AutoSys Workload Automation vs Rocket Zena comparison

Broadcom and Rocket Software are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rocket Software is ranked #20. Broadcom holds a 9.9% mindshare in WA, compared to Rocket Software’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rocket Software users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 84 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,325 Views
5,566 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Rocket Zena

Read 8 Rocket Zena reviews

1,347 Views
1,347 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Rocket Zena

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

AutoSys Workload Automation and Rocket Zena compete in the workload automation category. AutoSys has an edge in pricing and support satisfaction, whereas Rocket Zena impresses with its comprehensive features justifying its costs.

Features:AutoSys Workload Automation handles complex workflows with strong scheduling capabilities, enhanced with security features and broad system integrations. Its user-friendly interface facilitates easy upgrades and usage. Rocket Zena is noted for its advanced automation and flexible integration options, providing an intuitive diagram-based interface for workflow management which simplifies complex operations. It features robust cross-platform job scheduling and containerized deployment capabilities.

Room for Improvement:AutoSys could benefit from faster integration cycles with new technologies and a more competitive upfront pricing model. Enhancements in predictive analytics and SLA management are areas for growth. Additionally, expanding the platform's user interface design would bolster its market position. Rocket Zena may enhance its licensing flexibility and documentation consistency. Expanding support for real-time operational visibility and facilitating more streamlined system maintenance processes would improve its offering. Moreover, simplifying the learning curve for containerized deployments would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:AutoSys's traditional deployment is complemented by strong support, assisting with complex scheduling and integration processes. It's known for stability and user-friendly updates, fostering ease of use. Rocket Zena, with its modern deployment model, emphasizes seamless integration and provides excellent customer service. It offers a containerized deployment, simplifying updates and configurations while maintaining high user satisfaction in terms of support and operational ease.

Pricing and ROI:AutoSys involves a higher initial setup cost but is seen as delivering justifiable ROI through long-term efficiency. It is cost-effective in reducing manual tasks by automating extensive workflows. Rocket Zena offers relatively lower upfront costs with competitive pricing, attributed to its innovative and feature-rich offerings. Its ability to automate repetitive tasks efficiently enhances user productivity, ensuring a satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,008 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rocket Zena

Ranking in Workload Automation

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 9.9%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rocket Zena is 2.5%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AutoSys Workload Automation	9.9%
Rocket Zena	2.5%
Other	87.6%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

JuanGonzalez6

IT Solutions Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

A continuously evolving, stable solution, with responsive support

The visual whiteboard for design and execution included with the solution is very crucial to those who are new to Rocket Zena, especially so that the learning curve is minimized and they can focus on accomplishing the task. We process our system's payroll through Rocket Zena. The fact that it's a multi-process, multi-layered application, means that we can rely on the solution for kicking off processes, notifying user vendors of the steps, completions, error logging, and historic events from the previous run times. Rocket Zena's ability to automate jobs on the mainframe as a distribution workload automation solution is good. The solution continuously improves over time. We're eager to start the latest upgrade this coming year that'll put us on the cloud. Hopefully, this will improve the product even more. We can run things natively without the scheduler if needed. The solution working properly and up to date without the need for a mainframe scheduler is crucial. We use the solution to manage a few complex operational workflows end-to-end across multiple technology stacks. Rocket Zena does a great job of simplifying our cross-platform processes through automation. The solution helps speed operations up and keeps them automated allowing us to focus on other priorities. The solution helps increase our completion rates by working overnight to meet our SLAs. Rocket Zena completes 30 percent of our workload outside of our standard work hours. Rocket Zena's cross-platform job scheduling helped us save around 40 percent of programming time by automating repetitive tasks. We use the solution to transfer our current files and keep up with our infrastructure on a few automated jobs, such as refreshing our database which happens overnight. The solution helped free up around 15 percent of our engineer's time to focus on more value-added work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."

"It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."

"Automation of patch process."

"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."

"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."

"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"The most valuable feature is the FTP file transfer."

"I have found the scheduling feature the most valuable. I can map dependencies by using ASG-Zena. It gives a nice, quick visualization as to where things are."

"From a Linux configuration point of view, Rocket Zena is straightforward. It's fairly easy to set up the server and agents once you know how to do it."

"Its FTP feature is very good, as is scheduling any process or task with the Zena client. I have found it to be very helpful. If a task fails, it gives you a prompt."

"In the latest upgrade, Zena added a web-based client. The more I use it, the more I like it. It's an excellent interface. They do a good job of steadily improving the solution to make it more useful."

"We haven't had any problems since we installed it. It runs as expected, we haven't had any critical problems. It helps keeps the business running 24/7."

"I like the whole product, but specifically, I like the license part. It's very easy to acquire a license for this product."

"You can click Ctrl-G and bring a diagram view. You're able to view in a diagram format. The view that it provides is easy, and you can move to the left, up, or down. You can double-click on a certain process. It'll drill into that process and all of its underlying components. You can double-click on an arrow or a component, and it'll bring up a screen that'll have all the variables that are assigned to that particular piece, as well as the values at run time. So, the diagram feature of it, at least for me, is pretty valuable."

Cons

"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."

"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."

"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."

