OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.5, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

778 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 260 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

15,142 Views
11,357 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Splunk AppDynamics compete in business process monitoring and application performance management. While OpenText is advantageous in pricing and support, Splunk AppDynamics offers a broader range of features, making it a compelling choice for those needing extensive functionalities despite the cost.

Features: OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers end-to-end visibility, anomaly detection, and proactive alerts to optimize business processes. On the other hand, Splunk AppDynamics offers deep-dive analytics, real-time performance metrics, and comprehensive application monitoring, seamlessly correlating app behavior across multiple levels.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its scalability and ease of integration with newer technologies. Increasing analysis speed and refining user interface options might also benefit OpenText users. Splunk AppDynamics, while feature-rich, may benefit from more intuitive configuration settings and streamlined initial deployment procedures, and it could manage costs more effectively by providing flexible licensing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is praised for straightforward deployment and effective customer support, facilitating easy integration with existing systems. Splunk AppDynamics presents comprehensive deployment options with extensive integration capabilities but often requires an extended setup period. Its responsive customer service is an asset in navigating complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers competitive pricing, attractive for projects sensitive to costs, complemented by a solid ROI. Splunk AppDynamics, though more expensive, delivers a high ROI through its advanced features, justifying the higher setup costs for enterprises requiring wide-ranging functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

260

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 3.7%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	3.7%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.5%
Other	95.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

DevendraKumar1

Technology lead at Infosys

Has enabled us to detect issues instantly through alerts and monitor every service from a single dashboard

Splunk requires significantly more improvements compared to Splunk AppDynamics, specifically regarding the licensing aspect. Splunk renews licenses every six months, which is inconvenient. It would be better to have a one-year license to avoid needing to update keys constantly, which can only occur on weekends, making it a burdensome task. Although Splunk is better for certain use cases, Splunk AppDynamics is broader in functionality. Specifically, I want enhancements related to creating dashboards not only for logs or minor services but also for configuration levels, allowing us to check configurations immediately without manually opening the entire code when exceptions arise—a feature I wish to see improved in Splunk, although it may not be necessary for Splunk AppDynamics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I don't see any problems in the solution...The solution's technical support was good."

"The best feature of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is that it lets you find errors in synthetic jobs ahead of the users. The solution shows you all front-end metrics. You can also see JavaScript errors and jQuery errors through AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring. You can also do a correlation between the front end and the backend, or from the user to the navigator, to the backend through the solution."

"It's made it easier to collaborate across teams; be able to have the same data immediately in front of you just by sharing a URL."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the response time from the end-to-end server."

"The features of Splunk AppDynamics that I prefer most are the monitoring aspect, making sure we can drill down and find problems."

"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."

"The initial setup is simple."

"I have seen a return on investment with Splunk AppDynamics, as we are investing more and more for Splunk AppDynamics because we have many tools and many applications in our organization."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"The solution has performance issues after we deploy the agent."

"I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications."

"When it comes to the front end with my Node.js and React.js applications, it doesn't capture much of the details."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The solution is available at an inflated cost"

"The main concern is the extensions and their documentation, particularly for the installation of Azure app services. It is lacking some documentation, which is why we are always with the AppDynamics team for support to get the details."

"The AppDynamics installation process needs to be more straightforward. Deploying the product is also tricky."

"AppDynamics should improve its ability to track all the transactions."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"The product is a bit expensive compared to other tools."

"As compared to other applications, its price is moderate. Its price is neither very high nor very low."

"It is not a cheap tool, but you also save in manpower to setup because it is easy and fast. At the end of the day, I think the revenue is much better. BUT, they have an awful co-term mode of licensing."

"Yearly payments have to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution. The solution has no additional costs apart from the licensing costs."

"AppDynamics is priced on the higher side."

"Our purchasing experience through the AWS Marketplace has been pretty painless."

"The solution is highly expensive"

"This price of this product is expensive."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	195

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is highly expensive. Our company pays for the solution on a yearly basis, if we don't add new modules or features to the license, we need ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 23% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 18% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

January 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.