No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
Ataccama ONE streamlined MetLife operations, reducing completion time and costs, but benefits varied based on operational focus.
Sentiment score
3.6
Ping Identity Platform simplifies identity management, lowers IT overhead, enhances security, improves efficiency, boosts satisfaction, and offers scalability.
Legally, financially, and reputationally, addressing these data quality issues was crucial, and implementing Ataccama was a major step for them.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
Money got saved and time got saved because previously, data quality was addressed through SQL and Python.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Ataccama ONE's customer service is highly responsive and effective, though some users desire more affordable and varied support options.
Sentiment score
6.1
Ping Identity Platform's support is praised for rapid P1 responses but critiqued for slow non-critical responses and portal confusion.
MetLife worked with senior developers who made a positive impact on our experience.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
We can raise a ticket using Jira, and they address it as soon as possible based on priority.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
If it is a small issue, they tend to respond very quickly and they try to answer the question.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
I would rate the technical support for Ping Identity Platform seven out of ten because of their limited support and late availability.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.4
Ataccama ONE Platform is scalable for large datasets but needs optimization for cloud scalability and batch processing.
Sentiment score
7.3
Ping Identity Platform excels in scalability, efficiently managing large user bases and high traffic with minimal disruptions.
As the volume increases, the performance of Ataccama ONE Platform decreases.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Ataccama ONE Platform's scalability is high, supporting large volumes of data and complex logic with flexible deployment options.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
There was a concern with the architectural team about how much processing Ataccama ONE would need as usage scaled up.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Ataccama ONE Platform is stable but faces occasional issues, especially during updates, with overall user satisfaction reported high.
Sentiment score
7.9
Ping Identity Platform is reliable with minimal downtime; users value its stability despite occasional integration and security update challenges.
With Ataccama ONE Platform, it becomes very helpful, and I can directly integrate multiple sources on one platform to maintain data quality and check for it efficiently.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The updates were worth implementing, with no significant problems observed.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
We are still developing the application, so there have not been many crashes or instabilities.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
Founder at APSSIAM
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
Iam Consultant at itcinfotech
 

Room For Improvement

Users suggest improving large dataset handling, integration capabilities, search optimization, documentation, interface with tools, and user experience.
Ping Identity Platform struggles with complexity, costs, limited legacy integration, and requires UI, troubleshooting, and integration improvements.
The documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
It would be beneficial if these interactions could be more plug-and-play and less code-intensive, making them more efficient and easier to set up.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
After every change and every match and merge rule you apply, you need to reprocess the entire record, which has to again go through the match and merge rules.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Setup Cost

Ataccama ONE Platform's pricing is diverse, with setup costs potentially costly, while lacking a support contract might save money.
Ping Identity Platform offers cost-effective pricing appealing to large enterprises, with pricing starting at $20,000 annually.
What made the costing a problem with Ataccama ONE Platform is related to licensing, as it is every one year.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The only concern I had was that some features like address validation cost a little extra with the basic plan.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
I have heard that the licensing and setup costs are quite high, especially if we try to connect for a support call.
Data Analyst, Quality Assurance Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
 

Valuable Features

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data quality and efficiency through automation, integration, and user-friendly tools across diverse environments.
Ping Identity Platform offers robust features like MFA, RBAC, and API security, boasting ease of use and extensive integration.
We were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
It is very good in scalability.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted our organization because before its implementation, completing tasks such as more than 100 or thousands of rules took more than a week. Now, we complete those tasks in less than two or three days due to the automation and one-time task capability.
Data Analyst, Quality Assurance Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
Founder at APSSIAM
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (3rd), Data Scrubbing Software (3rd), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th), AI Observability (22nd)
Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (9th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (9th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 1.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ataccama ONE Platform1.8%
Ping Identity Platform0.9%
Other97.3%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Akhil Danturti - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
Streamlines reusable data quality rules and has highlighted the need for richer logic and documentation
I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was not that great around 2020 when I started working with it. There can still be more features including writing any logic, improving more keywords for logic building, and enhancing address validation, based on my understanding. User experience is actually good; I do not have any complaints or feedback on that. However, the documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool. If anything is needed for understanding, you have to rely on documentation. Ataccama's documentation has potential for improvement.
AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited
Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys
Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
For improvement, I feel there is a size issue. Whenever we create a monitoring project with a large amount of data, such as multiple catalogs, it starts failing. If that size issue can be fixed, At...
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
My main use case for Ataccama ONE Platform is to create data quality rules and perform profiling of my data, majorly focused on data quality. A specific example of how I used Ataccama ONE Platform ...
What advice do you have for others considering Ataccama ONE Platform?
Ataccama ONE Platform was on-premise before but has moved to a hybrid cloud now. Ataccama ONE Platform integrates with other tools or systems in my organization. Ataccama ONE Platform connects with...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with PingAccess?
The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...
What is your primary use case for PingAccess?
The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...
 

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.