AWS Cloud Solution Developer | DevOps | SpringBoot | Android/iOS at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
Dec 20, 2024
Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.
AWS Quicksight consultant at Thermo Fisher Scientific
Real User
Top 10
Nov 25, 2024
Pricing could be improved. QuickSight lacks a desktop version, which makes it more suitable for organizations rather than individuals. I'd rate it five out of ten.
Analytics Practice at INFRABEAT TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD
Real User
Jan 4, 2024
The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market. Amazon QuickSight has a monthly subscription. There are no extra costs for report consumption, but an additional cost is incurred only when the users have additional storage.
Sr. Business Intelligence Analyst at ClearSource Bpo
Real User
Oct 20, 2023
For end-users, the price seems to be based on a per-view model, meaning you pay for the number of views of the dashboard. As for developers, it might involve an annual cost of around $36, although I am not exactly sure. In addition to licensing costs, there can be extra expenses for using Amazon QuickSight. To maximize its functionality, you might need to integrate it with other AWS services like S3 and SMS. QuickSight alone may not be fully usable, so additional subscriptions to these services could be necessary to make it more effective.
Software Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Jul 18, 2023
The solution is not affordable. Recently, we had to create a dashboard programmatically, so I had to create some policies. AWS charged me more for it. The solution can be afforded by big companies, not by smaller ones.
Senior Database Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Jun 1, 2023
There are different cost structures for using Amazon QuickSight. A fixed membership can be obtained and a timeframe basis membership is available for users too. I believe the pricing is quite low and the solution is worth the money.
There are no additional license fees apart from the standard licensing fees. However, the standard license is meant only for internal users and not for free readers. That's a problem, because to have free viewers, you need to escalate up to the enterprise license which ideally should not be the case.
Senior Product Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Mar 9, 2023
The pricing is very reasonable. They are very cheap. Right now, we are paying $200 a month to use it. I'm not aware of any other additional costs beyond that one fee.
Research Student at Technische Hochschule Deggendorf
Real User
Dec 1, 2022
I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare. Still, if Amazon QuickSight has lower pricing than Power BI, then it's the better product, but if its pricing is higher, then the pricing for Amazon QuickSight needs to be lowered.
It's not a one-time purchase. It's like they build you on three fronts. One is the SpiceDB capacity that you buy. Another is the author account you create in QuickSight and the reader's account. For an author account and SpiceDB capacity, there is a fixed charge. For the author, it's $24 per month. For SpiceDB capacity, it's somewhere at around $0.30 per GB per month. For the reader account, there is no charge. It's pay per session, and I don't know the price per session. You need to be aware of how you have it set up. Even though we have, let's say, 50 authors, for example, out of those 50 authors, only two or three authors were creating dashboards. The rest of the authors were sitting idle. At that point, we got billed unnecessarily. Later on, we figured it out, and we removed the unnecessary authors.
Sr. BigData Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
MSP
Oct 6, 2022
The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department.
Technical Lead at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 5, 2022
The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable.
The cost of the solution has a minimal cost if users are already on the AWS stack. There are additional service fees based on the services it consumes. However, the cost is pretty mild. It's not like it's a few pennies a day. However, it's a per service or CPU and disc storage, and it's mostly CPU. It's a minimal surcharge as you're consuming more services on AWS.
Director of User Experience at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Feb 4, 2021
If it is on an iframe on a separate server and we're trying to employ something that is serverless technology, we have to pay each time they went and tapped the service. So, every call to the server had a cost associated, which can make it quite expensive depending on how much you use. I've dealt with smaller hosts with unlimited bandwidth and unlimited space for 20 hours a month. The prices of AWS, Azure are astronomical. It is kind of frustrating, but it is what it is. It is the industry standard.
Amazon QuickSight offers rapid visualization creation, cloud-native AWS integration, ease of use, scalability, and affordability. With strong data connectors and machine learning tools, it supports real-time insights and intuitive data handling.Amazon QuickSight is designed for fast visualizations, interactive dashboards, and extensive data connectivity, making it suitable for finance and academia. Offering browser-based access and advanced security, it enables organizations to integrate data...
Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.
QuickSight is considered cost-effective. As far as I know, QuickSight is cheaper compared to other solutions like Power BI.
Pricing could be improved. QuickSight lacks a desktop version, which makes it more suitable for organizations rather than individuals. I'd rate it five out of ten.
Competition pricing is high for query processing, however, the Data Lake cost is nominal as it is on top of S3.
My company had a corporate discount and other arrangements, so I'm not familiar with the standard pricing.
The product pricing is better than other vendors.
The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market. Amazon QuickSight has a monthly subscription. There are no extra costs for report consumption, but an additional cost is incurred only when the users have additional storage.
I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price.
For end-users, the price seems to be based on a per-view model, meaning you pay for the number of views of the dashboard. As for developers, it might involve an annual cost of around $36, although I am not exactly sure. In addition to licensing costs, there can be extra expenses for using Amazon QuickSight. To maximize its functionality, you might need to integrate it with other AWS services like S3 and SMS. QuickSight alone may not be fully usable, so additional subscriptions to these services could be necessary to make it more effective.
The solution’s price is fine. I rate the pricing a six out of ten. The pricing depends on the number of authors and readers we need.
The solution is not affordable. Recently, we had to create a dashboard programmatically, so I had to create some policies. AWS charged me more for it. The solution can be afforded by big companies, not by smaller ones.
There are different cost structures for using Amazon QuickSight. A fixed membership can be obtained and a timeframe basis membership is available for users too. I believe the pricing is quite low and the solution is worth the money.
There are no additional license fees apart from the standard licensing fees. However, the standard license is meant only for internal users and not for free readers. That's a problem, because to have free viewers, you need to escalate up to the enterprise license which ideally should not be the case.
The pricing is very reasonable. They are very cheap. Right now, we are paying $200 a month to use it. I'm not aware of any other additional costs beyond that one fee.
The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan.
I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare. Still, if Amazon QuickSight has lower pricing than Power BI, then it's the better product, but if its pricing is higher, then the pricing for Amazon QuickSight needs to be lowered.
It's not a one-time purchase. It's like they build you on three fronts. One is the SpiceDB capacity that you buy. Another is the author account you create in QuickSight and the reader's account. For an author account and SpiceDB capacity, there is a fixed charge. For the author, it's $24 per month. For SpiceDB capacity, it's somewhere at around $0.30 per GB per month. For the reader account, there is no charge. It's pay per session, and I don't know the price per session. You need to be aware of how you have it set up. Even though we have, let's say, 50 authors, for example, out of those 50 authors, only two or three authors were creating dashboards. The rest of the authors were sitting idle. At that point, we got billed unnecessarily. Later on, we figured it out, and we removed the unnecessary authors.
The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department.
The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable.
Amazon QuickSight you subscribe and you use the service.
The cost of the solution has a minimal cost if users are already on the AWS stack. There are additional service fees based on the services it consumes. However, the cost is pretty mild. It's not like it's a few pennies a day. However, it's a per service or CPU and disc storage, and it's mostly CPU. It's a minimal surcharge as you're consuming more services on AWS.
It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions.
If it is on an iframe on a separate server and we're trying to employ something that is serverless technology, we have to pay each time they went and tapped the service. So, every call to the server had a cost associated, which can make it quite expensive depending on how much you use. I've dealt with smaller hosts with unlimited bandwidth and unlimited space for 20 hours a month. The prices of AWS, Azure are astronomical. It is kind of frustrating, but it is what it is. It is the industry standard.
I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices.