AWS CodeCommit vs Helix Core comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Perforce are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9, while Perforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.9% mindshare in VC, compared to Perforce’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 11 AWS CodeCommit reviews

1,040 Views
821 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Helix Core

Read 6 Helix Core reviews

338 Views
167 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Helix Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Helix Core and AWS CodeCommit are both popular version control systems with distinct advantages. AWS CodeCommit seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem and easier repository management.

Features: Helix Core offers powerful scalability, robust file management, and extensive functionalities for enterprise needs. AWS CodeCommit provides seamless integration with other AWS services, easy repository management, and cost-effectiveness for small to mid-sized projects.

Room for Improvement: Helix Core users mention a steep learning curve, occasional performance slowdowns, and complex deployment processes. AWS CodeCommit users point out limitations in branching capabilities, the need for improved notification systems, and potential integration issues outside the AWS ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Helix Core's deployment process is comprehensive but complex, often requiring dedicated support. AWS CodeCommit is praised for its straightforward deployment process. Both products have positive customer service ratings, though AWS CodeCommit receives higher marks for its self-serve options and AWS support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Helix Core users report higher initial setup costs but note long-term ROI due to extensive functionalities. AWS CodeCommit is noted for its cost-effectiveness, especially with its pay-as-you-go pricing model, which is favorable for budget management in small to mid-sized projects.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Helix Core

Ranking in Version Control

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Helix Core is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Daniel Kirschner

Technical Lead, Methods & Tools at Volkswagen

Configuration management features improve workflow but require a steep learning curve

I need to work more with Helix Core to identify specific areas for improvement. However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively. While its customization is not an issue, the GUI might not appeal to everyone.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The solution scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"The customer service is pretty good."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"I find the configuration management features of Helix Core particularly valuable."

"The customer service and support are excellent."

Cons

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"It has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

"However, it has an extensive feature set that leads to a steep learning curve, where users need to learn quite a bit of features to work with it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix Core?

Pricing is relatively moderate at three to four out of ten. I find this cost justified for the capabilities provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Helix Core?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Helix Core?

We use Helix Core in our software development processes as a configuration management solution. Our typical use cases include system-level configuration management, versioning software, and managin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 68% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 24% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Git vs Helix Core

Compared 71% of the time

Bitbucket vs Helix Core

Compared 29% of the time

More Helix Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit

June 2025

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

May 2025

Download Helix Core product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

Perforce

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Perforce, the Fast Software Configuration Management System, is a tool that versions and manages source code and digital assets for enterprises. Perforce is easy to install, learn and administer; seamlessly handles distributed development; and supports developers across a large number of platforms. Perforce ensures development integrity by grouping multi-file updates into atomic changes, enables concurrent development, and intelligently manages multiple software releases using its Inter-File Branching system.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Intuit, Disney, Nvidia, Ubisoft, Samsung, Vmware, Adidas, Pixar, salesforce.com, EA

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core

June 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Helix Core report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.