Auth0 vs CyberArk Identity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Auth0 Logo
9,464 views|6,237 comparisons
CyberArk Logo
989 views|828 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auth0 and CyberArk Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app.""It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy.""The most important thing for me is compliance. Everything that they have developed in Auth0 is already certified by many regulators such as ISO. So, we do not need to take care of that. We have the shared responsibility model to share assets with other products we are using in the cloud.""It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features.""The most valuable feature of the product is scalability.""It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on.""It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process.""The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."

More Auth0 Pros →

"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS.""The setup, via cloud, is simple.""The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory.""The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half.""The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff.""It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening.""The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security.""The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."

More CyberArk Identity Pros →

Cons
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that.""The tool's price should be improved.""This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced.""The product could use a more flexible administration structure""The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly.""The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved.""When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience.""There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."

More Auth0 Cons →

"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area.""More integrations would be better.""CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement.""In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement.""The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity.""The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support.""The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability.""The user interface could be improved."

More CyberArk Identity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."
  • "There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."
  • "Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."
  • "It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."
  • More Auth0 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
  • "There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
  • "I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
  • "The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
  • "There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
  • "In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."
  • "CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
  • "It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
  • More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the product is scalability.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:It is expensive and not friendly to small developers. On the other hand, Clerk is user-friendly for smaller companies. Auth0 could become more easier. B2B organizations need to catch up with the… more »
    Top Answer:I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users.
    Top Answer:It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive. It's like choosing between Volkswagen and… more »
    Top Answer:CyberArk Identity could improve by allowing federation directly or seamlessly, without the need for an Identity Connector. Instead of building separate Azure Connectors, if they could just federate… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    9,464
    Comparisons
    6,237
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    556
    Rating
    8.4
    9th
    Views
    989
    Comparisons
    828
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    480
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Idaptive
    Learn More
    Overview

    Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management solution that securely authenticates and authorizes users on different platforms and applications. It offers seamless integration, easy configuration, and reliable performance for managing identity and access. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and support for multi-factor authentication. 

    With robust documentation and excellent customer service, Auth0 enables developers to efficiently implement authentication and authorization processes. Its valuable features include easy integration, robust security, seamless single sign-on, and customizable authentication options. Auth0 also enhances organizational operations and productivity by streamlining processes, improving collaboration and communication, reducing errors, and facilitating seamless integration with existing systems. 

    CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

    CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

    • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
    • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
    • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

    According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

    IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

    Sample Customers
    1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota
    MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Consumer Goods Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Auth0 vs. CyberArk Identity
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Auth0 is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 13 reviews while CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.4, while CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Provides interface application integration, but Management API needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and ForgeRock, whereas CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate. See our Auth0 vs. CyberArk Identity report.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.