Google App Engine vs Heroku comparison

Read 29 Heroku reviews

2,787 Views
2,508 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and Heroku are competing cloud platform services, each offering distinct advantages. Google App Engine holds the upper hand in scalability and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, making it a strong contender for enterprises embedded in the Google ecosystem. Heroku shines with its simplicity and developer-friendly interface, making it a popular choice among smaller teams for its ease of use.

Features: Google App Engine offers robust scalability, automatically managing resources with its pay-as-you-go model. It supports multiple languages such as Python, Java, and Node.js. A key advantage is its integration with various Google Cloud services, providing a comprehensive cloud solution. Heroku's value lies in its simple deployment process and extensive add-on ecosystem, making it easily extendable. Its continuous integration and application deployment features are highly praised, particularly for Node.js and Ruby on Rails environments.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine could enhance user experience with a more intuitive deployment process and reduce complexities in configuration. Increasing flexibility, such as offering equivalent services for different app needs, would be beneficial. Heroku, while easy to use, may suffer from higher costs at scale; optimizing costs for larger deployments would be advantageous. Its free tier limitations and add-on pricing could be areas for reevaluation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku provides an intuitive deployment process using Git, supporting CI/CD workflows with straightforward rollback capabilities and accessible documentation. Its customer service efficiently supports smaller organizations. Google App Engine's deployment process is more complex but offers powerful customizations. It provides enterprise-level customer support with comprehensive SLA options.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine offers flexible pricing suited for scalable applications with sustained discounts for long-running services. Heroku uses dyno hour-based pricing with clear tiered options. Though Heroku can incur higher costs at scale, its ease of use may justify the expense for rapid development. Google App Engine provides better ROI for companies leveraging extensive cloud services and requiring scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Heroku Report (Updated: April 2026).

Google App Engine vs. Heroku

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 895,990 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heroku is 3.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google App Engine	2.6%
Heroku	3.2%
Other	94.2%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Tabish Mahfuz

Senior Software Engineer at Cimpress

New feature experimentation becomes simple with intuitive service deployment

While integrating Google App Engine with other services, I don't recall any specific challenges. The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets. These issues could be resolved using the Flex environment, but that increased the cost. The Flex environment requires one service instance to always be running, which further increases the service cost. It would be beneficial if Flex services could scale down to zero instances during periods of no traffic. This would solve many issues where we had to make compromises because we didn't want to maintain a constantly running instance while still needing the flexibility of WebSockets or low-level system APIs that weren't available in the standard environment. Though I have experience with AWS, it's not comparable as I only used EC2 services, where you manage your own VM independently.

Read full review

Cristian-Molina

Senior Developer at Go Coeupas

Has a quick development cycle and continuous integration

The initial setup is straightforward. Heroku integrates well. You only have to push the code, and it automatically deploys the new version. Whether you have permission depends on the application. Currently, I have one application that I deploy myself. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Free Tier is basic if you simply want to test your development or if you are not sure whether the product you are trying to launch will be successful."

"The solution is serverless, so we don't have to operate it."

"The functions and features of Google App Engine that I have found most valuable are that it is serverless, and the learning curve is easy to follow."

"Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine."

"It is simple to use, much simpler than AWS, and also very powerful."

"The zero infrastructure management is valuable, allowing me to focus on the code rather than the service."

"Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications."

"The solution allows you to create apps right on Google."

More Google App Engine pros

"Lots of integrations"

"Valuable for us was the fast deployment. This means the time to market is improved without pain for developers."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"I like the operations of the product because it makes it easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"Easy, fast, fun, and extendable."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server, machines, servers, and hardware because we only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop while they take care of everything else."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"Data consumption of the device could be improved."

"There are two versions of Google App Engine: flexible and standard versions. I think they can improve by having only one version."

"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed."

"I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five."

"Currently, we have to use Google CLI and utilize Google App CLI SDKs for deployment. If options were available to enable these SDKs for Terraform and CloudFormation, it would be more helpful for executing one-click deployments."

"The initial setup is complex as it is customized based on different clients, and it can range from one to three years, requiring niche-specific technical resources."

