

Ping Identity Platform and Ataccama ONE Platform compete in identity management and data management. Based on data comparisons, Ataccama ONE Platform has an upper hand in features, while Ping Identity Platform is stronger in pricing and support satisfaction.
Features: Ping Identity Platform offers features like single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access control. Ataccama ONE Platform includes data cataloging, data cleansing, and AI-enhanced data governance.
Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could improve in integrating advanced AI analytics, expanding data governance functionalities, and enhancing UI customization options. Ataccama ONE Platform can work on simplifying its deployment process, providing cost-effective solutions, and expanding identity management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform is noted for easy setup and responsive customer service, appealing to businesses needing quick deployment. Ataccama ONE Platform presents a more complex deployment but is supported by a robust service team for effective resolution of challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform is generally cost-effective, appealing to organizations focused on ROI. Ataccama ONE Platform may entail a higher initial investment, justified by its comprehensive features for companies valuing data management.
Legally, financially, and reputationally, addressing these data quality issues was crucial, and implementing Ataccama was a major step for them.
Money got saved and time got saved because previously, data quality was addressed through SQL and Python.
MetLife worked with senior developers who made a positive impact on our experience.
We can raise a ticket using Jira, and they address it as soon as possible based on priority.
If it is a small issue, they tend to respond very quickly and they try to answer the question.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
As the volume increases, the performance of Ataccama ONE Platform decreases.
Ataccama ONE Platform's scalability is high, supporting large volumes of data and complex logic with flexible deployment options.
There was a concern with the architectural team about how much processing Ataccama ONE would need as usage scaled up.
The updates were worth implementing, with no significant problems observed.
We are still developing the application, so there have not been many crashes or instabilities.
Ataccama ONE Platform is stable.
The documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool.
It would be beneficial if these interactions could be more plug-and-play and less code-intensive, making them more efficient and easier to set up.
After every change and every match and merge rule you apply, you need to reprocess the entire record, which has to again go through the match and merge rules.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
What made the costing a problem with Ataccama ONE Platform is related to licensing, as it is every one year.
The only concern I had was that some features like address validation cost a little extra with the basic plan.
I have heard that the licensing and setup costs are quite high, especially if we try to connect for a support call.
We were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
It is very good in scalability.
Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted our organization because before its implementation, completing tasks such as more than 100 or thousands of rules took more than a week. Now, we complete those tasks in less than two or three days due to the automation and one-time task capability.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Ping Identity Platform | 0.6% |
| Ataccama ONE Platform | 2.3% |
| Other | 97.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.
Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.
What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.