Amazon QuickSight vs QBO comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Unscrambl, Inc are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.6, while Unscrambl, Inc is ranked #62. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.3% mindshare in BIT, compared to Unscrambl, Inc’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 63% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Unscrambl, Inc users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 29 Amazon QuickSight reviews

6,208 Views
5,810 Comparison Views

63% willing to recommend

QBO

Read 6 QBO reviews

130 Views
18 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

QBO

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Amazon QuickSight and QuickBooks Online compete in the business software category. Amazon QuickSight has a slight advantage for AWS users due to its affordability and integration with the AWS ecosystem.

Features: Amazon QuickSight integrates seamlessly with AWS, supports machine learning insights, and enables easy dashboard creation and customization. QuickBooks Online is known for user-friendly access, extensive accounting capabilities, and versatile integration with platforms like SAP and Oracle.

Room for Improvement: Amazon QuickSight could improve data visualization options, dynamic data refreshes, and simplify its deployment processes. QuickBooks Online could enhance keyboard usability, improve inventory functionalities, and offer a more intuitive client portal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon QuickSight provides private and public cloud deployment but may require technical support for smooth implementation. QuickBooks Online offers a cloud-based solution with mixed customer service reviews regarding response times and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon QuickSight is cost-effective for AWS users with usage-based pricing, providing a good ROI when integrated effectively. QuickBooks Online, despite a higher price point, is valued for its comprehensive functionality, offering long-term benefits and solid ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QBO

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

62nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 6.3%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QBO is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Mohd Farhan

AWS Cloud Solution Developer | DevOps | SpringBoot | Android/iOS at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Has seamless data filtering and visualization for client satisfaction

One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need for enhancement in data visualization speed. Additionally, the role-level security is challenging to implement, and it could be improved to allow access control per department more easily.

Read full review

Mimi Evans

Owner/Operator at Fearless Bookkeeping Services LLC

Offer great partnership models and relatively simple to use

My only issue with QuickBooks Online is their inventory capabilities. My understanding is that they're rolling out improvements in 2023, but anytime a person asks me about using QuickBooks Online and inventory, then I always recommend the desktop version because otherwise the functionality isn't great. They're trying to become the all-in source that we use for everything. However, the product lakcs a client portal, a feature that would make a huge difference. I'm an accountant and if I can't use it well, I can't train my customers to use it well. There are so many professional service companies that would love to be able to offer a client portal of some sort but they're so industry-specific or they're outrageously expensive because they're meant for enterprise level. I don't like the UI or the functionality of their cash flow planner. I would rather pay for another software than use theirs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is its connectivity with other Amazon services."

"It has a lot of valuable features, but the most important aspect is the affordable cost. This solution costs much less in comparison to the competitors like Qlik Sense, Power BI, and Tableau."

"Compared to other reporting tools, it is very effective but does require an understanding of certain concepts in QuickSight. This understanding is crucial for creating dimensions, changing metrics, and visualizing reports."

"A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well."

"The ease with which it integrates with different data sources is most valuable. Especially when everything is on AWS, it is easy to connect to the data source and organize different dashboards."

"QuickSight makes it easy to provision, create, and publish dashboards."

"It works well with the AWS ecosystem."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"The most valuable features of QBO are its order processing and sales capabilities, as well as its invoice and batch processing capabilities. It allows for multiple batch processing and integration with other platforms, such as SAP V1, Oracle, and Dynamics BC. This makes the solution versatile and effective for customers, and they are satisfied with its integration with different platforms. The integration of this solution is not fixed, it can be based on the user's requirements."

"The most valuable feature is the collaboration around allowing many people to ask questions and see the dashboards together."

"It's intuitive, electronic, and, as in the old days, eliminates the need for pen and paper. It is the only option. It's the best software."

"The scheduling feature for salaries and taxes is one of the best features of QBO. It's also very user-friendly."

"QBO has a very good reconciliation tool."

"The most valuable feature of QBO is that it can be reconnected at any time and anywhere. It is not like other software where you have to back up and restore the data."

Cons

"QuickSight needs to add more visuals similar to what Power BI offers."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the number of visualizations and dashboards that are available."

"I would like to see a feature that allows us to save a draft version before making it public and publishing it."

"Compared to Power BI, I felt QuickSight lacks some features, like delayed drill-downs. Drill-downs were the main area where we found QuickSight lacking."

"They could provide more options for graphics and other features."

"The solution must be more user-friendly."

"The cost of queries is very high."

"There should be better connectors for different data sets."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"Compared to offline accounting software with many shortcuts and allows you to operate the software using the keyboard, QBO doesn't have the keyboard feature."

"The internet version is less user-friendly than the desktop version. The desktop version is their flagship, whereas the online version is considerably different, requiring all new learning and having several glitches."

"The Linux Operating System feature is not available. When we access it from the accounting features, it does not transit to installation."

"The dashboards can be improved by making them customizable in a more granular manner."

"QBO could be improved by adding more flexibility in its invoice and sales order processing capabilities. Customers have requested the ability to integrate with different retail services and the ability to easily integrate with different payment gateways, such as PayPal, by providing API and credentials, with the system automatically processing the integration."

"Inventory capabilities are lacking in the cloud version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan."

"It's affordable compared to other long-term contractor business tools available in the market."

"The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department."

"I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"In my opinion, QBO is a bit on the pricey side, but you have no choice. It is still better, in the long run, to go with their pricing or their software than the alternatives."

"The solution is expensive."

"I give the pricing a nine out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 26% of the time

Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 17% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 16% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 6% of the time

Databricks vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

June 2025

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

QBO

June 2025

Download QBO product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

QBO combines the power of natural language and spontaneous collaboration to deliver on-demand insights to the decision-makers. Winning features of QBO: 1. Easily connect to multiple internal and external datasets 2. Slice-and-diced data in infinite ways using natural language (English) and interactive visualizations 3. Responds easily to descriptive, diagnostic, predictive and prescriptive questions 4. Native integration with Microsoft Teams 5. Save and share your findings easily on interactive boards URL of the product : https://www.unscrambl.com/qbo-insights/ Powered by Unscrambl, we believe that our increasingly complex world of data can be simplified and transformed into actionable insights, saving valuable time and resources for every business. Unscrambl develops next-generation conversational analytics software that gives business users the power to access and consume data instantly and collaboratively. Unscrambl is headquartered in the United States and has offices in Singapore, Turkey, India, and the Philippines. For more information, please visit www.unscrambl.com

Unscrambl, Inc

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

SATS, Celcom, EastWest, DBS, Metrobank, XL-Axiata, Etisalat, UnionBank of the Philippines

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon QuickSight vs. QBO report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.