We performed a comparison between Apache HBase and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
Apache HBase is ranked 10th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Apache HBase is rated 4.0, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache HBase writes "The solution has many performance issues, though it helps manage consumer data sets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Apache HBase is most compared with Accumulo, ScyllaDB, MongoDB, Cassandra and Aerospike Database 7, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Accumulo, SingleStore and ScyllaDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
