We performed a comparison between Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases."Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The installation is difficult."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The licensing model is bad."
Apache HBase is ranked 10th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Apache HBase is rated 4.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache HBase writes "The solution has many performance issues, though it helps manage consumer data sets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Apache HBase is most compared with Accumulo, ScyllaDB, MongoDB, Cassandra and Aerospike Database, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and Couchbase.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.