Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google App Engine vs Microsoft Azure comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Google holds a 2.1% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 18.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Google App Engine
Read 35 Google App Engine reviews
  • 1,610 Views
  • 1,481 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure
Read 321 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 19,910 Views
  • 11,747 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Microsoft Azure and Google App Engine compete in the cloud computing category, offering diverse solutions. Azure has the upper hand due to its robust integration with other Microsoft services and its emphasis on enterprise support.

Features: Microsoft Azure is known for its robust infrastructure, excellent scalability, and rich support for hybrid environments. Its security and integration with Microsoft services like Active Directory stand out. The "pay as you go" model provides flexibility for diverse business needs. Google App Engine excels in application management, automatic scaling, and a developer-friendly environment. It supports open-source development and is cost-effective for Java applications, integrating smoothly with Google Cloud services.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure's complex pricing and navigation challenges are areas of criticism. Its interface could be more intuitive, and high costs for technical support are concerns. Google App Engine users seek better documentation, reduced cold start latency, and more security enhancements. They desire additional programming language support and smoother customization processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure benefits from a global data center reach but faces criticism for a complex setup and support structure, especially for lower-tier plans. Users find the interface daunting initially. Google App Engine is noted for simplicity and developer focus, offering efficient app deployment without heavy infrastructure management. However, its customer service can be less responsive compared to Azure.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure offers competitive pricing, particularly for enterprises using extensive Microsoft cloud offerings. Scalability is a benefit, though costs can be unpredictable. Google App Engine provides affordable entry-level pricing, advantageous for small to mid-range applications. Specific advanced features can increase costs, but the platform remains cost-efficient for front-end applications. Both emphasize ROI through reduced on-premises infrastructure needs, with Azure offering more services on higher-end plans.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
Google App Engine ROI varied, with cost reductions and efficiency gains, largely depending on user expertise and deployment strategies.
Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Azure reduces costs with scalable services, pay-as-you-go model, and improved infrastructure, enhancing long-term returns and performance.
Once we deployed this same application as part of Google App Engine, the cost drastically reduced to just $120 for the small instance we use for our development.
Operationally, it was efficient for us because we could easily spin up new versions to demonstrate new functionality without modifying the original environment.
Google App Engine offers discounts for high resource utilization, similar to committed use discounts for Compute Engine.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
SM
TM
Chandra Shekar Reddy Arrabolu - PeerSpot reviewer
HM
FP
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.6
Google App Engine support varies; some users praise quick help, while others experience delays, relying on documentation or tiered support.
Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Azure's support is often effective, yet some face delays; higher-tier support and self-help resources improve experiences.
They route us toward the appropriate team handling Google App Engine or other services, so when there is an issue, the respective team connects and provides support.
The technical support was very quick and responsive, with a direct team line available.
Technical support for Google App Engine is efficient and offers a brilliant solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
Microsoft needs to engage L3 and L2 in support when specified in service tickets.
The support from Microsoft Azure is good.
Regarding technical support from Microsoft, I find they are responsive and helpful, depending on which support package you're on.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
SM
reviewer2686491 - PeerSpot reviewer
RK
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
HM
JE
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Google App Engine is praised for its scalability, automatic scaling, seamless load handling, and integration with third-party applications.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure offers scalable solutions, but users face challenges with costs and resource limits, leading some to prefer competitors.
Google App Engine scales well in the standard environment, which automatically handles traffic without manual scaling.
Google App Engine is highly scalable and can integrate easily with other applications.
With automatic scaling, Google Cloud handles the scaling process, which leads to my high rating.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
It has different kinds of designs that allow for management and deployment in multi-zones, offering both scalable and non-scalable options.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
RB
KK
RK
JE
FP
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Users find Google App Engine stable and reliable, with rare network issues and minimal maintenance needed for consistent performance.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure is stable with good uptime, though stability varies by configuration; users generally rate it highly.
I have not experienced any crashing or instability with Google App Engine.
However, large code bases can still cause it to slow down.
I would rate the stability of Google App Engine a perfect 10 out of 10, as it is completely managed by Google.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
We noticed a few critical servers went down due to a Microsoft Azure-end hardware issue.
We are now migrating clients without the zoning into mandatory multi-zone deployments, so if one zone goes down, their application and database remain live.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
RB
KK
RK
reviewer1561173 - PeerSpot reviewerSyed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
KP
 

Room For Improvement

Google App Engine struggles with high costs, limited language support, complex migration, inadequate documentation, and restrictive platform features.
Microsoft Azure users seek simplified pricing, improved security, better integration, enhanced documentation, responsive support, and intuitive management tools.
It would be beneficial if Flex services could scale down to zero instances during periods of no traffic.
The pricing is higher compared to alternatives like Kubernetes and Compute Engine.
In the Flex environment, SSH access is not available for private instances.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
Recent outages and security issues are also a concern, causing a decrease in confidence, especially when partnering with third-party companies.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
TM
reviewer2686491 - PeerSpot reviewer
RB
KP
HM
JE
 

Setup Cost

Google App Engine offers flexible pricing, affordable for front-end applications, but costs rise with increased usage and advanced features.
Microsoft Azure provides flexible pricing with pay-as-you-go, free tiers, and discounts, emphasizing cost-effectiveness despite complexity.
For F1 usage with 256 MB, it is free.
My GCP billing is about 10 lakh INR per month, and Google App Engine contributes only 25,000 to 30,000 INR.
The pricing of Google App Engine largely depends on the features chosen; if we opt for the standard edition, it is less expensive, while the flexible option incurs more costs due to always having an instance running.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
They have discounts and also provide promotions for a three-year reservation which comes with significant discounts on the infrastructure part.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
reviewer2686491 - PeerSpot reviewer
RB
RK
KP
HM
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

Google App Engine provides serverless, scalable app development with easy integration, enhancing productivity and security without infrastructure management.
Microsoft Azure is praised for scalability, ease of use, diverse services, strong security, and seamless integration with various technologies.
The solution offers scalability, autoscaling based on user demand, and security, as Google manages all updates and security patches.
I also appreciate the Google App Engine standard environment because it handles traffic scaling without manual intervention.
Deploying code is straightforward without worrying about deployment or integration.
For more quotes and insights, download the Google App Engine report
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
If Microsoft gives a report, such as a server performance report in a detailed way, which shows what is consuming more CPU, memory, and disk IO, and network utilization during a particular time, it would be helpful to visualize that information.
What is very interesting in terms of scalability is the automatic possibilities to provision some new machines to be able to absorb the number of users we have in the system.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
reviewer2686491 - PeerSpot reviewer
RB
KK
KP
reviewer1561173 - PeerSpot reviewerSylvain CAILLAU - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Google App Engine
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
321
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 18.4%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure18.4%
Google App Engine2.1%
Other79.5%
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Chandra Shekar Reddy Arrabolu - PeerSpot reviewer
Effortless server management and automatic scaling boost productivity
The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often, issues must be escalated through support to product engineering teams who access internal logs for resolution. Increasing the visibility of logging would help users identify issues more easily. Regarding runtimes, the validity period limitations can be problematic. When companies use legacy applications, migrating to new versions requires significant code changes and isn't always a simple lift-and-shift operation. Google App Engine should consider continuing to provide security patches for legacy applications, especially for customers with substantial billing. The manual scaling feature needs improvement, as it isn't available for all runtimes. Adding this capability across all runtimes would be beneficial for controlling instance scaling within specific parameters.
Read full review
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience
For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business139
Midsize Enterprise53
Large Enterprise148
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google App Engine?
The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?
Google App Engine is affordable compared to other available platforms. The pricing structure is reasonable and not overrated.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google App Engine?
The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...
See all answers
Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
See all answers
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine Logo
Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
Compared 22% of the time
Heroku vs Google App Engine Logo
Heroku vs Google App Engine
Compared 13% of the time
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine
Compared 10% of the time
Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine Logo
Amazon Lightsail vs Google App Engine
Compared 5% of the time
Acquia Cloud vs Google App Engine Logo
Acquia Cloud vs Google App Engine
Compared 5% of the time
More Google App Engine Competitors
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 13% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 10% of the time
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 8% of the time
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 2% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Google App Engine
September 2025
Google App Engine reportDownload Google App Engine product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
August 2025
Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
 

Overview

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?
  • Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
  • Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
  • Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
  • Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
  • Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.
What benefits should users expect from Azure?
  • Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
  • Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
  • Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
  • Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Buyer's Guide
Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure
September 2025
Free Report: Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure
Find out what your peers are saying about Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google App Engine vs. Microsoft Azure report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.