Ataccama ONE Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Ataccama and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ataccama is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Ataccama holds a 2.3% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 21.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,615 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 58 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

17,846 Views
14,812 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Purview Data Governance compete in the data management and governance domain. Microsoft Purview appears to have an upper hand with its extensive feature set, offering robust data governance capabilities.

Features: Ataccama ONE Platform provides advanced data quality management, flexible integration capabilities, and real-time data processing. Microsoft Purview focuses on comprehensive data cataloging, information protection, and end-to-end visibility for compliance, making it particularly strong in data governance.

Room for Improvement: Ataccama ONE could improve in cost-effectiveness and ease of use for non-expert users. Its real-time data processing can be enhanced for large-scale operations. There is also room for greater integration with cloud-based solutions. Microsoft Purview can bolster its automation features for more seamless metadata management and improve its capabilities in working with non-Microsoft platforms. Additionally, enhancing the user interface could make navigation more intuitive. The documentation can also be more detailed, especially for deployment scenarios that require customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ataccama ONE offers a modular architecture allowing seamless deployment, supported by proactive customer service. Microsoft Purview utilizes Azure's cloud infrastructure, simplifying deployment with extensive documentation and reliable support. Its cloud-first approach facilitates rapid implementation, whereas Ataccama ONE requires careful configuration for its modular system.

Pricing and ROI: Ataccama ONE involves a significant initial investment but promises a strong ROI through process optimizations. Microsoft Purview offers a more cost-effective entry with scalable pricing based on usage, making it attractive for businesses of various sizes. While Ataccama ONE presents a higher upfront cost, Microsoft Purview's scalable pricing model and extensive features enhance its reputation for cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (2nd), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th)

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 21.6%, down from 23.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Governance	21.6%
Ataccama ONE Platform	2.3%
Other	76.1%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

AmrNaeem

Manager, Service Delivery & Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It helps us by reporting on and auditing leaks and breaches

One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek. Microsoft Purview offers data protection across a multi-cloud and multi-platform environment. It's critical that Purview connects to iOS, Mac, and Android. We could only secure some of our data if it only covered Windows. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time. It's very easy to use. Purview's compliance features are crucial. We have to match some cases in other countries to our own to comply with the policies, procedures, and regulatory frameworks here.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"It is also easy to deploy."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The best part is that I can create classifications per my requirements. I use it to classify multiple platforms like AWS, GCP, Azure, and different file sharing systems."

"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."

"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens."

"Microsoft Purview is scalable."

"Has a good interface and is reasonably priced."

"It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies."

"The features of Microsoft Purview Data Governance that I value most include communication compliance. It provides visibility into how people are using Copilot for Microsoft and gives insight into risks and sensitive conversations."

"The data lineage feature stands out. It tracks where the data comes from and any changes made."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"Data movement is a pain."

"Reflecting organizational changes within Purview is impractical."

"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."

"As Microsoft Purview got a little more mature, the deployments got a little more complex, as we were kind of seeing that there are a lot of ways, like there were a hundred ways to do one thing or less."

"In terms of the competence of the tools with the Microsoft ecosystem, the product can do better."

"One of the challenges is that Microsoft changes things so quickly that sometimes you're just playing catch-up, and sometimes these changes aren't communicated effectively."

"Running eDiscovery once a day takes quite a long time because it has to fetch your data. I also want the eDiscovery results to be improved. At the same time, I would like to get a centralized page where I could see records management applied to my Office 365 tenant visualized instead of waiting for a custom script to run through the complete tenant."

"One area for improvement is better documentation on what is working and what is not, as well as what features are allowed depending on your licensing model. It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses."

"I have some concerns about the separation of roles in Purview from the Microsoft tenant, as well as how they interact with the security portal and endpoint manager."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"Purview's price is pretty high when you factor in storage costs."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"The price is reasonable because most of our clients already have an E3 license, which makes implementation easy."

"The price is reasonable considering its value."

"While Purview's standard pricing might not be accessible to most small businesses, we were fortunate to benefit from the educational pricing which made it a financially viable option for our needs."

"Licensing is frustrating due to multiple modules and licenses. The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion."

"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."

"Microsoft Purview requires a Microsoft 365 license and is included with an E5 license."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

There should be more clarity about the costing, particularly how the cost is calculated, especially when utilizing health reports and quality features. Additionally, adding more tools around data q...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Lineage vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

September 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

August 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

July 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.