Apica vs LogLogic comparison

Apica and TIBCO are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while TIBCO is ranked #59. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to TIBCO’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

398 Views
42 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

LogLogic

Read 2 LogLogic reviews

269 Views
70 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Apica

LogLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LogLogic and Apica compete in user satisfaction and functionality. Apica often has the upper hand due to its advanced features that justify its pricing.

Features: LogLogic offers comprehensive data analysis, robust compliance reporting, and user-friendly interfaces. Apica provides advanced performance monitoring, real-time alerting, and in-depth testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: LogLogic needs better integration flexibility, enhanced dashboard customization, and faster processing speed. Apica requires improved offline support, broader third-party tool compatibility, and simpler user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogLogic has a straightforward setup and responsive customer support. Apica requires more complex deployment, though it offers detailed documentation. Both have commendable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: LogLogic is cost-effective with a satisfactory ROI reported by users. Apica's higher pricing is often justified by its extensive features and long-term benefits. Despite the higher costs, Apica provides significant technology advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. LogLogic Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. LogLogic

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

LogLogic

Ranking in Log Management

59th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (59th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogLogic is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

it_user126030

Senior ICT Solutions Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've evaluated Splunk and IBM Q1 but LogLogic is the best choice for log management. SIEM functionality needs improvement.

If you are searching for log management solution, LogLogic is probably the best choice. The SIEM functionality is not at that level, and I suggest instead to choose another SIEM solution (eg: IBM Q1). In my experience, a good practice is to separate log management from SIEM in a way that they are two separate systems.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs LogLogic

Compared 36% of the time

Logpoint vs LogLogic

Compared 36% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs LogLogic

Compared 28% of the time

More LogLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

May 2025

Download LogLogic product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Log data isn't just for security anymore. Log and machine data is being harnessed to provide insight into IT operational efficiencies Ð and TIBCO LogLogic uses log and machine data as the fuel for improving Operational Intelligence.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Astrium, Cerner, Children's Hospital, Effiage, Lavego, Plantronics, Skipton Building Society, The Body Shop, The Lowry, University of Manitoba

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. LogLogic

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. LogLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. LogLogic and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. LogLogic report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.