamless integration capabilities, making it a preferred platform for developers needing reliable continuous integration and scalability.

Heroku is known for handling server-related tasks, allowing developers to concentrate on building application functionality. Its automatic database maintenance and powerful performance are key for projects using Node.js and Ruby on Rails. Users appreciate its simple application deployment and maintenance, supported by a diverse range of plugins. Beyond efficiency, its CLI and dashboards enable a straightforward user experience, essential for developers focused on production, staging, and development environments.

What are Heroku's key features?

Fast Deployment: Offers rapid application deployment with minimal setup.
Continuous Integration: Supports streamlined integration processes for development cycles.
Scalability: Easily scales applications to meet growing demand.
High Availability: Ensures applications remain online and responsive.
Automatic Database Maintenance: Provides hands-off management of database tasks.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex tasks, allowing developers to focus on coding.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with tools like GitHub for updates.
Performance: Delivers consistent, reliable application performance.
Development Flexibility: Supports Node.js, Ruby on Rails, and Docker environments.

Organizations use Heroku to deploy production servers and stage development environments. Educational apps and offsite backends benefit from its Docker support. E-commerce, mobile app development, and web apps leverage Heroku's ability to maintain rapid development cycles and manage server deployment efficiently.

Heroku

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine vs. Heroku

September 2026

Free Report: Google App Engine vs. Heroku

Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Heroku and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google App Engine vs. Heroku report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.