"Autosys is still lagging behind some competitive products from a functionality perspective."

"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."

"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."

"Most AutoSys Workload Automation customers are moving because of cost; it is more cost intrusive."

"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"The scheduling mapping is a little disjointed. There is no wizard-type approach. There are a lot of different things that you have to do in completely different areas. They could probably add the functionality for creating all components of a mapping or an OPA schedule. The component creation could be done collectively rather than through individual components."

"The UI is not intuitive, and it would be nice if there was a web interface."

"One area where it could be improved is communication between the different servers. Sometimes there are processes that have already been completed but we get a status notification that they're still active."

"In the web interface, it stacks the tasks across the top, and they accumulate until you close or clean those out. That seems a little cumbersome. You must right-click and close all tabs constantly to keep the console clean and manage your views."

"The documentation has room for improvement."

"Rocket Zena is a mainframe-based job scheduler. I would like it to be more open so that we can use it on a distributed platform."

"Another one that is probably a little bit bigger for me is that when there is an issue or there's an error, it writes on a different screen. I have to find the actual process name and go to a different screen to view the alert that got generated. On that screen, everyone's processes, not just the processes of the folks in my department, are thrown. It takes me a while to find the actual error so that I could go in there and look at the alert. It could be because of the way it was set up, but at least for me, it isn't too intuitive."

"In the next release, I would like the user experience to be improved. The user interface should be more appealing to gen-z."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"The pricing and the licensing are good. It is affordable and can be used to improve and optimize productivity."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

45%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	77

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

It is reasonably priced compared to the market.

See all answers

Do you have any tips for managing my company's modernization, without any disruptions?

Today, we will look at the legacy systems, the red flags that point at the system getting old and rusty, and the ways a reliable custom software. This guide: https://www.cleveroad.com/blog/legacy-s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 30% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Control-M vs Rocket Zena

Compared 46% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Rocket Zena

Compared 17% of the time

Rocket Zeke vs Rocket Zena

Compared 13% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Rocket Zena

Compared 5% of the time

JAMS vs Rocket Zena

Compared 5% of the time

More Rocket Zena Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

October 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Rocket Zena

October 2025

Download Rocket Zena product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

ASG-Zena

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation efficiently manages complex workloads across platforms, offering high availability and seamless platform integration. Its reliability and scalability are valued for enterprise-level automation, enhancing job management and reducing manual effort with robust scheduling and advanced security.

AutoSys Workload Automation is known for its user-friendly capabilities, effectively handling cross-platform job scheduling with mainframe integration. It supports high availability, ensuring reliable performance for critical operations. Despite enhancements needed in its GUI and integration capabilities, AutoSys remains effective for batch processing, file transfers, ETL, and managing dependencies across servers and applications. Improvements are suggested for deployment complexity and monitoring features. More effective licensing and scalability solutions, along with modern subscription models and cloud integration, could address cost and automation barriers.

What are AutoSys Workload Automation's key features?

Robust Scheduling: Automates job scheduling across multiple platforms efficiently.
Advanced Security: Ensures secure management of workloads.
High Availability: Maintains performance during critical operations.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly integrates with diverse systems.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise demands.

What benefits should users expect from AutoSys Workload Automation?

Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual task management.
Enhanced Job Management: Improves oversight and control over job processes.
Flexibility in Scheduling: Offers adaptable scheduling and monitoring options.
Reliability: Consistent job execution without failures.
Security: Protects enterprise-level operations.

In industries like banking, insurance, and retail, AutoSys Workload Automation facilitates 24/7 automated job execution, ensuring smooth task automation. It allows companies to manage enterprise workloads effectively, catering to batch processing, file transfers, and handling job dependencies in a consistent manner.

Broadcom

Rocket Zena offers scheduling and dependency mapping, intuitive interface, and containerized deployment. It simplifies workflow automation, enhancing efficiency across platforms.

Rocket Zena's strengths lie in its scheduling capabilities, graphical interface, and efficient deployment. It supports users in task management with cross-platform scheduling, streamlining repetitive tasks through automation. The web-based client facilitates process visualization and workflow management, while the notification system enhances task handling. Users can manage mainframe, Linux, and Windows environments while integrating with SAP and Oracle, ensuring comprehensive automation and efficient job execution.

What are the key features of Rocket Zena?

Scheduling and Dependency Mapping: Manages tasks efficiently with a graphical interface.
Containerized Deployment: Simplifies deployment and improves efficiency.
FTP Capabilities: Facilitates secure file transfers and backups.
Web-based Client and Whiteboard: Enhances process visualization and control.
Cross-Platform Scheduling: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates complex tasks, freeing time for value-added work.
Improved Accuracy: Minimizes manual errors with reliable automation.
Streamlined Task Management: Simplifies workflow with intuitive notification systems.
Easy Integration: Supports SAP, Oracle, and other enterprise platforms.

In industries like finance and manufacturing, Rocket Zena plays a vital role in scheduling batch jobs and automating file transfers. It helps adapt task scheduling to business calendars and integrate with existing platforms, ensuring a smooth workflow that meets business objectives.

Rocket Software

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Fraternidad Muprespa

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena

September 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Rocket Zena report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.