

Ping Identity Platform and Ataccama ONE Platform compete in the enterprise technology space, focusing on security and data management, respectively. Based on data comparisons, Ping Identity Platform is favored for its robust security features, while Ataccama ONE Platform excels in data management, making it advantageous for organizations prioritizing data governance.
Features: Ping Identity Platform is known for identity and access management features, including multi-factor authentication and single sign-on capabilities. Ataccama ONE Platform offers strong features in data quality, master data management, and data governance. Additionally, Ataccama efficiently handles large-scale data management and provides flexible data processing capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform can enhance its data management functionalities and streamline certain deployment processes. It could also expand its customization options for different organizational requirements. Ataccama ONE Platform may improve its security features and enhance interoperability with third-party security solutions. Additionally, there is room for improvement in user interface intuitiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform offers flexible deployment options, both cloud-based and on-premises, with strong integration and customer support. Ataccama ONE Platform offers a predominantly cloud-based deployment with straightforward setup processes. Ataccama's strength lies in its ease of deployment for data-centric organizations, coupled with a focus on straightforward customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform incurs moderate initial setup costs but offers strong long-term ROI due to its security advantages. Ataccama ONE Platform may have a higher implementation cost but provides substantial ROI through enhanced data management efficiencies. Ataccama's value proposition is compelling for those prioritizing data management over initial costs.
Legally, financially, and reputationally, addressing these data quality issues was crucial, and implementing Ataccama was a major step for them.
Money got saved and time got saved because previously, data quality was addressed through SQL and Python.
MetLife worked with senior developers who made a positive impact on our experience.
We can raise a ticket using Jira, and they address it as soon as possible based on priority.
If it is a small issue, they tend to respond very quickly and they try to answer the question.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
The problem with the support team is that I do not like support; the day of the threat image, they never come on the call and unless it is a priority, they never come to call to defend it and to provide any kind of solutions.
I would rate the technical support for Ping Identity Platform seven out of ten because of their limited support and late availability.
As the volume increases, the performance of Ataccama ONE Platform decreases.
Ataccama ONE Platform's scalability is high, supporting large volumes of data and complex logic with flexible deployment options.
There was a concern with the architectural team about how much processing Ataccama ONE would need as usage scaled up.
With Ataccama ONE Platform, it becomes very helpful, and I can directly integrate multiple sources on one platform to maintain data quality and check for it efficiently.
The updates were worth implementing, with no significant problems observed.
We are still developing the application, so there have not been many crashes or instabilities.
Ping Identity Platform demonstrates strong stability, as it is not prone to bugs.
In terms of stability for Ping Identity Platform, we haven't faced any issues till now.
Overall, I see PingFederate as a stable product.
The documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool.
It would be beneficial if these interactions could be more plug-and-play and less code-intensive, making them more efficient and easier to set up.
After every change and every match and merge rule you apply, you need to reprocess the entire record, which has to again go through the match and merge rules.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems.
What made the costing a problem with Ataccama ONE Platform is related to licensing, as it is every one year.
The only concern I had was that some features like address validation cost a little extra with the basic plan.
I have heard that the licensing and setup costs are quite high, especially if we try to connect for a support call.
Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.
We were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
It is very good in scalability.
Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted our organization because before its implementation, completing tasks such as more than 100 or thousands of rules took more than a week. Now, we complete those tasks in less than two or three days due to the automation and one-time task capability.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Ping Identity Platform can be accessed both on-premises and in the cloud, allowing for high flexibility in creating user flows and policies tailored to client requirements.
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Ataccama ONE Platform | 1.8% |
| Ping Identity Platform | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.
Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.
What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.
Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.
This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.
What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.