Amazon QuickSight vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #142. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in BIT, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 68% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 34 Amazon QuickSight reviews

6,411 Views
4,488 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

640 Views
90 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QuickSight and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,954 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

142nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (86th), GRC (62nd), Quality Management Software (47th), Document Management Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 3.7%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon QuickSight	3.7%
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.1%
Other	96.2%

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ndip Takou

IT Infrastructure Support Specialist at Olam Agri

Can always access reports through intuitive dashboards that support diverse data connections

I can't specifically say how Amazon QuickSight could be improved since I focus more on using it and leveraging its functionalities. However, I could invest additional time to explore possible feedback from customers regarding their challenges. As cloud engineers, our capacity to improve is limited since AWS manages the services, but I would be open to feedback. I'm aware there are minor details that AWS could enhance, such as optimizing costs for beginners or small startups, which can be steep when trying to take Amazon QuickSight into production. Many have noticed that AWS services greatly benefit well-established companies, while startups struggle with costs as they transition data out of AWS. Understanding how AWS charges for Amazon QuickSight usage is critical for all users wanting to visualize their data effectively.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease with which it integrates with different data sources is most valuable. Especially when everything is on AWS, it is easy to connect to the data source and organize different dashboards."

"I like that with Amazon QuickSight, you don't need to install an app to use its services. With other BI tools, you need to install the app, so Amazon QuickSight is better for me in this area."

"Efficiency has definitely improved, and the speed of developing analytics and insights has increased by at least twenty percent."

"The best part about Amazon QuickSight is the filtration capability."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface."

"QuickSight is a great savior in terms of row level security, providing almost equivalent value to Tableau and Power BI."

"Amazon QuickSight can provide insights from the available data. It supports various rule types. We get the options of machine learning and insights, which are not available in other intelligence tools. It is easier to use, more stable, and cheaper than other solutions."

"The solution is simple to implement."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

Cons

"There should be better connectors for different data sets."

"AWS services greatly benefit well-established companies, while startups struggle with costs as they transition data out of AWS."

"One area where Amazon QuickSight could improve is its formatting features for dashboards."

"An area for improvement in Amazon QuickSight is storage. Data cleanup also needs improvement because I'm experiencing errors when cleaning the data. Amazon QuickSight needs video tutorials showing its different functions and purposes."

"There could be an end-to-end pipeline for data cleaning as well as presenting it using different visualizations."

"The setup process falls somewhere in the middle. It is not straightforward, nor is it complex, but there is a significant amount of work needed on the back end to make it function."

"Amazon QuickSight has minimal features. The feature set can be improved to allow you to create good production-ready dashboards. This does not happen with QuickSite, it needs to mature to be used in production."

"I would like to see a feature that allows us to save a draft version before making it public and publishing it."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"The solution is not affordable."

"The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department."

"It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."

"The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market."

"I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"Amazon QuickSight you subscribe and you use the service."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

I don't want to hypothetically say about the effectiveness of Amazon QuickSight in terms of machine learning, so I need to pass on that. At the moment, on the cloud perspective, we have Amazon majo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 48% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 10% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 4% of the time

QlikView vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 48% of the time

RSA Archer vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 27% of the time

Mitratech Alyne vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 25% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

January 2026

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

January 2026

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.