AWS Identity and Access Management vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and RSA are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while RSA is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in IAM, compared to RSA’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of RSA users who would recommend it.

AWS Identity and Access Man...

Read 12 AWS Identity and Access Management reviews

506 Views
460 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 10 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle reviews

854 Views
675 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

AWS Identity and Access Man...

RSA Identity Governance and...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and AWS Identity and Access Management compete in the identity management realm, where AWS Identity and Access Management seems superior due to its comprehensive integration and feature-rich capabilities, albeit at higher costs.

Features: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle provides strong identity analytics, policy management, and automated compliance reporting. AWS Identity and Access Management offers seamless AWS ecosystem integration, flexible permissions management, and scalability features.

Room for Improvement: RSA might improve in cloud-native features, integration ease with third-party systems, and scalability. AWS Identity and Access Management could enhance its on-premise capabilities, reduce complexity in advanced feature usage, and offer more personalized support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle offers an on-premise model with personalized support. AWS Identity and Access Management, as a cloud-based service, provides easy deployment and high availability, with service mainly reliant on online resources and forums.

Pricing and ROI: RSA involves higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI through compliance and security management benefits. AWS, cheaper initially due to its cloud nature, may incur higher ongoing costs for extensive usage but justifies ROI through scalability and integration benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Identity and Access Man...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Resource Access Management (4th)

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of AWS Identity and Access Management is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Identity and Access Management	0.5%
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.2%
Other	98.3%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

SumitMundik

Lead Admin Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

IAM improves cloud security management with hybrid network capabilities and global role access

In AWS Identity and Access Management solutions, CloudFormation tools are used to create templates. Having predefined templates available from the AWS team would be beneficial. Currently, security teams work on policies and scripts for creating generic AWS Identity and Access Management roles. If AWS could provide an option to automatically create templates based on desired access requirements, it would be extremely beneficial, especially for documentation and troubleshooting purposes. Storage gateway creation has limitations, allowing maximum of 50 SMB file shares per gateway. While it is costly to access S3 buckets via AWS Identity and Access Management role through storage gateway, companies invest in this for enhanced data security, particularly in financial sectors where data integrity is crucial. There is an ongoing issue where files are sometimes sent twice to S3 buckets, despite MoveIt logs showing single transmission. As a workaround, Lambda functions are implemented with a five-minute delay before processing files to downstream applications.

Read full review

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of control and the ability to manage group policies and individual policies are valuable features."

"A significant advantage is that unlike access keys and secret keys that require regular changes every 30-90 days based on organizational policy, AWS Identity and Access Management roles, once set up, do not require periodic changes."

"From my experience, AWS Identity and Access Management is a strong solution."

"I rate AWS Identity and Access Management ten out of ten."

"It also provides MFA, which adds an additional layer of security."

"The most beneficial aspect of AWS Identity and Access Management is the ability to manage security."

"Constructing permissions is easy and very robust; you have a lot of flexibility with IAM permissions, how you can define them, using wildcards, and you can have explicit deny, explicit allow, and different conditions that certain conditions have to be met that this IAM policy will be executed or respected."

"I rate AWS Identity and Access Management ten out of ten."

More AWS Identity and Access Management pros

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

"The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall."

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."

Cons

"There is an ongoing issue where files are sometimes sent twice to S3 buckets, despite MoveIt logs showing single transmission."

"Currently, the IAM solution does not allow one user to create multiple access and secret keys, which can be distributed in a diverse manner."

"The accessibility and inclusion of more AI features would greatly enhance the program."

"AWS IAM could be improved by providing a graphical user interface which would simplify permissions management, making it easier for beginners to quickly understand and manage permissions."

"I would like to see scalability improvements in AWS Identity and Access Management, such as better integration with existing systems and applications."

"The user activity tracking in AWS Identity and Access Management should be enhanced to provide detailed descriptions of user activities."

"The documentation and policies could be more straightforward."

"AWS Identity and Access Management has an intuitive user interface that is simple to use."

More AWS Identity and Access Management cons

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Identity and Access Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Identity and Access Management?

When attempting to access Windows UNC paths from MoveIt, it will request user ID and access. For instance, if ITS-MoveIt is the local user utilized during installation, that particular user should ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Identity and Access Management?

The AWS Identity and Access Management Access Analyzer is not utilized in our implementation. The policy simulator feature is also not being used. Information about the pricing aspect of AWS Identi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs AWS Identity and Access Management

Compared 52% of the time

Omada Identity vs AWS Identity and Access Management

Compared 24% of the time

JumpCloud vs AWS Identity and Access Management

Compared 24% of the time

More AWS Identity and Access Management Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 52% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 22% of the time

Saviynt vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Identity and Access Management

January 2026

AWS Identity and Access Management report

Download AWS Identity and Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

January 2026

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

Also Known As

No data available

SecurID

Overview

AWS Identity and Access Management offers comprehensive security controls like role-based access, MFA, and password management. It streamlines user permissions and integration with AWS services, focusing on efficiency and security with features such as flexible access options and global usability.

Organizations rely on AWS Identity and Access Management to manage secure authentication and authorize access across AWS services. This service supports cross-account scenarios and corporate directory integration, providing a secure, scalable, and efficient platform. Despite its strengths, improvements could be made with a graphical interface for permission management, better workload handling, and enhanced documentation. It offers robust policy-based controls and adapts to global usage without frequent updates.

What are the key features of AWS Identity and Access Management?

Role-Based Access Control: Define permissions based on roles to ensure secure access.
Multifactor Authentication (MFA): Enhance security with an additional authentication layer.
Password Controls: Manage passwords effectively to secure user accounts.
Integration with AWS Services: Seamlessly connect with EC2, S3, Lambda, and more.
Monitoring and Logging: Conduct comprehensive user activity monitoring and logging.
Cross-Account Access: Support and manage permissions across different AWS accounts.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating AWS Identity and Access Management?

Security and Efficiency: Protect resources while maintaining operational efficiency.
Scalability: Easily scale permission management as organizations grow.
Flexibility: Use temporary access options to adapt to changing needs.
Cost Optimization: Benefit from enhanced security policies and template options.

Industries implement AWS Identity and Access Management to manage user permissions and access policies across AWS services, focusing on secure authentication and authorization within teams. It is crucial for identity creation, role management, and policy controls in sectors like IT, healthcare, and finance, supporting diverse account structures for compliance and security.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.

RSA

Sample Customers

1. Amazon.com2. Adobe3. Accenture4. AT&T5. Bank of America6. Cisco Systems7. Coca-Cola8. Dell Technologies9. Equinix10. GE Healthcare11. Google12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise13. IBM14. Intel15. JPMorgan Chase16. Kroger17. LinkedIn18. Lockheed Martin19. Mastercard20. Microsoft21. Netflix22. Nike23. Oracle24. PayPal25. PwC26. SAP27. Siemens28. Spotify29. Tesla30. Toyota31. Visa32. Walmart33. World Bank

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Buyer's Guide

AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Identity and Access Management vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.