Apica vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Apica and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.0. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

666 Views
257 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

95 Views
14 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Apica

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Apica and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are both prominent tools in the application performance management sector. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management often scores higher in terms of features and overall value, making it worth the investment for many users despite the higher price.

Features: Apica offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time data visualization, and user-friendly design. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides robust analytics, enterprise integration, and automated diagnostics with more advanced features suited for extensive enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs enhancements in its alerting system, better integration options, and more advanced features. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management could improve its complexity, user-friendliness, and ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, although more complex, offers extensive support and documentation to aid in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Apica generally offers more affordable setup costs, leading to quicker returns on investment. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has higher initial costs but provides greater long-term value through its advanced features and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

51st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."

More Apica pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

Cons

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."

More Apica cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 15% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.