"Amazon AWS is user-friendly and intuitive."
"The most valuable features are how stable and easy to use Amazon AWS is."
"It is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of Amazon AWS are the EC2 instance for web applications with CDN Networks."
"The most valuable features I have found are the Database Migration Service (DMS) for monitoring the host and routing, Route 53, and EC2 tools. The DMS is not available in any other solution that I am aware of. They have a very flexible and professional solution."
"This solution is used as the basic requirement for any virtual machines use cases, the storage is used for each use case."
"Cloud Management has been a valuable feature."
"It's easy to manage. We can use a wide range of technologies with AWS."
"I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."
"It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful."
"Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself."
"IAM only gives you one chance to capture your key."
"Some services which were easy to use through shortcuts are now more complicated to use."
"The solution can get to be a little expensive."
"As far as the automation is concerned, the backups should be scaled."
"The technical support should be better than what is on offer right now."
"We like everything about the solution except for the general price."
"I'd like to see integration with MySQL."
"I have trouble with the AWS command-line interface."
"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops."
"I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it."
"The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 173 reviews while Google App Engine is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 3 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Google App Engine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Flexible, scales well, and offers good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google App Engine writes "Shared drive allows for communication, collaboration, and documentation in our company". Amazon AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform, IBM Public Cloud and Dell ECS, whereas Google App Engine is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Heroku, Amazon Lightsail and IBM Public Cloud. See our Amazon AWS vs. Google App Engine report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
