Apache HBase vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced comparison

Apache and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Apache is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Apache holds a 5.1% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 15.9% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Apache HBase

Read 4 Apache HBase reviews

894 Views
858 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 82 MongoDB Enterprise Advanced reviews

4,973 Views
2,984 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Apache HBase

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and Apache HBase compete in the database application category. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced might have the upper hand due to its robust support and usability features, while Apache HBase provides notable scalability and performance for big data operations.

Features: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers comprehensive security, automation, and integration with modern development environments, ensuring a seamless experience for businesses. Apache HBase is favored for handling large-scale data transactions, ensuring high availability and efficient failover support, making it suitable for organizations managing extensive data flows.

Room for Improvement: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced could enhance its handling of high-density writes and scaling under extreme conditions. Additionally, simplifying complex query optimization could benefit many users. Apache HBase might improve by streamlining deployment complexity, enhancing user documentation, and introducing more intuitive interface options for non-expert users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced simplifies deployment with extensive customer service support, ideal for enterprises seeking smooth implementation. Apache HBase, although complex to deploy, provides powerful results and offers technical support options for detailed and intricate requirements, benefiting those who manage its deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced presents a higher setup cost but offers a robust ROI through its feature-rich platform, attracting organizations focusing on immediate and long-term benefits. Apache HBase, while more cost-effective upfront, provides a solid ROI with its high-performance capabilities and scalability, appealing to companies prioritizing efficient large data processing.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache HBase

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (4th), Managed NoSQL Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Apache HBase is 5.1%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 15.9%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced	15.9%
Apache HBase	5.1%
Other	79.0%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Ephrem Sisay

DevOps Engineer (M-PESA) at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

In-memory processing and integration capabilities have optimized query performance

Apache HBase could be improved by optimizing the integration with Apache Phoenix; sometimes the abstraction and lookup jobs lead to issues when there are too many requests. Resource optimization isn't always as successful as it should be, which can cause some query and lookup jobs to fail. For instance, during eligibility checks for credit, if there are many requests on the database, it might fail, and after such a failure, it doesn't allow us to run queries from the moment they stop. If there could be optimization to require less resource usage and allow those jobs and queries to pick up from where they stopped, that would be a great addition to the tool.

Read full review

Fabien GOUINEAU

Architecte Cloud at Visiativ SA

Offers reliable engine for legacy needs but requires enhanced cost management and AI features

While MongoDB is a good product, it is also an expensive product for support, and its scalability is acceptable, but the big problem with MongoDB is the cost. For security in MongoDB, we work with encrypted databases by default, but we have not contracted the security options in our contract because it is too expensive, so we only implement encrypted databases without the security pack, which is very expensive for us; in security, we are at the first steps, just using encrypted databases. I think additional features needed in MongoDB include perhaps vector databases, as I think they are not supported right now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."

"The in-memory processing lets us optimize our queries and helps us run concurrent queries and other jobs such as the lookup jobs we always use Apache HBase for."

"The best features of Apache HBase include being embedded, making it very fast; when it's linking, it operates with virtually no delay, and all of the queries are very fast too due to some internal optimization which makes it very sufficient and efficient."

"The most valuable part is the column family structure."

"The in-memory processing lets us optimize our queries and helps us run concurrent queries and other jobs such as the lookup jobs we always use Apache HBase for."

"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."

"The community is great if you have problem."

"The initial setup isn't really that complex."

"I find the integration with other tools very easy."

"MongoDB is cool. There is a difference between relational databases and newer databases like MongoDB. MongoDB is scalable and fast."

"We haven't had any issues with stability."

"The clustering is very good. It allows us to have high availability."

"I found that MongoDB is most valuable for storing school-related queries. It's also user-friendly, and I found no difficulty accessing it. Setting it up is easy too."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

Cons

"Apache HBase could be improved by optimizing the integration with Apache Phoenix; sometimes the abstraction and lookup jobs lead to issues when there are too many requests."

"The setup of Apache HBase needs a lot of time, and the linkage is not the program itself, but the activation and connecting to the NYPD engine always takes considerable time."

"Apache HBase could be improved by optimizing the integration with Apache Phoenix; sometimes the abstraction and lookup jobs lead to issues when there are too many requests."

"We've seen performance issues."

"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."

"The solution could include more integrations with other platforms."

"There was a need for integrating relational database capabilities, however, MongoDB has introduced a relational converter that allows conversion between SQL and NoSQL."

"It is important to note that MongoDB has limitations since it can only be used for specific use cases. For example, for master data, I would want to pick keys using an RDBMS, but for attachments, I would choose MongoDB."

"I feel that most people don't know a lot about MongoDB, so maybe they could add some more documentation and tutorials."

"Simplifying the aggregation framework would be an improvement."

"There should be better integration with other databases."

"It would be much more useful if I have an admin user and a password."

"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions. Instead of MongoDB, we will use Oracle Database because for a transactional service, you have to rely on RDBMS ACID properties. I would love to work on MongoDB by using my mobile phone. When I am working remotely or traveling and have some instances deployed on my server, I should be able to check through my mobile whether all the data is being pulled. GitHub has a similar feature, where it lets you read from the laptop, and you can also pull and push with your mobile phone. I would request MongoDB to provide such a feature. Basically, I want a mobile version for both iOS and Android versions."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."

"At the moment, all customers are using the community version."

"The solution is open source, so it is free."

"If you want support with the solution you will need to purchase a license and not use the open-source version. The license is a little expensive."

"I only used the open-source version."

"MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others."

"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."

"I currently use the solution's community edition which is free."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apache HBase?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apache HBase?

I'm working for a corporate that uses Apache HBase for their Big Data platform and I'm a Big Data engineer there. We're using a version of Apache HBase that is compatible with the other Big Data to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache HBase?

The cost depends on the EC2 instances and the size of the data you're indexing.

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

For a small company, the cost of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is reasonable, but for heavy data usage, we see a little bit of cost pressure but it's acceptable. I will not be able to elaborate on th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

The integration between data warehouse could be improved. Nowadays, a lot of data is getting generated, so certain ETL flexible scripts with backend database integrations would be an improvement I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Accumulo vs Apache HBase

Compared 16% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Apache HBase

Compared 15% of the time

Cassandra vs Apache HBase

Compared 8% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Apache HBase

Compared 6% of the time

Redis vs Apache HBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache HBase Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 7% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Berkeley DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 3% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

November 2025

Download Apache HBase product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

December 2025

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Also Known As

HBase

No data available

Overview

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational database modeled after Google's BigTable. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, Apache HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Hadoop and HDFS.

Apache

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Bloomberg, Wells Fargo, Apple, Capital One, NVIDIA

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Buyer's Guide

Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

December 2025

Free Report: Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache HBase vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.