Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Ataccama ONE reduced costs by enhancing data quality, speeding tasks, and minimizing teams, though not all users saw returns.
Sentiment score
5.3
Ping Identity Platform simplifies identity management, lowers IT overhead, enhances security, improves efficiency, boosts satisfaction, and offers scalability.
Legally, financially, and reputationally, addressing these data quality issues was crucial, and implementing Ataccama was a major step for them.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
Money got saved and time got saved because previously, data quality was addressed through SQL and Python.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Ataccama ONE Platform's customer service is praised for effectiveness, but concerns include prolonged issue resolution and cost-related chat support suggestions.
Sentiment score
6.3
Ping Identity Platform offers responsive, knowledgeable support with some portal confusion; ratings typically range from six to eight.
MetLife worked with senior developers who made a positive impact on our experience.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
We can raise a ticket using Jira, and they address it as soon as possible based on priority.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
If it is a small issue, they tend to respond very quickly and they try to answer the question.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.3
Ataccama ONE is scalable, praised for data flexibility, but may face performance issues with large datasets in cloud environments.
Sentiment score
7.2
Ping Identity Platform efficiently scales for diverse users, featuring adaptable environments, clustering, and load balancing for seamless performance.
As the volume increases, the performance of Ataccama ONE Platform decreases.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Ataccama ONE Platform's scalability is high, supporting large volumes of data and complex logic with flexible deployment options.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
There was a concern with the architectural team about how much processing Ataccama ONE would need as usage scaled up.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Ataccama ONE is stable and reliable, with minor issues mostly during upgrades; users rate it 70-80% stable.
Sentiment score
7.8
Ping Identity Platform is stable, generally rated 8-10/10, with minor issues in integrations and external dependencies.
The updates were worth implementing, with no significant problems observed.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
We are still developing the application, so there have not been many crashes or instabilities.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Ataccama ONE Platform is stable.
master data analyst operation at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Ataccama ONE Platform faces performance, integration, documentation, and usability challenges needing improvements for better data handling and governance.
Ping Identity Platform needs improvements in biometrics, integration, cloud capabilities, user interface, and documentation for better security and flexibility.
The documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
It would be beneficial if these interactions could be more plug-and-play and less code-intensive, making them more efficient and easier to set up.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
After every change and every match and merge rule you apply, you need to reprocess the entire record, which has to again go through the match and merge rules.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
 

Setup Cost

Ataccama ONE Platform pricing is reasonable, with additional fees for features, impacting organizations with specific data security needs.
Ping Identity Platform offers competitive, subscription-based pricing, ideal for large enterprises but less suitable for smaller companies.
What made the costing a problem with Ataccama ONE Platform is related to licensing, as it is every one year.
data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The only concern I had was that some features like address validation cost a little extra with the basic plan.
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
I have heard that the licensing and setup costs are quite high, especially if we try to connect for a support call.
Data Analyst, Quality Assurance Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Ataccama ONE Platform excels in user-friendly data management, offering automation, scalability, and AI features for enhanced governance.
Ping Identity Platform offers customizable authentication, robust security features, and seamless integration for diverse client needs and device management.
We were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge
It is very good in scalability.
Data Engineer lV at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Ataccama ONE Platform has positively impacted our organization because before its implementation, completing tasks such as more than 100 or thousands of rules took more than a week. Now, we complete those tasks in less than two or three days due to the automation and one-time task capability.
Data Analyst, Quality Assurance Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
It's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well.
VP Engineering at Inspirit Vision
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (4th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th), AI Observability (39th)
Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform0.6%
Ataccama ONE Platform2.3%
Other97.1%
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

Akhil Danturti - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance Analyst at Entain India
Streamlines reusable data quality rules and has highlighted the need for richer logic and documentation
I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was not that great around 2020 when I started working with it. There can still be more features including writing any logic, improving more keywords for logic building, and enhancing address validation, based on my understanding. User experience is actually good; I do not have any complaints or feedback on that. However, the documentation part can be improved because documentation is key for any organization or tool. If anything is needed for understanding, you have to rely on documentation. Ataccama's documentation has potential for improvement.
SV
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies
I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
I worked in Ataccama ONE Platform from version 5 and now we have version 15, which has improved a lot. However, there is still considerable scope for improvement because Ataccama ONE Platform was n...
What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?
My main use case for Ataccama ONE Platform is to develop data quality rules, apply them in the monitoring project, and then triage the issues with the data quality rules. For example, we had a proj...
What advice do you have for others considering Ataccama ONE Platform?
Ataccama ONE Platform was on-premise before but has moved to a hybrid cloud now. Ataccama ONE Platform integrates with other tools or systems in my organization. Ataccama ONE Platform connects with...
What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
 

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.