We performed a comparison between Anaplan and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."The solution works very well for budgeting."
"This product has a very good modeling feature, and its graphical representation of visualizations has also been valuable."
"Anaplan's strongest feature is that its GUI is very modern and user-friendly."
"You don't need to have a programming language to use Anaplan."
"Anaplan's most valuable features are that it's a no-coding platform, everything can be scaled to your other functions, and it's easy to learn and use (especially because Anaplan provides excellent interactive training)."
"The solution scales well."
"Anaplan is a three-dimensional cloud platform that is good for analyzing data, visualization, integration, terrific for visibility."
"It's highly flexible. If you've got a complex environment with complex calculations, you can build that out. So that's a really good positive."
"When correctly configured, this is a very stable solution. We have customers running their process automation manufacturing based off of this solution."
"As we have been using this for the past nine years we have had the opportunity to explore the product. Really everything has worked well and all the modules are very good."
"It makes financial operations easier to perform."
"The customer gets a better cost calculation and an integrated system between departments."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between accounts receivable, accounts payable, general ledger, and budgeting."
"It's highly customizable."
"It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure."
"Payroll and online benefits enrollment"
"Anaplan is a relatively expensive piece of software."
"The visualization tools in the product are limited in comparison to other reporting tools."
"Anaplan should come up with flexible options to connect to a data warehouse rather than an Anaplan hub."
"One area of improvement is conditional formatting. It's not very practical, and you need to specify additional formatting."
"The integration technique should be a little bit easier."
"Automation needs to be built into this solution."
"The cloud engine slows down when working with a large dataset. It still lacks a powerful engine."
"It would be nice if the solution offered better extensions."
"The EBS Design to some extent is still monolithic."
"From the business processes, there are areas where you could streamline new processes."
"The simplicity of the user experience needs to be improved tremendously."
"Technical support is focused on-cloud versus on-premise customers."
"The solution needs to be updated with modern technology as it currently runs on the Java platform, JWE, which is obsolete and requires you to need an API supported browser."
"It is still a little outdated as far as what we consider a twenty-first century software. You're still using Oracle forms, that sort of thing."
"The users feel that the product is not user-friendly."
"They should include database functionality."
Anaplan is ranked 1st in Business Performance Management with 24 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 5th in ERP with 141 reviews. Anaplan is rated 8.0, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Anaplan writes "Great for large-scale modelling, easy to learn, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". Anaplan is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle Hyperion, SAP S/4HANA, IBM Planning Analytics and SAP Analytics Cloud, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and Salesforce Sales Cloud.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.