Atera vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Atera and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Atera is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.8, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Atera holds a 6.9% mindshare in RMM, compared to TeamViewer’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 16 Atera reviews

5,924 Views
1,836 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

TeamViewer ONE

Read 34 TeamViewer ONE reviews

2,100 Views
1,554 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Atera

TeamViewer ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

Atera and TeamViewer ONE compete in the remote management category. Atera seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effective pricing model, which provides greater value for startups.

Features: Atera includes an integration with Splashtop for reliable remote access, automation capabilities such as a Shared Script Library, and efficient patch management. TeamViewer ONE offers dependable chat and file transfer capabilities, as well as straightforward remote management functionality.

Room for Improvement: Users of Atera suggest enhancing mobile management features, better third-party integration, and improving billing and reporting functionalities. For TeamViewer ONE, users point out the need for better user-friendliness in licensing, improved security protocols, and greater compatibility across different versions and platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Atera and TeamViewer ONE enable deployment via Public Cloud and On-premises. Atera is noted for its ease of use and quick setup, making it ideal for startups. Customer service is a strong suit for both products, though Atera's support is frequently commended for quick response times and an extensive knowledge base.

Pricing and ROI: Atera offers a cost-effective pricing model, charging per technician, allowing unlimited device management which is advantageous for startups. TeamViewer ONE provides a free version but is generally more expensive, especially for larger licenses, with costs based on usage, making its competitors sometimes perceived as offering better value.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

5th

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (11th), Network Monitoring Software (39th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (39th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), AIOps (19th), Agentic Automation (8th)

TeamViewer ONE

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

9th

Ranking in Patch Management

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (22nd), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 6.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 3.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atera	6.9%
TeamViewer ONE	3.4%
Other	89.7%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Ning Chane

IT Manager at Telstra

Remote monitoring has streamlined endpoint management and consistently reduced ticket resolution time

The best features Atera offers include the per-technician pricing, which is honestly one of the biggest things. Unlimited endpoints for a flat monthly fee per tech is a model that makes sense for us, since we are not paying more every time we add a new endpoint. The AI Copilot feature has been a nice addition that helps our techs summarize tickets and suggest fixes faster, which has cut our resolution times noticeably. The AI Copilot feature has specifically helped my team because the automation handles a lot of the routine work, such as patch deployments, maintenance tasks, and monitoring alerts. Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat. The outcomes or metrics showing how Atera has made a positive impact include the 30% reduction in ticket resolution time I mentioned earlier.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"Atera has saved us a lot of time."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

"All corporations that have an IT department should look into and utilize this solution."

"One thing that I'm most impressed by with Atera is how much they listen to their community to focus on more integrations."

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

More Atera pros

"The pricing of the solution is very reasonable."

"The solution is easy to set up."

"It's considered a trusted application."

"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."

"Almost all the features are valuable to me, like the scalable feature and its highly interactive software."

"I like the possibility of using this software across different operating systems and clouds, such as AWS or Azure Cloud, while being able to efficiently transfer files and run the data."

"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Remote Access."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"Reporting is probably the main frustration."

"There is definitely room for improvement with its automation capabilities."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one."

"Customization could be improved."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"It should improve its processes."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

More Atera cons

"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."

"The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."

"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because every application gets bugs. So, there are some instances where it might be buggy and hanging."

"VPN connection is an area with shortcomings that need improvement in the solution."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."

"If you have one version, like if you have version 14, and the client has version 15, you can't access his computer. If the client is on 14 and the technician is on 15, he can't access the end user who's at home. So there's a disparity in versioning."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee."

"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."

"The solution's license is expensive."

"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"It is a licensed product."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

Reporting is probably the main frustration. Some of the more advanced reports are locked behind higher pricing tiers, which feels restrictive. Atera can be improved in that the remote access can al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

My main use case for Atera is remote monitoring and management across all our endpoints. We have devices spread across multiple sites, so having one platform where we can see everything, push patch...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 9% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Sendbird vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Atera

Compared 3% of the time

More Atera Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 16% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Vortex vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

June 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

May 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.

Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.

What are Atera's key features?

Automation: Streamlines processes with powerful automation capabilities.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy access to client machines for issue resolution.
Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design enhances efficiency.
Integration: Seamless TeamViewer and Splashtop integration.
Monitoring: Effective monitoring and alert systems preempt issues.
Ticketing System: Boosts productivity with efficient workflow management.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are always up-to-date.
Scripting: Powerful tools for automation and task execution.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Efficiency: Automation and scripting enhance task management.
Cost-effective: Combines robust features with competitive pricing.
Scalability: Cross-platform compatibility supports business growth.
Productivity: Monitoring and alerts optimize resource allocation.

Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Atera

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Free Report: Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors and best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.