Apica vs Falcon LogScale comparison

Apica and CrowdStrike are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while CrowdStrike is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to CrowdStrike’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CrowdStrike users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

398 Views
42 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Falcon LogScale

Read 3 Falcon LogScale reviews

1,085 Views
416 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

Falcon LogScale

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and Falcon LogScale compete in performance monitoring. Apica has an advantage in user satisfaction due to pricing and support, while Falcon LogScale leads in feature set and analytics.

Features: Apica provides efficient monitoring and alerting, strong user satisfaction, and competitive pricing. Falcon LogScale offers advanced analytics, a comprehensive feature set, and robust support.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs better scalability, enhanced integration options, and more core functionality. Falcon LogScale requires improved reporting, easier customization, and more user-experience enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica offers straightforward deployment with responsive customer service. Falcon LogScale involves a complex setup but benefits from knowledgeable support.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is cost-effective with a quick ROI. Falcon LogScale entails a higher initial cost with expected long-term returns due to its feature suite.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Falcon LogScale Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Falcon LogScale

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Falcon LogScale

Ranking in Log Management

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Shaik Shaheer

Security | SIEM Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management

It allows us to efficiently manage and store our data. Its compression and archiving features not only reduce storage costs but also minimize the infrastructure resources needed for data backup. Since we have multiple security solutions in place, it allows us to streamline data handling. We can selectively send security-related events to the SIEM while directing other non-security events from various tools to Falcon LogScale. This flexibility ensures that we have access to all the data we need when required, and we can easily export this data from it as necessary, optimizing our data management and making it readily available for analysis or other purposes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically."

"It is easy to set up and configure."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

More Apica pros

"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."

"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."

"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."

Cons

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."

"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

More Apica cons

"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."

"The integration could improve."

"The price could be lower."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Falcon LogScale?

It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?

The integration could improve. Easy parser writing should be an option to ingest log in a human-readable format for unsupported devices. For visibility perspective, the dashboard should be more use...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?

Initially, the log was for log management. We store our logs for achieving compliance and log retention for longer periods. This function, LogScale, is now a platform where we can do correlation as...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 34% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 22% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 10% of the time

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 7% of the time

More Falcon LogScale Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

May 2025

Download Falcon LogScale product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Falcon LogScale

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Falcon LogScale

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Falcon LogScale and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Falcon LogScale report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.