We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"This is a customizable product."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The product helps you to build faster."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our AuraQuantic vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.