"The main drawback with Google App Engine's standard environment was its restrictions. We could not work with file systems, run shell scripts from the environment, or use WebSockets."

"The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages."

More Google App Engine cons

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"Heroku is pretty stable. We experience the occasional outages."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"Plugins aren't cheap (Mailchimp is $1.5/1000 emails)."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"Slow restart on servers"

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"Its price is very good."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

895,990 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

What is your primary use case for Google App Engine?

My primary use case for Google App Engine is within the finance industry, dealing with enterprise-scale businesses.

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

What advice do you have for others considering Heroku?

The integration capabilities are great because of the quick integration and the management features. We don't need a lot of expertise and all external DevOps people. Heroku is the easiest platform ...

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine

Compared 5% of the time

Acquia Cloud vs Google App Engine

Compared 4% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Heroku

Compared 11% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 11% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 5% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

Download Google App Engine product report

Google App Engine

May 2026

Download Heroku product report

May 2026

Also Known As

GAE

No data available

Overview

Google App Engine offers seamless platform integration, automatic scaling, and zero infrastructure maintenance, enhancing development efficiency. Its serverless architecture with robust security measures supports diverse programming needs and simplifies deployment, making it a top choice for modern applications.

Designed for effortless web application deployment and API management, Google App Engine integrates smoothly with Google Cloud services, offering automatic scaling without the burden of infrastructure upkeep. Developers enjoy a cost-effective serverless platform that optimizes performance and reduces operational workload. Despite its intuitive interface and real-time logging advantages, areas needing improvement include documentation and community engagement. Expansion on language support, technical backing, pricing strategies, error logging, and advanced deployment tools is essential. Scalability and control flexibility require attention to resolve performance and customization issues. Enhancing migration paths and security features would significantly boost user satisfaction and platform reliability.

What are Google App Engine's most important features?

Seamless Integration: Connects efficiently with Google Cloud services and supports diverse languages.
Automatic Scaling: Adjusts resources in response to traffic variations, optimizing performance.
Zero Maintenance: No server management, freeing developers to focus on code.
Real-Time Logging: Provides instant insights to improve debugging and monitoring.
Cost-Effective: Offers a budget-friendly, scalable serverless environment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Effortless handling of backend service demands without manual intervention.
Security: Reliable protective measures safeguarding application data.
Integration: Simplified authentication with Google services, enhancing productivity.
Support: Assistance for cloud migration and SaaS applications in diverse industries.

Industries like finance and manufacturing utilize Google App Engine for cloud migration and scaling SaaS applications efficiently. Its ability to seamlessly integrate with services like Pub/Sub and Stackdriver supports complex projects, while cloud-native tools like Cloud Run and Kubernetes Engine facilitate microservice communication.

Google

Heroku offers fast deployment with ease of use and seamless integration capabilities, making it a preferred platform for developers needing reliable continuous integration and scalability.

Heroku is known for handling server-related tasks, allowing developers to concentrate on building application functionality. Its automatic database maintenance and powerful performance are key for projects using Node.js and Ruby on Rails. Users appreciate its simple application deployment and maintenance, supported by a diverse range of plugins. Beyond efficiency, its CLI and dashboards enable a straightforward user experience, essential for developers focused on production, staging, and development environments.

What are Heroku's key features?

Fast Deployment: Offers rapid application deployment with minimal setup.
Continuous Integration: Supports streamlined integration processes for development cycles.
Scalability: Easily scales applications to meet growing demand.
High Availability: Ensures applications remain online and responsive.
Automatic Database Maintenance: Provides hands-off management of database tasks.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex tasks, allowing developers to focus on coding.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with tools like GitHub for updates.
Performance: Delivers consistent, reliable application performance.
Development Flexibility: Supports Node.js, Ruby on Rails, and Docker environments.

Organizations use Heroku to deploy production servers and stage development environments. Educational apps and offsite backends benefit from its Docker support. E-commerce, mobile app development, and web apps leverage Heroku's ability to maintain rapid development cycles and manage server deployment efficiently.

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.