Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon QuickSight vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.6, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.6% mindshare in BIT, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 63% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.
Amazon QuickSight
Read 29 Amazon QuickSight reviews
  • 6,208 Views
  • 5,810 Comparison Views
63% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Amazon QuickSight and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight
Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Interfacing Technologies En...
Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
29th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), GRC (21st), Quality Management Software (18th), Document Management Software (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 6.6%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mohd Farhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Has seamless data filtering and visualization for client satisfaction
One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need for enhancement in data visualization speed. Additionally, the role-level security is challenging to implement, and it could be improved to allow access control per department more easily.
Read full review
SantoshKulkarni1 - PeerSpot reviewer
A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities
I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It works well with the AWS ecosystem."
"A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well."
"It is notably fast in handling large data set refreshes, making it efficient for data analysis."
"Amazon QuickSight has introduced a new functionality called Q bar, which allows the user to do natural language queries and get additional insights using some built-in generative capabilities."
"The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there."
"One of the most valuable features of Amazon QuickSight has been the speed at which visualizations can be created."
"It has a lot of valuable features, but the most important aspect is the affordable cost. This solution costs much less in comparison to the competitors like Qlik Sense, Power BI, and Tableau."
"It is fine for basic reporting."
More Amazon QuickSight pros
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
 

Cons

"It's not ideal for reports that are more complex."
"Amazon QuickSight's visualization could be improved."
"There should be better connectors for different data sets."
"It can be made more user-friendly as some users might find this solution hard to implement. Qlik Sense, for example, is very user-friendly."
"Right now, you can't use Amazon QuickSight on other cloud providers, so I'd like it to have availability on other cloud providers. This is an area for improvement in the product. What I'd like to see in Amazon QuickSight in the future is a distributed centralized system where I can manage all reports in one place, and for Amazon QuickSight to become reporting as a service."
"Lacked connectivity with other third-party tools and data sources."
"The number of features in the product is limited in comparison with the other tools in the market, like Power BI."
"One area is that integrating data from different sources into QuickSight can be a bit tricky, especially with Amazon Connect. To get data flowing, you need to use two additional services and configure them correctly."
More Amazon QuickSight cons
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."
"The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."
"Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments."
"It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."
"I rate the price of Amazon QuickSight a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan."
"The product pricing is better than other vendors."
"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."
More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice
"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?
The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?
Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?
One area for improvement is the cost, as it's a bit expensive. The caching mechanism also charges too much if I need to cache any data. Sometimes it takes time to display data, suggesting a need fo...
See all answers
What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?
We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight Logo
Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight
Compared 26% of the time
Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight Logo
Tableau vs Amazon QuickSight
Compared 18% of the time
Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight Logo
Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight
Compared 15% of the time
Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight Logo
Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight
Compared 7% of the time
Databricks vs Amazon QuickSight Logo
Databricks vs Amazon QuickSight
Compared 6% of the time
More Amazon QuickSight Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Amazon QuickSight
June 2025
Amazon QuickSight reportDownload Amazon QuickSight product report
Buyer's Guide
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
June 2025
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reportDownload Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report
 

Also Known As

QuickSight
Enterprise Process Center
 

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?
  • Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
  • Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
  • Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
  • Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.
What should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
  • Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
  • Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation
 

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com
Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange
Buyer's Guide
Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center
June 2025
Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Amazon QuickSight vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.
See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.