Apica vs NetWitness Platform comparison

Apica and NetWitness are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while NetWitness is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to NetWitness’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,060 Views
435 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

NetWitness Platform

Read 37 NetWitness Platform reviews

1,469 Views
690 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Apica

NetWitness Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetWitness Platform and Apica operate within distinct areas of enterprise technology, one in threat detection and response, the other in performance monitoring and testing. NetWitness is favored for its holistic threat detection capabilities, whereas Apica is recognized for its robust performance monitoring, based on user feedback regarding strengths in their respective domains.

Features: NetWitness offers comprehensive threat detection, seamless security operations integration, and extensive monitoring features. Apica provides in-depth performance testing tools, detailed application performance analytics, and comprehensive load testing features, appealing to users seeking robust monitoring solutions.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness users suggest enhancing integration with third-party tools, improving user interface intuitiveness, and reducing the complexity of feature customization. Apica users recommend simplifying the configuration process, enhancing documentation clarity, and improving the initial setup experience to facilitate a smoother onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness users report straightforward deployment processes but have varying experiences with customer service, indicating room for improvement in support consistency. Apica users mention a challenging initial deployment learning curve but consistently praise the quality and responsiveness of their customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness users are satisfied with its cost-to-value ratio, particularly in terms of security assurance. Apica's competitive pricing is well-received, although some users feel initial setup expenses impact ROI. Both products present compelling value propositions in their areas, balancing cost against performance for their specific focus.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. NetWitness Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. NetWitness Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

NetWitness Platform

Ranking in Log Management

35th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

MOTASHIM Al Razi

CISO at One Bank Limited

It is a stable solution, but they should make the user interface easier to understand

The solution's initial setup takes work. We have to organize multiple paths and many features. The deployment process takes less than a week. But it takes a month to complete if we want to make the solution smarter by integrating it with various devices. I rate the process as a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"From our standpoint, there are a number of valuable features. The WebHooks are obviously really great. The alert framework is really good and then the reporting and visualizations that you get from the dashboards is good. Those three areas are primarily what my team's focused on in terms of usage from day to day."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

More Apica pros

"The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult."

"Incident management is its most valuable feature."

"Offers a good wireless feature."

"The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use."

"In my opinion, the solution's most valuable feature is its capacity to monitor network traffic, logs from devices within the network, and network captures. This capability extends beyond logs to include full network capturing."

"Possibility to investigate incidents based on logs and raw packets, such as extracting files sent over the network"

"The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."

"The most valuable feature is the security that it provides."

More NetWitness Platform pros

Cons

"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

More Apica cons

"Security needs improvement."

"The initial setup was complex because it takes a lot of time to complete the implementation."

"I believe that integrating the solution with other products such as Oracle would be beneficial."

"There are instances where you try to run the reports and then it does not give you the desired outcome."

"Its technical support could be better."

"If we have the ability to run a dynamic analysis through malware in the same suite, it would be great to have a sandbox solution to analyze malware through dynamic analysis."

"The user interface is a little bit difficult for new users and it needs to be improved."

"The multi-tenant capabilities are lagging compared to IBM QRadar."

More NetWitness Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap."

"There is a licensing fee and the customer can choose whether he wishes this to be subscription-based or perpetual."

"In comparison to other SIEM solutions such as Splunk, NetWitness is less costly."

"RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets do not have a subscription model, it's a one-time purchase. There is only a perpetual license."

"The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."

"Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"We have yearly licensing costs. The license fee can be based on the volume of EPS. Some organizations may have, as a gentlemanly gesture, 10,000 EPS and get a 3,000 EPS license but actually use 5,000 EPS."

More NetWitness Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Media Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetWitness Platform?

The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetWitness Platform?

The pricing is comparable to others, and I consider the cost to be intermediate. Specific cost details are unknown to me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetWitness Platform?

There is currently no need for improvement in the SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ), though there could be potential enhancements by integrating with AI.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 27% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 19% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 11% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Elastic Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 12% of the time

RSA enVision vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 9% of the time

More NetWitness Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

August 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform

August 2025

Download NetWitness Platform product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

RSA Security Analytics

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Los Angeles World Airports, Reply

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. NetWitness Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. NetWitness Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. NetWitness Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. NetWitness Platform report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.