Avanan vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection comparison

The compared Avanan, a Check Point Company and Mimecast solutions aren't in the same category. Avanan, a Check Point Company is ranked #14 in Email Security , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 2.7% mindshare in the category. Mimecast is ranked #3 in SEG , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 17.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avanan, a Check Point Company users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Avanan and Mimecast are both competitors in the email security market. Avanan holds the upper hand due to its advanced AI capabilities and flexible pricing model, which appeals to organizations looking for cost-effective solutions while Mimecast is noted for its comprehensive email security measures but is often seen as expensive.

Features: Avanan provides advanced AI-based detection for identifying external threats, along with robust sandboxing and an easy deployment process, making it attractive to non-technical users. Mimecast is recognized for its email sandboxing and comprehensive email security, offering strong filtering services and traditional email gateway solutions.

Room for Improvement: Avanan users seek better integration with certain SaaS applications and refinements in AI logic to minimize false positives. Mimecast users express concerns over high costs and the need for simplified administrative features and a more intuitive interface, alongside a reduction in false positives in markets like India.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avanan is praised for its straightforward deployment across cloud environments and its responsive customer service. Mimecast, while versatile in deployment options, is perceived as more complex with customer service that is seen as prompt and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Avanan’s pricing is flexible, providing a clear ROI, especially appealing to smaller businesses, while offering transparency in threat reporting for increased trust. Mimecast’s pricing is often viewed as complicated and expensive, prompting some users to look for more cost-effective alternatives.

To learn more, read our detailed Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report (Updated: January 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

January 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 884,732 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

Email Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Avanan	2.7%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	8.8%
Proofpoint Email Protection	8.1%
Other	80.4%

Email Security

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection	17.1%
Proofpoint Email Protection	21.1%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	19.9%
Other	41.9%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Robert Melendez

Vice President Information Technology at Makeready

Enhances email security and has a very simple and easy-to-use UI

Spam protection is the most valuable feature. We have implemented the tool to enhance our email security. It helps prevent phishing attacks. The anomaly detection capabilities are baked into the security platform. The product integrates wonderfully with Microsoft 365. It's built right on a cloud platform and works almost natively. The solution has a very simple and easy-to-use UI. The tool appears extremely powerful and has a good solid feature set. It catches things that are bad for my environment. The user interface is good the way it is. If the solution continues down that path, I see no problems with the way it is going. It feels like a mature product.

Read full review

Test Logix

Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity

Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation

The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process. If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Enables me to work from two locations."

"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."

"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."

"The blocking feature is very good."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"Clover is the best product globally."

"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."

"Cloudflare Access is part of the Zero Trust philosophy."

More Cloudflare One pros

"The most valuable feature of Avanan is its effectiveness. When scanning incoming emails for threats it can in an automated fashion, quarantine suspicious attachments."

"It can retract unsafe emails and remove them from the entire communication channel."

"I like Avanan's SmartDLP module. It's seamless, and the administrative overhead is low. We aren't a very sophisticated operation. We just want to reduce our exposure, so we find ThreatCloud helpful. Avanan's acquisition by Check Point was beneficial for them."

"Email inspection has saved many employees from spam attacks and viruses from unauthorized sources."

"The customizable rules allow you to change aspects."

"Email Attachment Protection detects any insecure files and quickly blocks them to prevent the spread of viruses to other secure documents."

"The program has reduced the dangers related to phishing, malware, ransomware, and other vulnerabilities."

"The threat detection tools enable us to ascertain malware and phishing messages across the email network infrastructure."

More Avanan pros

"The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy."

"The product is good. To date, we have not faced any challenges."

"It has all the features required for distribution, such as the ability to mail."

"In terms of efficacy, Proofpoint is better than Mimecast, though it's a little difficult to manage."

"The Large File Send feature comes in handy when you have to send fairly large attachments."

"I recommend Mimecast based on customer requirements and budget."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"Due to our specialized use case, that HIPAA dictionary really comes in handy."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pros

Cons

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."

"Operating and tuning the product is difficult."

"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."

More Cloudflare One cons

"It should also offer a quick backup in case any email is wrongly quarantined or deleted to ensure no data loss."

"The user experience must be improved."

"The system response in a slow computing device affects performance when sending and receiving emails."

"The cost can be reviewed to enable SMEs to acquire it and enjoy great security features."

"Sometimes it seemed like the allow list wasn't working. I've created many allow list rules however, they still seem to be blocked; the same is true with the blocked list rules."

"The customer service team could come up with clear tutorials on how to use this platform to help new teams."

"It is complicated for new users unfamiliar with the modern cloud networking infrastructure."

"It should reduce the amount of time needed for thorough scanning."

More Avanan cons

"From an administrative point of view, Mimecast is a little bit cumbersome and difficult. It's not something that the end-user can easily find navigate themselves."

"The solution is very expensive."

"Certainly, the primary area needing improvement is Mimecast's customer support. Our experience as Mimecast customers has been less than satisfactory. Even when raising a priority ticket, the response time is unacceptably long, often taking around five to six hours. This level of service is disappointing. Additionally, there have been recurring service disruptions in the UK region, leading to extended email delays due to various service issues. This year alone, we've encountered such problems on approximately four occasions."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to similar solutions."

