Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apica vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management comparison

Apica and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Broadcom’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Apica
Read 11 Apica reviews
  • 1,060 Views
  • 668 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews
  • 117 Views
  • 117 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Apica and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are both prominent tools in the application performance management sector. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management often scores higher in terms of features and overall value, making it worth the investment for many users despite the higher price.

Features: Apica offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, real-time data visualization, and user-friendly design. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides robust analytics, enterprise integration, and automated diagnostics with more advanced features suited for extensive enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs enhancements in its alerting system, better integration options, and more advanced features. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management could improve its complexity, user-friendliness, and ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, although more complex, offers extensive support and documentation to aid in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Apica generally offers more affordable setup costs, leading to quicker returns on investment. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has higher initial costs but provides greater long-term value through its advanced features and capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apica
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)
Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Punith H K - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features
It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.
Read full review
Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."
"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."
"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."
"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."
"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."
"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."
"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."
"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."
More Apica pros
"The technical support and documentation are quite good."
"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."
 

Cons

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."
"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."
"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."
"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."
"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."
"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."
"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."
"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."
More Apica cons
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
"They lack support and presence in Egypt."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."
"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."
"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."
"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."
"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."
"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."
More Apica pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Media Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Retailer
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?
The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?
I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?
Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica Logo
Dynatrace vs Apica
Compared 27% of the time
Cribl vs Apica Logo
Cribl vs Apica
Compared 19% of the time
AlertSite vs Apica Logo
AlertSite vs Apica
Compared 12% of the time
Datadog vs Apica Logo
Datadog vs Apica
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica
Compared 11% of the time
More Apica Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apica
August 2025
Apica reportDownload Apica product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
August 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
 

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?
  • Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
  • Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
  • Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
  • Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
  • Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally
Which benefits should users expect from Apica?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
  • Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
  • Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
  • Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
  • Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo
NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
July 2025
Free Report: Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apica vs. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.