No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Boards vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Boards
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Azure Boards?
Leave a review
JasonLiu1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at GE
Linking OKRs to financials has improved portfolio visibility and now drives faster agile delivery
Targetprocess offers several valuable features, including easy customization when required and ease of use for getting started, making it suitable for beginners. The reporting feature in Targetprocess provides a wide range of standard reports and has excellent ability to perform self-service reports for any needed scenario with slice and dice and filtering at all levels. Targetprocess is very easy to use. For beginners, screens and views are well-represented and easy to understand. Project portfolio management is easy, including budgeting, capacity planning, forecasting, and dashboards that are excellent. Targetprocess has positively impacted the organization, as visibility was a crucial deliverable. Agility health measures have increased by 30%. Feature cycle time, which is clearly measured across the ART, has improved by 50% over the past three years. The clearer and more effective measurable PI planning events are excellent, with the PI objectives achieved rate now at 80 to 90% versus 55% when starting. Measuring agility health and feature cycle time has been a fantastic part of the journey and growth, helping achieve high levels of maturity after years. Targetprocess was implemented early in the Agile journey and within six months, growth occurred with the tool, fundamentally assisting in configuring portfolios, understanding Agile ways and methodology, and allowing the creation of measures and reports much faster, fully integrated with Jira in a bi-directional way.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, Targetprocess is a bit expensive if it can be used by all team members, but for now, the price is manageable and cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
One area for improvement in Targetprocess is that costing can become substantial when wanting to use it across all teams. A needed improvement in Targetprocess would be to build deeper AI functiona...
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is leveraged to streamline workflows, manage resources efficiently, and ensure alignment with strategic objectives. A key feature is the ability to link OKRs directly to project finan...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, ServiceNow and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.