"Their support should be improved. They are notorious for sending you to knowledge-based articles rather than actually talking to you, but that is, unfortunately, kind of becoming a trend with everything. In terms of features, I haven't had any complaints. However, I don't like the fact they moved to a paid training subscription model. They used to have a lot of free webinars for training, but they have started to charge for them in the past year."

"The installation is not so straightforward."

"The feature that should be included is to remove the block on the encrypted files."

"The reaction time between a new threat being identified and Mimecast picking it up needs to be narrowed a bit."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"Having the flexibility and modeling to do the pricing that best fits the needs of the organization is incredibly ideal. That is what Avanan does. They know exactly how many users are using it, etc. We can tune the invoicing associated with how we are using the product so we can charge it back to the shows appropriately."

"The pricing of Avanan is reasonable."

"Good pricing arrangement as an SaaS offering."

"Avanan’s price is comparable to Barracuda."

"The product is not the cheapest in the market."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a ten."

"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."

"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."

"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."

"Two subscription options are currently offered: monthly and yearly. My suggestion is to opt for the yearly subscription as it can give some discount. The pricing isn't high as other cloud solutions are pricier than Microsoft's offerings."

"I'm always going to say the price needs to be lower, but it's reasonable."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Avanan?

Spam protection is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avanan?

Avanan’s price is comparable to Barracuda.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avanan?

Avanan doesn't cover certain tool segments. Barracuda provides backup and retention of emails and Microsoft 365’s bac...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other co...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be w...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Avanan

Compared 10% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Avanan

Compared 7% of the time

INKY Email Security Platform vs Avanan

Compared 7% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Avanan

Compared 6% of the time

More Avanan Competitors

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 19% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

March 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Avanan

March 2026

Download Avanan product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

March 2026

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report

Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

No data available

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Avanan offers advanced threat detection for protecting against phishing and malware, utilizing strong AI algorithms and seamless integration with platforms like Office 365. Its cloud-based, customizable security rules ensure efficient data protection suitable for diverse organizational sizes.

Avanan's platform is designed for email security across cloud and on-premises environments, protecting against threats like ransomware and DDoS attacks. With features such as real-time threat detection and advanced filtering, it integrates effortlessly with Microsoft 365. Organizations appreciate its user-friendly interface that allows for easy deployment and management. While possessing cost-effective qualities, Avanan might improve in SaaS integration, AI logic, and technical support with Check Point. Some users suggest enhancements like better mobile compatibility and faster threat response. The system's documentation and querying functionalities could also see refinement, addressing concerns for SMEs.

What are Avanan's key features?

Advanced Threat Detection: Quickly identifies phishing and malware.
Anti-Malware: Supports Office 365 and Box.com with strong AI algorithms.
Sandboxing Capability: Quarantines suspicious emails efficiently.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with tools like Office 365 and Slack.
Customizable Security: Offers cloud-based, always-on protection.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Effectiveness: Ideal for organizations of all sizes.
Ease of Implementation: Quick and easy setup process.
User-Friendly Management: Simplifies threat management and data protection.
Enhanced Data Protection: Comprehensive security across environments.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Avanan is implemented widely to protect sensitive communications and ensure compliance with data protection regulations. Its flexibility makes it suitable for sectors requiring robust security measures, leveraging cloud-based solutions for real-time threat mitigation and data leak prevention.

Avanan, a Check Point Company

Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers advanced features like sandboxing, email archiving, and phishing protection. It's known for integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly admin management, making it a robust choice for secure communications.

Focused on safeguarding emails, Mimecast Advanced Email Security integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, providing features such as sandboxing, spam filtering, and email archiving. It delivers comprehensive protection against phishing, identity threats, and impersonation attempts. Administrators benefit from the ability to monitor external communications and customize configurations, enhancing email security. Users appreciate the intuitive admin console and responsive support team. Although it faces challenges in threat detection rates and administration complexity, its capabilities in email monitoring, spam filtering, and URL inspection remain valued by enterprises seeking reliable email security that supports compliance needs.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Analyzes attachments in a secure environment to detect threats.
Email Archiving: Provides secure long-term storage of emails for compliance.
Spam Filtering: Prevents unsolicited emails from clogging the inbox.
URL Inspection: Checks links in emails for malicious content.
Phishing Protection: Guards against deceptive tactics to protect sensitive data.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to standards such as HIPAA.
Integration: Enhances existing systems with seamless Microsoft 365 integration.
Support: Offers a responsive support team to resolve issues promptly.
Email Security: Improves threat prevention with effective spam and phishing protections.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is implemented across industries to protect against email threats like phishing, spam, and malicious attachments. It serves as both a gateway and an archiving tool, supporting compliance in healthcare and finance by offering features like URL protection and data loss prevention. Enterprises leverage its capabilities to secure inbound and outbound communications effectively.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

23andMe

Bethel School District, ServiceSource, Capital Caring

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

Buyer's Guide

Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

January 2024

Free Report: Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: January 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avanan vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.